Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

nearly all night with Elders Henry Helwisse and John Morton, who defended our cause well.’ Not yet, however, was he convinced, but after three months’ reflection, his mind had advanced beyond the position of the Separatists. He had, says the Church Book, ‘consulted the Scriptures and admitted that he was deceived in the way of Pedobaptistry,’ and ‘so, embraced the faith in a true christian and apostolic baptism,’ and on the 24th of March, 1606, at midnight, to avoid the satellites of the persecuting Church, and under the glare of the torchlight, ‘he was baptized by Elder John Morton, in the River Don, and then walked to Epworth, a distance of two miles in his wet clothes.’” Dr. Clifford says: “The church book from whence this statement is taken about John Symth’s baptism, belonged to the church at Epworth and Crowle, in Lincoln-shire. The Rev. Jabez Stuttered, minister at Epworth and Crowle, heard his deacons speak of the existence of this work; and being interested, found that it was in the possession of Rev. Smith Watson, a minister at Butterwick, hard by. He obtained a sight of it, and discovered that it consisted of a few moth eaten leaves, which had been given to Mr. Smith Watson by an old Baptist family of the district, who met with it in an old chest many years before. Mr. Stuttered thought the pages might be of value, and the opinion of an expert a skilled antiquarian, of the district, was sought and he reported as follows: ‘NOVEMBER 9th, 1866. ‘As keeper of the Manor Charts of North Lincoln-shire, I have examined the old Baptist Records, and believe them to refer to the last days of Queen Elizabeth and James the First. And recommend the friends connected with the Baptist cause, to quickly copy them or they will surely vanish away.’ ‘F. CHAPMAN, Antiquarian.’” The book was guarded with jealous care, but at the request of the deacons, and with their aid, Mr. Stuttered made a number of extracts, and after some time forwarded them to me. I was surprised at their contents, and especially at the statement concerning John Smyth’s baptism, and asked to see the original; meanwhile Smith Watson had deceased, and the book could not be found. Search has been made again and again, but, at present in vain. The following document bears date December the 16th, 1879: “We, the undersigned deacons of the Baptist church at Butterwick, Epworth, Crowle, having seen and handled the Old Records of seven or eight loaves, long before Rev. J. Stuttered came into the country, and at our request and desire, and with our assistance he copied the same moth-eaten records, We, as a church, tendered him our sincere thanks and requested him to send them to the editor of the General Baptist Magazine for insertion. When copied they were taken back to Butterwick, and consigned to the care of the late Rev.

Smith Watson, and now we cannot, at present, place our hands on the document, or it would have been sent for Mr. Clifford’s inspection. ANDERSON HIND, PETER GLOSSOP, JOHN CHAPMAN, BENJAMIN BATTY, GEORGE SINCLAIR, THOMAS SMITH, WM. CHAMBERLAIN.” f821 (6.) Were we to admit this slander on John Smyth, and that the error was not corrected it effects but few of the Baptists: (a.) Because there were Baptists in England before the time of Smyth. (b.) Because, at the time of his baptism, there were Baptist churches near him. Armitage says that the “Dutch Baptists of London rallied around Helwys and John Murton, his successor” — Smyth’s successors. f822 By the way, who can believe the Dutch Baptists would have given this help to Smyth’s church had it originated as Baptist enemies allege? Of the origin of what is generally regarded the Particular Baptists of England, Neal’s History of the Puri-tans says: “When, after long search, and many debates, it appeared to them that infant baptism was a mere innovation, and even a profanation of a divine ordinance, they were not brought to lay it aside without many fears and tremblings. … They were persuaded that believers were the only proper subjects of baptism, and that immersion or dipping the whole body into water was the appointed rite. But as this was not practiced in England” — a great mistake of Mr. Neal, originating with the little then known of Baptists — “they were at a loss for an administrator to begin with. After often meeting together to pray and confer about this matter, they agreed to send over into Holland Mr. Richard Blount, who understood the Dutch language, to a Baptist church there; he was kindly received by the society and their pastor and upon his return he baptized Mr. Samuel Blacklock, a minister; these two baptized the rest of the company, to the number of fifty-three. Some few others of this persuasion were among the original planters of New England.” f823 Thus an eminent Pedobaptist historian established the “succession” of English Baptists through the Baptists of Holland who were the original Waldenses and their descendants. Vedder, notwithstanding all his prejudice, admits this account as true, and pronounces the baptism of the English Baptist as henceforth correct. f824 W. W. Everts, Jr., a very high authority on church history, severely criticises Dr. Dexter for giving so little attention to this, which was in order to discredit the Baptists through John Smyth, and says, of one of his false statements: “I cannot account for such a statement except by supposing an animus in the

nearly all night with Elders Henry Helwisse and John Morton, who defended<br />

our cause well.’ Not yet, however, was he convinced, but after three months’<br />

reflection, his mind had advanced beyond the position of the Separatists. He<br />

had, says the <strong>Church</strong> Book, ‘consulted the Scriptures and admitted that he was<br />

deceived in the way of Pedobaptistry,’ and ‘so, embraced the faith in a true<br />

christian and apostolic baptism,’ and on the 24th of March, 1606, at midnight,<br />

to avoid the satellites of the persecuting <strong>Church</strong>, and under the glare of the<br />

torchlight, ‘he was baptized by Elder John Morton, in the River Don, and then<br />

walked to Epworth, a distance of two miles in his wet clothes.’”<br />

Dr. Clifford says:<br />

“The church book from whence this statement is taken about John Symth’s<br />

baptism, belonged to the church at Epworth and Crowle, in Lincoln-shire. The<br />

Rev. Jabez Stuttered, minister at Epworth and Crowle, heard his deacons<br />

speak of the existence of this work; and being interested, found that it was in<br />

the possession of Rev. Smith Watson, a minister at Butterwick, hard by. He<br />

obtained a sight of it, and discovered that it consisted of a few moth eaten<br />

leaves, which had been given to Mr. Smith Watson by an old <strong>Baptist</strong> family<br />

of the district, who met with it in an old chest many years before. Mr.<br />

Stuttered thought the pages might be of value, and the opinion of an expert a<br />

skilled antiquarian, of the district, was sought and he reported as follows:<br />

‘NOVEMBER 9th, 1866.<br />

‘As keeper of the Manor Charts of North Lincoln-shire, I have examined the<br />

old <strong>Baptist</strong> Records, and believe them to refer to the last days of Queen<br />

Elizabeth and James the First. And recommend the friends connected with the<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong> cause, to quickly copy them or they will surely vanish away.’<br />

‘F. CHAPMAN, Antiquarian.’”<br />

The book was guarded with jealous care, but at the request of the deacons, and<br />

with their aid, Mr. Stuttered made a number of extracts, and after some time<br />

forwarded them to me. I was surprised at their contents, and especially at the<br />

statement concerning John Smyth’s baptism, and asked to see the original;<br />

meanwhile Smith Watson had deceased, and the book could not be found.<br />

Search has been made again and again, but, at present in vain. The following<br />

document bears date December the 16th, 1879:<br />

“We, the undersigned deacons of the <strong>Baptist</strong> church at Butterwick, Epworth,<br />

Crowle, having seen and handled the Old Records of seven or eight loaves,<br />

long before Rev. J. Stuttered came into the country, and at our request and<br />

desire, and with our assistance he copied the same moth-eaten records, We, as<br />

a church, tendered him our sincere thanks and requested him to send them to<br />

the editor of the General <strong>Baptist</strong> Magazine for insertion. When copied they<br />

were taken back to Butterwick, and consigned to the care of the late Rev.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!