Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

(3) The council of five hundred corresponded to our Senate or the House of Lords. Ephesus, then, had an ecclesia, and its meeting place the great theater of the city, and its duty to look after the general peace and welfare of the city — not to sit as a criminal court to try personal offenses. “Let us now examine Luke’s account of what took place, remembering that the ecclesia may have been in session before the uproar commenced, or that it, as it was its duty to do, came immediately together as soon as cognizant of it. Demetrius and his workmen and the mob, having seized Gaius and Aristarchus, rushed with them into the assembly, ‘and some [of the mob] cried one thing and some another, and the ecclesia was confused’ by these varied cries, while no definite charge was brought to its notice of which it could take cognizance. Now mark it was not the ecclesia that was riotous, but ‘oklos’ — crowd that had rushed into the theater where the ecclesia assembly of Ephesus was in orderly session, or had gathered to hold one; for it was the ‘oklos,’ not the ecclesia, that the presiding officer of the ecclesia quieted. (See Acts 19:35.) He informed this riotous, ‘oklos’ crowd, ‘if Demetrius and the workmen with him had a charge against any man, there were the courts and the proconsuls; but if it was about other things the ecclesia would settle it.’ The ecclesia was responsible for public tumults, insurrections, etc., and the officer appealed to the crowd to be quiet and disperse, ‘for,’ said he, speaking for the ecclesia, ‘we are even in danger of being accused about the tumult of to-day, there being no cause by which we [the ecclesia] can excuse this concourse’ — sustrophes — not ecclesia. And having said this, he adjourned, dissolved, the assembly — ecclesia — not the sustrophes — mob — which he could not dismiss. Now, in this account, we have, in Greek, four terms used: ‘demos,’ people; ‘oklos,’ crowd; ‘sustrophes,’ mob; ‘ecclesia,’ assembly — a body having civil jurisdiction. Ecclesia and sustrophes are never used interchangeably, never mean the same body.” Were we to admit that ecclesia here meant a “mob,” since the church in no way involves a mob, this passage has no bearing on what is the church. Liddell and Scott, in their Greek Lexicon, define the word, “ekklesia, an assembly of citizens summoned by the crier, the legislative assembly.” Dean Trench says: “Ekklesiaa, as all know, was the lawful assembly in a free Greek city of all those possessed of the rights of citizenship, for the transaction of public affairs. That they were summoned is expressed in the latter part of the word; that they were summoned out of the whole population, a select portion of it, including neither the populace, not yet strangers, nor those who had forfeited their civic rights — this is expressed in the first. Both the calling and the calling out, are moments to be remembered, when the word is assumed into a higher Christian sense, for in them the chief part of its peculiar adaptation to its auguster uses lie.”

If the kingdom and the church mean “the reign of grace in the heart without a visible organization,” as grace had reigned in the heart, at least, from the time of Abel, Daniel 2:44 and Matthew 16.18, could not have spoken of the kingdom and the church as not built before the New Testament age. A kingdom without organization — definite, ascertainable laws, is but the creature of the babel of sectarianism. It never did exist, in nature, in politics or in grace; and never can exist. It is twin brother to the notion that there is an “invisible church” — as if there were invisible men and women! The only part of the church which is invisible is the internal part and that part which has “crossed over the river.” That the term church in the New Testament, always means, literally, in the language of the New Hampshire Confession, “a congregation of baptized believers, associated by covenant in the faith and fellowship of the gospel, observing the ordinances of Christ,” and, in its few figurative uses, the aggregate of the local churches, and that the church and the kingdom are so related that neither can exist without the other, I have now clearly demonstrated. THIS BEING THE CASE, EVERY PROMISE OF PRESERVATION AND PERPETUITY, MADE TO THE KINGDOM, IS A PROMISE TO THE CHURCHES OF WHICH IT IS COMPOSED, AND vice versa. I will now proceed to prove the Bible promises that the church should never so far apostatize as to lose its existence as a true church. I. “I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them to do them good, but I will put my fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from me.” — Jeremiah 32: 40. (1.) That this refers to the New Testament none will deny. (2.) That the church and the “covenant” are indissoluble, will not be denied. (3.) That this covenant and its subjects are in contrast with the old covenant and its subjects, is equally evident. From this it follows, that, inasmuch, as the people of the old covenant apostatized, and that they were repudiated of God, the new covenant and its people are everlastingly united to Him. This is positively affirmed: (a) an “everlasting covenant;” (b) “fear in their HEARTS;” (c) “that they SHALL NOT DEPART from me” — no departing from God, as under the old covenant, no apostate Israel, hence Church Perpetuity.

(3) The council of five hundred corresponded to our Senate or the House of<br />

Lords. Ephesus, then, had an ecclesia, and its meeting place the great theater<br />

of the city, and its duty to look after the general peace and welfare of the city<br />

— not to sit as a criminal court to try personal offenses.<br />

“Let us now examine Luke’s account of what took place, remembering that<br />

the ecclesia may have been in session before the uproar commenced, or that it,<br />

as it was its duty to do, came immediately together as soon as cognizant of it.<br />

Demetrius and his workmen and the mob, having seized Gaius and<br />

Aristarchus, rushed with them into the assembly, ‘and some [of the mob] cried<br />

one thing and some another, and the ecclesia was confused’ by these varied<br />

cries, while no definite charge was brought to its notice of which it could take<br />

cognizance. Now mark it was not the ecclesia that was riotous, but ‘oklos’ —<br />

crowd that had rushed into the theater where the ecclesia assembly of Ephesus<br />

was in orderly session, or had gathered to hold one; for it was the ‘oklos,’ not<br />

the ecclesia, that the presiding officer of the ecclesia quieted. (See Acts<br />

19:35.) He informed this riotous, ‘oklos’ crowd, ‘if Demetrius and the<br />

workmen with him had a charge against any man, there were the courts and<br />

the proconsuls; but if it was about other things the ecclesia would settle it.’<br />

The ecclesia was responsible for public tumults, insurrections, etc., and the<br />

officer appealed to the crowd to be quiet and disperse, ‘for,’ said he, speaking<br />

for the ecclesia, ‘we are even in danger of being accused about the tumult of<br />

to-day, there being no cause by which we [the ecclesia] can excuse this<br />

concourse’ — sustrophes — not ecclesia. And having said this, he adjourned,<br />

dissolved, the assembly — ecclesia — not the sustrophes — mob — which he<br />

could not dismiss. Now, in this account, we have, in Greek, four terms used:<br />

‘demos,’ people; ‘oklos,’ crowd; ‘sustrophes,’ mob; ‘ecclesia,’ assembly — a<br />

body having civil jurisdiction. Ecclesia and sustrophes are never used<br />

interchangeably, never mean the same body.”<br />

Were we to admit that ecclesia here meant a “mob,” since the church in no way<br />

involves a mob, this passage has no bearing on what is the church. Liddell and<br />

Scott, in their Greek Lexicon, define the word, “ekklesia, an assembly of<br />

citizens summoned by the crier, the legislative assembly.”<br />

Dean Trench says:<br />

“Ekklesiaa, as all know, was the lawful assembly in a free Greek city of all<br />

those possessed of the rights of citizenship, for the transaction of public<br />

affairs. That they were summoned is expressed in the latter part of the word;<br />

that they were summoned out of the whole population, a select portion of it,<br />

including neither the populace, not yet strangers, nor those who had forfeited<br />

their civic rights — this is expressed in the first. Both the calling and the<br />

calling out, are moments to be remembered, when the word is assumed into a<br />

higher Christian sense, for in them the chief part of its peculiar adaptation to<br />

its auguster uses lie.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!