Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
The late C.H. Spurgeon, in Ford’s Christian Repository, years ago, said: “We care very little for the ‘historical church’ argument, but if there be anything in it at all, it ought not to be filched by the clients of Rome, but should be left to that community, which all along held by ‘one Lord, one faith and one baptism.’ … The afflicted Anabaptists, in their past history, have had such fellowship with their suffering Lord, and have borne such pure testimony, both to truth and freedom, that they need in nothing be ashamed. … It would not be impossible to show that the first Christians who dwelt in the land were of the same faith and order as the churches now called Baptists. … The rampant ritualist, W.J. E. Bennett, of Frome, in his book upon ‘The Unity of the Church Broken,’ says: ‘The historian Lingard tells us there was a sect of fanatics who infested the north of Germany, called Puritans; Usher calls them Waldenses; Spelman, Paulicians (the same as Waldenses). They gained ground and spread over all England; they rejected all Romish ceremonies, denied the authority of the pope, and more particularly refused to baptize infants. Thirty of them were put to death for their heretical doctrines near Oxford; but the remainder still held on to their opinions in private until the time of Henry the II., 1550; and the historian, Collier, tells us that wherever the heresy prevailed, the churches were either scandalously neglected or pulled down and infants left unbaptized.’ We are obliged to Mr. Bennett for this history, which is in all respects authentic, and we take the liberty to remark upon it, that the reign of Henry the II. is a period far more worthy of being called remote than the reign of Henry the VIII. and if Baptists could trace their pedigree no further, the church of Thomas Crammer could not afford to sneer at them as a modern sect. … All along our history from Henry II. to Henry VIII. there are traces of the Anabaptists, who are usually mentioned in connection with the Lollards, or as coming from Holland. … All along there must have been a great hive on the Continent of these ‘reformers before the Reformation,’ for despite their being doomed to die almost as soon as they landed, they continued to invade this country to the annoyance of the priesthood and the hierarchy. … During the Reformation, and after it, the poor Anabaptists continued to be the victims. … The only stint allowed to persecution in the lower countries was contained in a letter to the Queen, Dowager Mary of Hungary, ‘care being only taken that the provinces were not entirely depopulated.’ … Latimer, who could not speak too badly of the Baptists, nevertheless bears witness to their numbers and intrepidity. Here I will tell you what I have heard of late, by the relation of a credible person and a worshipfy man, of a town in this realm of England, that hath above five hundred heretics of this erroneous opinion in it. … Bishop Burnett says that in the time of Edward the VI. Baptists became very numerous, and openly preached their doctrines, that ‘children are Christ’s with-out water.’ … Among the ‘Articles of Visitation,’ issued by Ridley in his own diocese in 1550, was the following: ‘Whether any of the Anabaptist sect and others use notoriously any unlawful or private conventicles wherein they do use doctrines or administration of sacraments, separating themselves from the rest of the parish.’ It may be fairly gathered from the ‘Articles of Visitation’ that
there were many Baptist CHURCHES in the kingdom at the time. This is also clear from the fact that the Duke of Northumberland advised that Mr. John Knox should be invited to England and made a bishop, that he might aid in putting down the Baptists in Kent.: “Marsden tells us that in the days of Elizabeth ‘the Anabaptists were the most numerous, and, for some time, by far the most formidable opponents of the church. They are said to have existed in England since the days of the Lollards.’ In the year 1575 a most severe persecution was raised against the Anabaptists of London, ten of whom were condemned, eight ordered to be banished and two to be executed. … Neither front Elizabeth, James or Charles the I. had our brethren any measure of favor. No treatment was thought to be too severe for them; even good men execrated them as heretics for whom the severest measures were too gentle. Had it been possible to destroy this branch of the true vine, assuredly the readiest means were used without hindrance or scruple. Yet it not only lives on, but continues to bear fruit a hundred fold … When Charles the I. was unable any longer to uphold episcopacy, liberty of thought and freedom of speech were somewhat more common than before, and the Baptists increased very rapidly. Many of them were in Cromwell’s army. … The time will probably arrive when history will be re-written.” Says Robinson: “I have seen enough to convince me that the present English dissenters, contending for the sufficiency of Scripture, and for primitive Christian liberty to judge of its meaning, may be traced in authentic manuscripts to the Nonconformists, to the Puritans, to the Lollards, to the Vallences, to the Albigenses, and, I suspect, through the Paulicians and others to the Apostles.” f767 Thus, an eminent secular historian says that he is convinced of the succession from the apostles of those whom my previous articles have proved were Baptist churches. Evans: “Dissidents from the popular church in the early ages … were found everywhere. Men of apostolic life and doctrine contended for the simplicity of the church and the liberty of Christ’s flock in the midst of great danger. … The Novatians, the Donatists and others that followed them are examples. … That these early separatists taught doctrines now held by the Baptists, might be made to appear from their own works and the statements of their adversaries. … A succession of able and intrepid men taught the same great principles in opposition to a corrupt and affluent State church, and many of these taught those peculiar views of Christian life and doctrine which are special to us as Baptists. Beyond all doubt such views were inculcated by the Paulicians, the primitive Waldenses and their brethren. Over Europe they were scattered and their converts were very numerous long before the Reformation.” f768
