Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

The late C.H. Spurgeon, in Ford’s Christian Repository, years ago, said: “We care very little for the ‘historical church’ argument, but if there be anything in it at all, it ought not to be filched by the clients of Rome, but should be left to that community, which all along held by ‘one Lord, one faith and one baptism.’ … The afflicted Anabaptists, in their past history, have had such fellowship with their suffering Lord, and have borne such pure testimony, both to truth and freedom, that they need in nothing be ashamed. … It would not be impossible to show that the first Christians who dwelt in the land were of the same faith and order as the churches now called Baptists. … The rampant ritualist, W.J. E. Bennett, of Frome, in his book upon ‘The Unity of the Church Broken,’ says: ‘The historian Lingard tells us there was a sect of fanatics who infested the north of Germany, called Puritans; Usher calls them Waldenses; Spelman, Paulicians (the same as Waldenses). They gained ground and spread over all England; they rejected all Romish ceremonies, denied the authority of the pope, and more particularly refused to baptize infants. Thirty of them were put to death for their heretical doctrines near Oxford; but the remainder still held on to their opinions in private until the time of Henry the II., 1550; and the historian, Collier, tells us that wherever the heresy prevailed, the churches were either scandalously neglected or pulled down and infants left unbaptized.’ We are obliged to Mr. Bennett for this history, which is in all respects authentic, and we take the liberty to remark upon it, that the reign of Henry the II. is a period far more worthy of being called remote than the reign of Henry the VIII. and if Baptists could trace their pedigree no further, the church of Thomas Crammer could not afford to sneer at them as a modern sect. … All along our history from Henry II. to Henry VIII. there are traces of the Anabaptists, who are usually mentioned in connection with the Lollards, or as coming from Holland. … All along there must have been a great hive on the Continent of these ‘reformers before the Reformation,’ for despite their being doomed to die almost as soon as they landed, they continued to invade this country to the annoyance of the priesthood and the hierarchy. … During the Reformation, and after it, the poor Anabaptists continued to be the victims. … The only stint allowed to persecution in the lower countries was contained in a letter to the Queen, Dowager Mary of Hungary, ‘care being only taken that the provinces were not entirely depopulated.’ … Latimer, who could not speak too badly of the Baptists, nevertheless bears witness to their numbers and intrepidity. Here I will tell you what I have heard of late, by the relation of a credible person and a worshipfy man, of a town in this realm of England, that hath above five hundred heretics of this erroneous opinion in it. … Bishop Burnett says that in the time of Edward the VI. Baptists became very numerous, and openly preached their doctrines, that ‘children are Christ’s with-out water.’ … Among the ‘Articles of Visitation,’ issued by Ridley in his own diocese in 1550, was the following: ‘Whether any of the Anabaptist sect and others use notoriously any unlawful or private conventicles wherein they do use doctrines or administration of sacraments, separating themselves from the rest of the parish.’ It may be fairly gathered from the ‘Articles of Visitation’ that

