09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Speaking of this church he adds below: ‘This last continued till about twenty<br />

years ago, when becoming destitute of an elder, the members were united with<br />

other churches. … This was written in 1738. The church had then been extinct<br />

about twenty years; that is it lost its visibility about 1718. … And thus passed<br />

away the original church, and the waves of time have almost obliterated its<br />

remembrance from the minds of men.’” f897<br />

Adlam says:<br />

“When Olney’s church was formed I cannot tell; but as Comer, dating the<br />

Newport church no farther back than 1644, says it was the first of the <strong>Baptist</strong><br />

denomination in America, Olney’s church could not have been formed until<br />

after that period. I think it could not have been formed until about the year<br />

1650. My reasons are, I find no trace of a <strong>Baptist</strong> church in Providence, after<br />

the failure of Roger Williams, till after that year. The first intimation of a<br />

church there, I find in the fall of 1651, when Holmes, after being scourged in<br />

Boston, returning home says: ‘The brethren of our town (Rehobeth,) and<br />

Providence, having taken pains to meet me four miles in the woods, we<br />

rejoiced together. This occurred in September, 1651. That it was as late as I<br />

have fixed appears also from another circumstance. I have not been able to<br />

find a single individual, out of Providence, who united with that church until<br />

1652; but every <strong>Baptist</strong> up to that time, known to belong to a church, live<br />

where he may, belonged to the church at Newport. We know that in the year<br />

1651, the Newport church had members in Lynn, and in Rehobeth, in Mass.,<br />

and that persons came from Connecticut to unite with it. The case of the<br />

brethren in Rehobeth is peculiarly in point. In 1650 they left the<br />

Congregationalists and became <strong>Baptist</strong>s. If at that time a church had existed<br />

in Providence, a neighboring town, how naturally they should unite with it, so<br />

near and easy of access, and not go all the way down to Newport to unite with<br />

the church there. The only way to account for this is that there was no church<br />

in Providence, and no administrator there to whom they could apply. … If<br />

before 1644 a church did exist in Providence, how is it, that neither friend nor<br />

foe” (meaning of ancient times) “has noticed her, that every <strong>Baptist</strong> passed by<br />

her, even her nearest neighbors, and hurried down to Newport.” f894<br />

The following, from an able writer, gives the matter in a nutshell:<br />

(1.) “The church which Williams formed came to nothing or was dissolved<br />

soon after he left.<br />

(2.) It was reorganized, or another was formed under Thomas Olney as its<br />

pastor, who was one of the eleven baptized by Roger Williams. Olney<br />

continued to be pastor of this church until his death in 1682, somewhat over<br />

thirty years.<br />

(3.) In 1653, or 1654, which was a few years after the formation of Olney’s<br />

church, there was a division in that church on the question of laying on of<br />

hands … and a separate church was formed … under the pastorate of Chad

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!