Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Armitage says: “All these are scions of what was transplanted out of Holland in the year 1535, when two ships laden with Anabaptists fled into England. … here it seems they have remained ever since.” f835 This is an adopted quotation from a “History of Anabaptists of High and Low Germany,” written in 1642, “now among the Kings’ Pamphlets.” Barclay also reports that in 1536 ‘Anabaptist societies in England sent a delegation to a great gathering of their brethren in Westphalia. It appears, therefore, that the origin of English Baptists, as a distinct sect, is to be found among the English Baptist refugees who were driven from the Netherlands.” f835 Here see my previous chapter on English Baptists before and at the time of John Smyth, which proves Baptists in England long before and up to 1535. Crosby says of Smyth: “If he were guilty of what they charge him with, it is no blemish on the English Baptists, who neither approved of any such method, nor did they receive their baptism from him.” f836 Dr. Smith, editor of The Standard at Chicago, formerly Lecturer on Church History to the Chicago Baptist Theological Seminary, says: “As we have said on former occasions, John Smyth is not counted on as one of the founders of the Baptist denomination.” f837 Well did “Hercules Collins, a Baptist minister of Wapping,” England, in a work published in 1691, say of the English Baptists having received their baptism from John Smyth: “It is absolutely untrue, it being well known to some who are yet alive how false this assertion is; and if J.W. will but give a meeting to any of us, and bring whom he pleases with him, we shall sufficiently show the falsity of what is asserted by him in this matter, and in many other things which he hath unchristianly asserted.” f838
CHAPTER 25. — THROUGH WELSH BAPTISTS, BAPTISTS HAVE A CONTINUITY FROM APOSTOLIC TIMES TO THE PRESENT. Armitage quotes from Thomas’ History of the Welsh Baptists: “The first Baptist church in Wales, AFTER the Reformation, was found at Ilston, near Swansea, in Glamorganshire, in 1649. … It was under the commonwealth that Vavasor Powell, Jenkin Jones and Hugh Evans formed the first Open Communion Baptist churches in Wales, and that John Miles formed the first Strict Communion churches there. The first Welsh Baptist association was organized in 1651.” f839 These words, so carelessly chosen, have given an excuse for Baptist opponents to claim that this was the origin of Welsh Baptists. But, in connection with this statement, Armitage says: “Davis, Bishop of Monmouth, finds a wide difference between the christianity of the ancient Britons and that of Austin in 596. The first followed the word of God, the other was mixed with human tradition. Dr. Fulk denied that Austin was the apostle of England, and charged him with corrupting the true christianity which he found in Britain, by Romish admixture. Fabin, himself a Catholic, shows that he imposed sundry things upon the Britons, which were refused as contrary to the doctrine which they had at first received. Bede says that the Culdees followed the Bible only and opposed the superstitions of Rome. Culdee, from Culdu, is a compound Welsh word, cul, thin, du, black; and means a thin, dark man, as their mountaineers, who were noted for their godliness. The monks got possession of the Culdee colleges by degrees, and continued to preach without forming churches. Some claiming that the Welsh Baptists sprang from the sturdy stock; for individuals are found in Glamorgan, the Black Mountains, Hereford and Brecon counties, who walked apart from Rome before the Reformation. Stephens, the late antiquarian of Merthyr, thought that the bards of Chavi of Glamorgan kept up a secret concourse with the Albigenses. This is probable, as some of them were conversant with the Italian poets. “‘Holy Rhys,’ famous in 1390, was learned, and his wife was of the new faith,’ (Lollard), for his son, Ieuan, was expelled from the Margam Monastary for holding their opinions, or ‘on account of his religion.’ His grandson also was imprisoned by Sir Cradoe for being of the ‘new faith’. … The Lollards swarmed in Wales, where Old Castle hid for four years after escaping from the Tower. He was a native of the Welsh Cottian Alps, the Black Mountains, having been born at Old Castle about 1360.
