09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fourth proclamation “appointing Cranmer and eight others to make diligent<br />

search for Anabaptist men, books and letters.” f792<br />

Under this, Goadby says: “Like the Israelites in Egypt, ‘the more they were<br />

afflicted the more they multiplied and grew.’” f793 Under the reign of Edward<br />

VI, 1537-1548, Goadby says that in spite of their persecutions “their numbers<br />

increased.” Strype tells us that “their opinions were believed by honest<br />

meaning people;” and another writer affirms that the articles of religion issued<br />

just before the king’s death<br />

“were principally designed to vindicate the English Reformation from the slur<br />

and disgrace which the Anabaptists’ tenets had brought upon it, a clear proof<br />

that the <strong>Baptist</strong>s were at that period neither few nor unimportant.” f794<br />

Remember this was before John Smyth’s baptism.<br />

Of the English <strong>Baptist</strong>s, of the seventeeth century, Goadby says:<br />

“All these are scions of this stock of Anabaptism that was transplanted out of<br />

Holland in the year 1535, when two ships laden with Anabaptists fled into<br />

England, after they had missed the Enterprise at Amsterdam.” f795<br />

To add many other testimonies to the existence of <strong>Baptist</strong> churches in England<br />

long before and at the time of John Smyth’s baptism is an easy task. There is,<br />

to this, a most superabundantly overwhelming mass of proof. But I rather owe<br />

an explanation for having already produced such an avalanche of proof. That<br />

explanation is: Owing to John Smyth being so persistently thrown up to the<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong>s as the founder of English <strong>Baptist</strong> churches, I have given this vast<br />

amount of refuting proof to silence forever every honest man who has been<br />

throwing John Smyth’s baptism up against <strong>Baptist</strong>s. In other words: This mass<br />

of testimony is given because so many think the English <strong>Baptist</strong>s, of the early<br />

part of the seventeenth century, were the first <strong>Baptist</strong> churches in England<br />

since very early times.<br />

There remain two objections or evasions. The first is: Is there proof that the<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong>s who antedated Smyth were organized into churches and that these<br />

churches were in existence in England when he was baptized?<br />

Notwithstanding that the foregoing shows this can be answered only in the<br />

affirmative, to not leave any possible room for doubt, I add the following:<br />

(1.) Just as the principles of a political party, of any secret society necessarily<br />

bring into organization their adherents, so <strong>Baptist</strong> principles organized their<br />

adherents into <strong>Baptist</strong> churches.<br />

(2.) Just as the principles of anything are dependent on organization for their<br />

perpetuity operation and dissemination, so the perpetuity and the dissemination

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!