there were many Baptist CHURCHES in the kingdom at the time. This is also clear from the fact that the Duke of Northumberland advised that Mr. John Knox should be invited to England and made a bishop, that he might aid in putting down the Baptists in Kent.: “Marsden tells us that in the days of Elizabeth ‘the Anabaptists were the most numerous, and, for some time, by far the most formidable opponents of the church. They are said to have existed in England since the days of the Lollards.’ In the year 1575 a most severe persecution was raised against the Anabaptists of London, ten of whom were condemned, eight ordered to be banished and two to be executed. … Neither front Elizabeth, James or Charles the I. had our brethren any measure of favor. No treatment was thought to be too severe for them; even good men execrated them as heretics for whom the severest measures were too gentle. Had it been possible to destroy this branch of the true vine, assuredly the readiest means were used without hindrance or scruple. Yet it not only lives on, but continues to bear fruit a hundred fold … When Charles the I. was unable any longer to uphold episcopacy, liberty of thought and freedom of speech were somewhat more common than before, and the Baptists increased very rapidly. Many of them were in Cromwell’s army. … The time will probably arrive when history will be re-written.” Says Robinson: “I have seen enough to convince me that the present English dissenters, contending for the sufficiency of Scripture, and for primitive Christian liberty to judge of its meaning, may be traced in authentic manuscripts to the Nonconformists, to the Puritans, to the Lollards, to the Vallences, to the Albigenses, and, I suspect, through the Paulicians and others to the Apostles.” f767 Thus, an eminent secular historian says that he is convinced of the succession from the apostles of those whom my previous articles have proved were Baptist churches. Evans: “Dissidents from the popular church in the early ages … were found everywhere. Men of apostolic life and doctrine contended for the simplicity of the church and the liberty of Christ’s flock in the midst of great danger. … The Novatians, the Donatists and others that followed them are examples. … That these early separatists taught doctrines now held by the Baptists, might be made to appear from their own works and the statements of their adversaries. … A succession of able and intrepid men taught the same great principles in opposition to a corrupt and affluent State church, and many of these taught those peculiar views of Christian life and doctrine which are special to us as Baptists. Beyond all doubt such views were inculcated by the Paulicians, the primitive Waldenses and their brethren. Over Europe they were scattered and their converts were very numerous long before the Reformation.” f768

there were many <strong>Baptist</strong> CHURCHES in the kingdom at the time. This is also<br />

clear from the fact that the Duke of Northumberland advised that Mr. John<br />

Knox should be invited to England and made a bishop, that he might aid in<br />

putting down the <strong>Baptist</strong>s in Kent.: “Marsden tells us that in the days of<br />

Elizabeth ‘the Anabaptists were the most numerous, and, for some time, by<br />

far the most formidable opponents of the church. They are said to have<br />

existed in England since the days of the Lollards.’ In the year 1575 a most<br />

severe persecution was raised against the Anabaptists of London, ten of whom<br />

were condemned, eight ordered to be banished and two to be executed. …<br />

Neither front Elizabeth, James or Charles the I. had our brethren any measure<br />

of favor. No treatment was thought to be too severe for them; even good men<br />

execrated them as heretics for whom the severest measures were too gentle.<br />

Had it been possible to destroy this branch of the true vine, assuredly the<br />

readiest means were used without hindrance or scruple. Yet it not only lives<br />

on, but continues to bear fruit a hundred fold … When Charles the I. was<br />

unable any longer to uphold episcopacy, liberty of thought and freedom of<br />

speech were somewhat more common than before, and the <strong>Baptist</strong>s increased<br />

very rapidly. Many of them were in Cromwell’s army. … The time will<br />

probably arrive when history will be re-written.”<br />

Says Robinson:<br />

“I have seen enough to convince me that the present English dissenters,<br />

contending for the sufficiency of Scripture, and for primitive Christian liberty<br />

to judge of its meaning, may be traced in authentic manuscripts to the<br />

Nonconformists, to the Puritans, to the Lollards, to the Vallences, to the<br />

Albigenses, and, I suspect, through the Paulicians and others to the Apostles.”<br />

f767<br />

Thus, an eminent secular historian says that he is convinced of the succession<br />

from the apostles of those whom my previous articles have proved were<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong> churches.<br />

Evans:<br />

“Dissidents from the popular church in the early ages … were found<br />

everywhere. Men of apostolic life and doctrine contended for the simplicity of<br />

the church and the liberty of Christ’s flock in the midst of great danger. …<br />

The Novatians, the Donatists and others that followed them are examples. …<br />

That these early separatists taught doctrines now held by the <strong>Baptist</strong>s, might<br />

be made to appear from their own works and the statements of their<br />

adversaries. … A succession of able and intrepid men taught the same great<br />

principles in opposition to a corrupt and affluent State church, and many of<br />

these taught those peculiar views of Christian life and doctrine which are<br />

special to us as <strong>Baptist</strong>s. Beyond all doubt such views were inculcated by the<br />

Paulicians, the primitive Waldenses and their brethren. Over Europe they<br />

were scattered and their converts were very numerous long before the<br />

Reformation.” f768

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!