- Page 195 and 196: events as to deny that traditional
- Page 197 and 198: deserved his surname by residing am
- Page 199 and 200: we have demonstrated, the names are
- Page 201 and 202: Baptists. Keller insists throughout
- Page 203 and 204: (6.) While Waldo may have been the
- Page 205 and 206: CHAPTER 22. — THE WALDENSES PERPE
- Page 207 and 208: Peter de Bruis and Henry — “But
- Page 209 and 210: first propagandists on Holland soil
- Page 211 and 212: Dr. Limborch, Professor in the Univ
- Page 213 and 214: “It is well known that the Anabap
- Page 215 and 216: As explanatory, says Armitage: “A
- Page 217 and 218: Let it not be forgotten that I have
- Page 219 and 220: continued from the times of the Apo
- Page 221 and 222: There is no record of Baptists havi
- Page 223 and 224: William R. Williams, says: “Raste
- Page 225 and 226: enefit. Thieves and vagabonds share
- Page 227 and 228: “History has for them no word of
- Page 229 and 230: there were many Baptist CHURCHES in
- Page 231 and 232: least a hundred years prior to the
- Page 233 and 234: Queen Elizabeth reigned from 1558 t
- Page 235 and 236: of Baptist principles are the demon
- Page 237 and 238: (7.) Laying all this aside, I have
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 24. — JOHN SMYTH’S BAPT
- Page 241 and 242: thereof. Now it is reason-able to c
- Page 243 and 244: Smith Watson, and now we cannot, at
- Page 245: Orchard’s suggestion, that Spilsb
- Page 249 and 250: In the year 603, Augustine, called
- Page 251 and 252: “The vale of Olchon is difficult
- Page 253 and 254: earth can tell where the church was
- Page 255 and 256: Says Cramp: “A church was immedia
- Page 257 and 258: any others than Wickenden, Brown, e
- Page 259 and 260: Armitage says: “In view of the fa
- Page 261 and 262: No church or minister ever originat
- Page 263 and 264: Brown, Wickenden and Dexter. … Th
- Page 265 and 266: “The first certain date in their
- Page 267 and 268: Massachusetts Baptist churches thus
- Page 269 and 270: “In the year 1751, Mr. Nicholas B
- Page 271 and 272: Christian era. … He had little ec
- Page 273 and 274: organized before Williams’ church
- Page 275 and 276: fellowship any who should do these
- Page 277 and 278: (3.) To assist those members that s
- Page 279 and 280: pleased the Lord to stir up their h
- Page 281 and 282: “agreed that the churches should
- Page 283 and 284: Silas Hart, 1795, died and left to
- Page 285 and 286: letters desiring the aid of this bo
- Page 287 and 288: “Elder James Osborne was a member
- Page 289 and 290: As there is no difference in doctri
- Page 291 and 292: So, without looking into their othe
- Page 293 and 294: laid on infant baptism. … We are
- Page 295 and 296: church. … I cannot be conscientio
Armitage says:<br />
“All these are scions of what was transplanted out of Holland in the year<br />
1535, when two ships laden with Anabaptists fled into England. … here it<br />
seems they have remained ever since.” f835<br />
This is an adopted quotation from a “History of Anabaptists of High and Low<br />
Germany,” written in 1642, “now among the Kings’ Pamphlets.” Barclay also<br />
reports that in 1536 ‘Anabaptist societies in England sent a delegation to a<br />
great gathering of their brethren in Westphalia. It appears, therefore, that the<br />
origin of English <strong>Baptist</strong>s, as a distinct sect, is to be found among the English<br />
<strong>Baptist</strong> refugees who were driven from the Netherlands.” f835<br />
Here see my previous chapter on English <strong>Baptist</strong>s before and at the time of<br />
John Smyth, which proves <strong>Baptist</strong>s in England long before and up to 1535.<br />
Crosby says of Smyth:<br />
“If he were guilty of what they charge him with, it is no blemish on the<br />
English <strong>Baptist</strong>s, who neither approved of any such method, nor did they<br />
receive their baptism from him.” f836<br />
Dr. Smith, editor of The Standard at Chicago, formerly Lecturer on <strong>Church</strong><br />
History to the Chicago <strong>Baptist</strong> Theological Seminary, says:<br />
“As we have said on former occasions, John Smyth is not counted on as one<br />
of the founders of the <strong>Baptist</strong> denomination.” f837<br />
Well did “Hercules Collins, a <strong>Baptist</strong> minister of Wapping,” England, in a<br />
work published in 1691, say of the English <strong>Baptist</strong>s having received their<br />
baptism from John Smyth:<br />
“It is absolutely untrue, it being well known to some who are yet alive how<br />
false this assertion is; and if J.W. will but give a meeting to any of us, and<br />
bring whom he pleases with him, we shall sufficiently show the falsity of<br />
what is asserted by him in this matter, and in many other things which he hath<br />
unchristianly asserted.” f838