Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

compiler, who stated only what he found and attempted no manufacture of facts to complete his story. We are obliged to consult sidelights and outside testimony, therefore, and take it for what it is worth, according to the means of information enjoyed by contemporaneous and immediately succeeding witnesses. These are not numerous in this case, nor are they very satisfactory, because their testimony does not always agree, nor had they equal means of knowing whereof they spoke. Hence, several different theories have been put forth on the subject.” f866 In view of the foregoing, I will conclude the point, as to the records, in the language of the Journal and Messenger, of Cincinnati: “It will be seen from such accounts that it is very difficult to establish anything of this history, beyond a peradventure and that it is taking a good deal for granted to admit the claims of a church which kept no records for over one hundred years. In order that the First Baptist church of Providence may be regarded as the first in America, we have to proceed upon the Catholic system of fixing dates, etc., and argue that there must have been a first church, and since we cannot certainly fix upon any other as that one, then this was the best, and the indisputable claim. But we are not quite ready to adopt this method of settling historical claims.” The claim of the Williams church to have been the first Baptist church in America, is a late claim. Says Prof. J.C. C. Clarke, of Shurtleff College, in a most masterly review of the subject, after a thorough examination of the original records of these times: “A Mr. Lechford, having visited Providence about 1640, wrote: ‘At Providence lives Master Williams and his company of divers opinions; most are Anabaptists. They hold there is no true, visible church in the Bay, nor in the world, nor any true ministry.’ A hundred years later, the oldest residents of Providence were ignorant of any tradition that Roger Williams was the founder or a member of the Baptist church there.” f867 Thus we see that even the tradition upon which the claim of the Providence church rests is perfectly worthless, in that it originated over a century after the time in which it is claimed Williams originated that church, and that the claim of that church originated a century later than the disputed dates of origin for the Providence and Newport churches. Mr. Adlam, one of the highest authorities on this subject, says: “The general opinion of Roger Williams being the founder and pastor of the first Baptist church, is a modern theory; the farther you go back, the less generally it is believed; till coming to the most ancient times, to the men who knew Williams, they are such entire strangers to it, that they never heard that he formed the Baptist church there. The first, and the second and the third, and almost the fourth generation must pass away before men can believe that

any others than Wickenden, Brown, etc., were the founders of that church.” f868 Facts as to Roger Williams and his so-called church. First. Williams, while a Baptist in some points, was not a Baptist in so many others, that he never was a Baptist in an ecclesiastical sense. Instead of any orderly Baptist church recognizing any one as a Baptist, who had let an unbaptized man who was a member of no church, baptize him, and then, he in turn, had baptized his baptizer, and, thus originated a church, it would unhesitatingly refuse him any church fellowship, and disown his acts. Yet this is the history of Roger Williams’ baptism and socalled church. If possible, Williams’ course is still more inexcusable in view of the fact that Baptist administrators could more easily have been procured from England than the charter he assisted John Clarke to get from there. Why did he not, if he was a Baptist, do like Spilsbury’s church of London, or Oncken, of Germany — send off and get the true baptism? Yea, worse and worse, why did he not get John Clarke or Hansard Knollys to baptize him, as they were on the ground? Cramp says: “Hansard Knollys was then preaching at Dover … and was one of the ‘godly Anabaptists’ mentioned by Cotton Mather.” f869 Knollys was a graduate of the University of Cambridge. As a Baptist minister of London, after returning there, often preaching to an audience. of one thousand hearers. Of Knollys’ coming to America, Backus says: “Persecuted in England he fled to America. Forbidden at once to remain in Massachusetts he went to Piscataqua, soon afterwards called Dover. Here he met with immediate opposition, but according to Winthrop (vol. 1, p. 326) ‘he gathered some of the best minded into a church body and became their pastor.’” f870 Rev. C.E. Barrows says: “We are informed that there were Baptists among the first settlers of Massachusetts Bay,” f871 This statement is made on the authority of Cotton Mather. As we have seen, in the case of Williams, Clarke and Knollys, Baptists, to escape persecution for their opposition to infant baptism, fled to Rhode Island, where they had liberty. Settling in Newport, Clarke would find Baptist material which his faithfulness as a preacher must have immediately organized into a Baptist church.” f873 “Mr. Hansard Knollys was minister there from the spring of 1638 to the fall of 1641.” f874 The church was traduced from without and was rent with dissension within, and its pastor returned to England.” f875 Cramp, after confirming the above, adds:

any others than Wickenden, Brown, etc., were the founders of that church.”<br />

f868<br />

Facts as to Roger Williams and his so-called church. First. Williams, while a<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong> in some points, was not a <strong>Baptist</strong> in so many others, that he never was<br />

a <strong>Baptist</strong> in an ecclesiastical sense. Instead of any orderly <strong>Baptist</strong> church<br />

recognizing any one as a <strong>Baptist</strong>, who had let an unbaptized man who was a<br />

member of no church, baptize him, and then, he in turn, had baptized his<br />

baptizer, and, thus originated a church, it would unhesitatingly refuse him any<br />

church fellowship, and disown his acts. Yet this is the history of Roger<br />

Williams’ baptism and socalled church. If possible, Williams’ course is still<br />

more inexcusable in view of the fact that <strong>Baptist</strong> administrators could more<br />

easily have been procured from England than the charter he assisted John<br />

Clarke to get from there. Why did he not, if he was a <strong>Baptist</strong>, do like<br />

Spilsbury’s church of London, or Oncken, of Germany — send off and get the<br />

true baptism? Yea, worse and worse, why did he not get John Clarke or<br />

Hansard Knollys to baptize him, as they were on the ground? Cramp says:<br />

“Hansard Knollys was then preaching at Dover … and was one of the ‘godly<br />

Anabaptists’ mentioned by Cotton Mather.” f869<br />

Knollys was a graduate of the University of Cambridge. As a <strong>Baptist</strong> minister<br />

of London, after returning there, often preaching to an audience. of one<br />

thousand hearers. Of Knollys’ coming to America, Backus says:<br />

“Persecuted in England he fled to America. Forbidden at once to remain in<br />

Massachusetts he went to Piscataqua, soon afterwards called Dover. Here he<br />

met with immediate opposition, but according to Winthrop (vol. 1, p. 326) ‘he<br />

gathered some of the best minded into a church body and became their<br />

pastor.’” f870<br />

Rev. C.E. Barrows says: “We are informed that there were <strong>Baptist</strong>s among the<br />

first settlers of Massachusetts Bay,” f871 This statement is made on the authority<br />

of Cotton Mather.<br />

As we have seen, in the case of Williams, Clarke and Knollys, <strong>Baptist</strong>s, to<br />

escape persecution for their opposition to infant baptism, fled to Rhode Island,<br />

where they had liberty. Settling in Newport, Clarke would find <strong>Baptist</strong><br />

material which his faithfulness as a preacher must have immediately organized<br />

into a <strong>Baptist</strong> church.” f873 “Mr. Hansard Knollys was minister there from the<br />

spring of 1638 to the fall of 1641.” f874 The church was traduced from without<br />

and was rent with dissension within, and its pastor returned to England.” f875<br />

Cramp, after confirming the above, adds:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!