- Page 177 and 178: “Haeriticus est omnis non orthodo
- Page 179 and 180: “The Bogomiles were a branch of t
- Page 181 and 182: teachings of Peter de Bruys, and it
- Page 183 and 184: CHAPTER 21. — THE WALDENSES OF AP
- Page 185 and 186: Sylvester, 314 to 335 A.D. and acco
- Page 187 and 188: accept the testimony of the ‘Cath
- Page 189 and 190: efore Waldo, let them prove it,”
- Page 191 and 192: certain professors of church histor
- Page 193 and 194: history, with a genuine Waldensian
- Page 195 and 196: events as to deny that traditional
- Page 197 and 198: deserved his surname by residing am
- Page 199 and 200: we have demonstrated, the names are
- Page 201 and 202: Baptists. Keller insists throughout
- Page 203 and 204: (6.) While Waldo may have been the
- Page 205 and 206: CHAPTER 22. — THE WALDENSES PERPE
- Page 207 and 208: Peter de Bruis and Henry — “But
- Page 209 and 210: first propagandists on Holland soil
- Page 211 and 212: Dr. Limborch, Professor in the Univ
- Page 213 and 214: “It is well known that the Anabap
- Page 215 and 216: As explanatory, says Armitage: “A
- Page 217 and 218: Let it not be forgotten that I have
- Page 219 and 220: continued from the times of the Apo
- Page 221 and 222: There is no record of Baptists havi
- Page 223 and 224: William R. Williams, says: “Raste
- Page 225 and 226: enefit. Thieves and vagabonds share
- Page 227: “History has for them no word of
- Page 231 and 232: least a hundred years prior to the
- Page 233 and 234: Queen Elizabeth reigned from 1558 t
- Page 235 and 236: of Baptist principles are the demon
- Page 237 and 238: (7.) Laying all this aside, I have
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 24. — JOHN SMYTH’S BAPT
- Page 241 and 242: thereof. Now it is reason-able to c
- Page 243 and 244: Smith Watson, and now we cannot, at
- Page 245 and 246: Orchard’s suggestion, that Spilsb
- Page 247 and 248: CHAPTER 25. — THROUGH WELSH BAPTI
- Page 249 and 250: In the year 603, Augustine, called
- Page 251 and 252: “The vale of Olchon is difficult
- Page 253 and 254: earth can tell where the church was
- Page 255 and 256: Says Cramp: “A church was immedia
- Page 257 and 258: any others than Wickenden, Brown, e
- Page 259 and 260: Armitage says: “In view of the fa
- Page 261 and 262: No church or minister ever originat
- Page 263 and 264: Brown, Wickenden and Dexter. … Th
- Page 265 and 266: “The first certain date in their
- Page 267 and 268: Massachusetts Baptist churches thus
- Page 269 and 270: “In the year 1751, Mr. Nicholas B
- Page 271 and 272: Christian era. … He had little ec
- Page 273 and 274: organized before Williams’ church
- Page 275 and 276: fellowship any who should do these
- Page 277 and 278: (3.) To assist those members that s
there were many <strong>Baptist</strong> CHURCHES in the kingdom at the time. This is also<br />
clear from the fact that the Duke of Northumberland advised that Mr. John<br />
Knox should be invited to England and made a bishop, that he might aid in<br />
putting down the <strong>Baptist</strong>s in Kent.: “Marsden tells us that in the days of<br />
Elizabeth ‘the Anabaptists were the most numerous, and, for some time, by<br />
far the most formidable opponents of the church. They are said to have<br />
existed in England since the days of the Lollards.’ In the year 1575 a most<br />
severe persecution was raised against the Anabaptists of London, ten of whom<br />
were condemned, eight ordered to be banished and two to be executed. …<br />
Neither front Elizabeth, James or Charles the I. had our brethren any measure<br />
of favor. No treatment was thought to be too severe for them; even good men<br />
execrated them as heretics for whom the severest measures were too gentle.<br />
Had it been possible to destroy this branch of the true vine, assuredly the<br />
readiest means were used without hindrance or scruple. Yet it not only lives<br />
on, but continues to bear fruit a hundred fold … When Charles the I. was<br />
unable any longer to uphold episcopacy, liberty of thought and freedom of<br />
speech were somewhat more common than before, and the <strong>Baptist</strong>s increased<br />
very rapidly. Many of them were in Cromwell’s army. … The time will<br />
probably arrive when history will be re-written.”<br />
Says Robinson:<br />
“I have seen enough to convince me that the present English dissenters,<br />
contending for the sufficiency of Scripture, and for primitive Christian liberty<br />
to judge of its meaning, may be traced in authentic manuscripts to the<br />
Nonconformists, to the Puritans, to the Lollards, to the Vallences, to the<br />
Albigenses, and, I suspect, through the Paulicians and others to the Apostles.”<br />
f767<br />
Thus, an eminent secular historian says that he is convinced of the succession<br />
from the apostles of those whom my previous articles have proved were<br />
<strong>Baptist</strong> churches.<br />
Evans:<br />
“Dissidents from the popular church in the early ages … were found<br />
everywhere. Men of apostolic life and doctrine contended for the simplicity of<br />
the church and the liberty of Christ’s flock in the midst of great danger. …<br />
The Novatians, the Donatists and others that followed them are examples. …<br />
That these early separatists taught doctrines now held by the <strong>Baptist</strong>s, might<br />
be made to appear from their own works and the statements of their<br />
adversaries. … A succession of able and intrepid men taught the same great<br />
principles in opposition to a corrupt and affluent State church, and many of<br />
these taught those peculiar views of Christian life and doctrine which are<br />
special to us as <strong>Baptist</strong>s. Beyond all doubt such views were inculcated by the<br />
Paulicians, the primitive Waldenses and their brethren. Over Europe they<br />
were scattered and their converts were very numerous long before the<br />
Reformation.” f768