Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
“It is our opinion that it is the members duty voluntarily to contribute to their minister’s support, and if the deacon discovers any remiss in their duty, that he shall cite him to the church; and if the church find him negligent in his duty, we give it as our advice, that the church should deal f1021 with him for covetousness.” f1024 At its meeting in 1788 this association (1.) “Do recommend to the consideration of the different churches for their approbation or disapprobation,” the “raising a fund in the first place by their own contribution. (2.) By public contributions from the inhabitants, twice in the year at least. Which money so collected and deposited in the hands of some person, and subject to the orders of the church, to be appropriated to the aid of any traveling preacher, whom they shall judge to be sent of God to preach.” f1025 In the circular letter to this association, in 1791, we read: “We proceed, in our circular letter, at this time, to make a few observations on the necessary support of gospel ministers; although we are sorry that there should be the least occasion to write or speak on that, subject. … Ministers have a divine right to maintenance from the people.” f1026 T.H. Pritchard, D.D., one of our most scholarly and critical writers, says: “I shall now prove from unquestionable historical facts that the associations which are now anti-missionary were in favor of foreign missions up to the year 1826, ‘27 and ‘30, and hence have no claim to the title of the Old School Baptists. “I will begin with the Baltimore association, perhaps the most famous body of this modern sect in the United States. Their minutes for 1814 contain the following record: ‘Received a corresponding letter from Bro. Rice, one of our missionary brethren, on the subject of encouraging missionary societies.’ This Bro. Rice was Luther Rice, who was then just from Burmah, where he had gone as a missionary with Adoniram Judson. “In 1816 these minutes in their circular letter say: ‘The many revivals of religion which are witnessed in various parts of the country — the multiplication of Bible societies, missionary societies and Sunday schools, both in our own and foreign countries, are viewed by us as showing indications of the near approach of that day when the knowledge of the Lord shall cover the earth.’ The minutes of the same year state that ‘the standing clerk was instructed to supply the corresponding secretary of the Foreign Mission Board with a copy of our minutes annually.’ In 1817 ‘Bro. Luther Rice presented him-self as the messenger of the Baptist Board of Foreign Missions and was cordially received.’
“Elder James Osborne was a member of this body, which cordially received a foreign missionary and at this very session was appointed a home missionary. This man Osborne, who was a leader in the anti-mission secession, both in Maryland and North Carolina, I remember to have seen in Charlotte when I was a small boy. He was a handsome, dressy man, full of conceit, and very fond of talking of himself and of selling his own books. “From the same authentic source, the minutes of the Baltimore association, we learn that in 1828 they called themselves ‘Regular Baptists,’ just as we do now; the same year they express their joy at the intelligence of the conversion of the heathen, and as late as 1827 the association expressed, by formal resolutions, their sorrow at the death of Mrs. Ann H. Judson and their great interest in the mission with which she was connected, and it was not till 1836, when the association met with the Black Rock church, and then by a vote of sixteen to nine, that fellowship was withdrawn from churches favoring foreign missions, Sunday schools, etc.” To come back now to North Carolina, I can prove that the Kehukee and Country Line Associations, two of the most influential of the anti-mission party, were once missionary bodies. In Burkitt and Read’s History of the Kehukee Association it is stated on page 139, that in 1794, a special day was appointed to pray God for a revival of religion, and on page 145 that it was the custom of ministers of that date to invite penitents to come forward and kneel down to be prayed for, just as we do in our revival meetings now. In Bigg’s History of the Kehukee Association, page 162, it appears that this association appointed delegates to meet at Cashie Church, Bertie County, in June, 1805, with delegates from the Virginia, Portsmouth and Neuse associations, and at this meeting arrangements were made to collect money for missionary purposes. That it appears that the Kehukee was not only in fellowship with the Portsmouth and other missionary Baptist associations, but that the very first missionary society ever organized in the State, was in the bounds of this body. In 1812 this association sent $3, in 1813 $5, and in 1814 $5, to the general meeting of correspondence of North Carolina, which was an organization of the Missionary Baptists. The same history of the association shows that in 1817 it was in correspondence with the General Convention of the Baptists which met that year in Philadelphia and which was supporting Judson and other foreign missionaries, and it was not till 1827 that this association took a decided antimissionary ground. The evidence to show that the Country Line Association was a missionary body up to the year 1832 is perfectly overwhelming. Its minutes show that in
- Page 235 and 236: of Baptist principles are the demon
- Page 237 and 238: (7.) Laying all this aside, I have
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 24. — JOHN SMYTH’S BAPT
- Page 241 and 242: thereof. Now it is reason-able to c
- Page 243 and 244: Smith Watson, and now we cannot, at
- Page 245 and 246: Orchard’s suggestion, that Spilsb
- Page 247 and 248: CHAPTER 25. — THROUGH WELSH BAPTI
- Page 249 and 250: In the year 603, Augustine, called
- Page 251 and 252: “The vale of Olchon is difficult
- Page 253 and 254: earth can tell where the church was
- Page 255 and 256: Says Cramp: “A church was immedia
- Page 257 and 258: any others than Wickenden, Brown, e
- Page 259 and 260: Armitage says: “In view of the fa
- Page 261 and 262: No church or minister ever originat
- Page 263 and 264: Brown, Wickenden and Dexter. … Th
- Page 265 and 266: “The first certain date in their
- Page 267 and 268: Massachusetts Baptist churches thus
- Page 269 and 270: “In the year 1751, Mr. Nicholas B
- Page 271 and 272: Christian era. … He had little ec
- Page 273 and 274: organized before Williams’ church
- Page 275 and 276: fellowship any who should do these
- Page 277 and 278: (3.) To assist those members that s
- Page 279 and 280: pleased the Lord to stir up their h
- Page 281 and 282: “agreed that the churches should
- Page 283 and 284: Silas Hart, 1795, died and left to
- Page 285: letters desiring the aid of this bo
- Page 289 and 290: As there is no difference in doctri
- Page 291 and 292: So, without looking into their othe
- Page 293 and 294: laid on infant baptism. … We are
- Page 295 and 296: church. … I cannot be conscientio
- Page 297 and 298: spiritual choice for any souls. Hen
- Page 299 and 300: “We are surprised to learn that t
- Page 301 and 302: In defining baptizo the American ed
- Page 303 and 304: “That this is a mistranslation th
- Page 305 and 306: M. T. Yates and A.B. Cabaniss are a
- Page 307 and 308: the rate of 99 per cent.; Campbelli
- Page 309 and 310: THE FOLLOWING FROM THE BAPTIST YEAR
- Page 311 and 312: property, their good name, their li
- Page 313 and 314: doctrinal or practical word, they h
- Page 315 and 316: CHAPTER 29. — ST. PATRICK A BAPTI
- Page 317 and 318: crowned in A.D. 1057. When Collier
- Page 319 and 320: Thus, first, Irish monasteries were
- Page 321 and 322: REVELATION 20:2. ROMISH CHURCH TREE
- Page 323 and 324: FOOTNOTES ft1 In this list I have n
- Page 325 and 326: seed.” The “invisible” notion
- Page 327 and 328: ft95 From wieder, meaning again, an
- Page 329 and 330: y aspersion, in the bed in whirl’
- Page 331 and 332: ft182 Israel of the Alps, vol. 1, p
- Page 333 and 334: ft245 Robinson’s Eccl. Researches
- Page 335 and 336: ft300 Kurtz’s Chr. Hist., vol. 1,
“Elder James Osborne was a member of this body, which cordially received a<br />
foreign missionary and at this very session was appointed a home missionary.<br />
This man Osborne, who was a leader in the anti-mission secession, both in<br />
Maryland and North Carolina, I remember to have seen in Charlotte when I<br />
was a small boy. He was a handsome, dressy man, full of conceit, and very<br />
fond of talking of himself and of selling his own books.<br />
“From the same authentic source, the minutes of the Baltimore association,<br />
we learn that in 1828 they called themselves ‘Regular <strong>Baptist</strong>s,’ just as we do<br />
now; the same year they express their joy at the intelligence of the conversion<br />
of the heathen, and as late as 1827 the association expressed, by formal<br />
resolutions, their sorrow at the death of Mrs. Ann H. Judson and their great<br />
interest in the mission with which she was connected, and it was not till 1836,<br />
when the association met with the Black Rock church, and then by a vote of<br />
sixteen to nine, that fellowship was withdrawn from churches favoring foreign<br />
missions, Sunday schools, etc.”<br />
To come back now to North Carolina, I can prove that the Kehukee and<br />
Country Line Associations, two of the most influential of the anti-mission<br />
party, were once missionary bodies. In Burkitt and Read’s History of the<br />
Kehukee Association it is stated on page 139, that in 1794, a special day was<br />
appointed to pray God for a revival of religion, and on page 145 that it was the<br />
custom of ministers of that date to invite penitents to come forward and kneel<br />
down to be prayed for, just as we do in our revival meetings now.<br />
In Bigg’s History of the Kehukee Association, page 162, it appears that this<br />
association appointed delegates to meet at Cashie <strong>Church</strong>, Bertie County, in<br />
June, 1805, with delegates from the Virginia, Portsmouth and Neuse<br />
associations, and at this meeting arrangements were made to collect money for<br />
missionary purposes. That it appears that the Kehukee was not only in<br />
fellowship with the Portsmouth and other missionary <strong>Baptist</strong> associations, but<br />
that the very first missionary society ever organized in the State, was in the<br />
bounds of this body.<br />
In 1812 this association sent $3, in 1813 $5, and in 1814 $5, to the general<br />
meeting of correspondence of North Carolina, which was an organization of<br />
the Missionary <strong>Baptist</strong>s.<br />
The same history of the association shows that in 1817 it was in<br />
correspondence with the General Convention of the <strong>Baptist</strong>s which met that<br />
year in Philadelphia and which was supporting Judson and other foreign<br />
missionaries, and it was not till 1827 that this association took a decided antimissionary<br />
ground.<br />
The evidence to show that the Country Line Association was a missionary<br />
body up to the year 1832 is perfectly overwhelming. Its minutes show that in