Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
mentioning many similar cases of their great numbers shown in their persecutions.” In Moravia, where the Baptists for a long time found protectors, persecution began in 1528. … A recent opponent of the Baptists, the Church historian, Carl Hase, expresses his opinion concerning these events in these word: “The energy, the capacity for suffering, the joy in believing, which characterized the Christians of the first centuries of the church reappeared in the Ana-baptists.’ Indeed, one can not but be astonished at the steadfastness of these men, who so joyfully went to death, and disdained to purchase life by a word of recantation. Only once, at the time of Roman persecution of the Christians, does the entire history of the Christian church furnish an example of such slaughter. … Not to speak of the Netherlands, where at the beginning of 1530, according to the words of a contemporary, there was hardly a village or a city in which the danger of revolution on the part of the Baptists did not seem to be imminent. Let us now turn our attention to the German provinces. … The more I examine the documents of that time, at my command, the more I am astonished at the extent of the diffusion of Anabaptist views, an extent of which no other investigator has any knowledge. In all the cities in the archbishopric, with scarcely one or two exceptions, there were Anabaptists, and even in the country towns and villages. The same was true of the neighboring districts. … Many Baptist churches cannot be enumerated for the reason that their existence was a profound secret. … For the details I refer to original documents cited by me in another place, and will here only refer to the fact, that in the evangelical cities, Bremen, Hamburg, Lubec, Wisemar, Rostock, Stralsund, Brunswick, Hanover, Lunebury, etc., it can be proved that there were either fully established churches, or, at least, individual Baptists (and that, too, many among the clergy). It is not to be doubted, also, that in the progress of scientific invention still farther traces will be brought to light. … Much rather can it be proved that in the lands mentioned Baptist churches existed for many decades and EVEN CENTURIES.” f707 Dr. A.H. Newman, a high authority on this subject, says: “It may be permitted to the writer to say that he is in thorough sympathy with Keller’s general view of the old evangelical party and of the Reformation of the sixteenth century. f708 The reader will please especially not over-look the latter part of Keller’s statement, in my last quotation from him, that instead of saying that like other non-Catholic sects, Baptists are the children of the Reformation, he says and has given ample proof of the statement, of their great prevalence when the Reformation began: ‘Baptist churches existed for many decades and even centuries’ before the Reformation.” Dr. E.T. Winkler says:
“It is well known that the Anabaptists of Holland disclaimed any historic connection with the fanatical Anabaptists of Germany, but claimed a descent from the Waldenses.” f709 Dr. Howard Osgood: “In Switzerland and in Germany it has been found impossible to decide when the Baptists first appeared, or which were the first churches of Baptists in these lands; and it is quite as difficult to decide the question about the Baptists of England.” f710 In the same paper, Dr. Osgood says of the Anabaptists of the sixteenth century: “The persecution of centuries had taught them concealment,” plainly implying their existence centuries before the days of Luther. … “When they first appeared in the Netherlands cannot be decided. Ypeij and Dermout say Anabaptists were according to the archives of Groningen expelled thence in 1517.” Here, Dr. Osgood quotes from Prof. Van Oesterzee, in Herzog Encyclopedia 9, p. 346 — “They are peculiar to the Netherlands and are older than the Reformation, and therefore must by no means be confounded with the Protestantism of the sixteenth centuries, for it can be shown that the origin of the Baptists reaches much farther back and is more venerable.” Dr. Osgood, in the same paper, says: “Long before Menno was converted and became a Baptist, Baptists were found in the Netherlands and were united in churches from the borders of France to the northern bounds of Friesland and witnessed a good confession.” Dr. G.C. Lorimer in the same paper, of the Baptists and the Reformation, says: “Their existence antedates it by centuries. … In 1518, six years before Luther appeared before the Diet of Worms, a letter was addressed to Erasmus from Bohemia, describing a people who never had any affinity with Rome. Two of these brethren waited on Luther and Erasmus to congratulate them on their secession from Rome, but the same were declined because they were Anabaptists. … It may be possible to show, as I think it is, that primitive Christianity perpetuated itself in the Novatian communities which, according to Kertz, prevailed ‘almost throughout the Roman empire and which were subsequently known as Donatists, Montanists, bodies of believers who are classed together by Alzog, Abrard, Herzog, Jacobi and Frike and with whom the Baptists of our day are in substantial accord. … All this could be very likely substantiated and an unbroken succession established.” Cardinal Hossius, President of the Council of Trent, which met Dec. 15, 1545, and one of the most learned Romanists of his day, said:
- Page 161 and 162: once deeply imbibed, blinds the eye
- Page 163 and 164: put to a bloody slaughter for their
- Page 165 and 166: destructive fanaticism with which a
- Page 167 and 168: “The plebeian sect of the Anabapt
- Page 169 and 170: Moller: “Condemned in Rome, Monta
- Page 171 and 172: “They had not become extinct when
- Page 173 and 174: Novatians and the Donatists, which
- Page 175 and 176: CHAPTER 20. — THE BAPTIST CHURCH
- Page 177 and 178: “Haeriticus est omnis non orthodo
- Page 179 and 180: “The Bogomiles were a branch of t
- Page 181 and 182: teachings of Peter de Bruys, and it
- Page 183 and 184: CHAPTER 21. — THE WALDENSES OF AP
- Page 185 and 186: Sylvester, 314 to 335 A.D. and acco
- Page 187 and 188: accept the testimony of the ‘Cath
- Page 189 and 190: efore Waldo, let them prove it,”
- Page 191 and 192: certain professors of church histor
- Page 193 and 194: history, with a genuine Waldensian
- Page 195 and 196: events as to deny that traditional
- Page 197 and 198: deserved his surname by residing am
- Page 199 and 200: we have demonstrated, the names are
- Page 201 and 202: Baptists. Keller insists throughout
- Page 203 and 204: (6.) While Waldo may have been the
- Page 205 and 206: CHAPTER 22. — THE WALDENSES PERPE
- Page 207 and 208: Peter de Bruis and Henry — “But
- Page 209 and 210: first propagandists on Holland soil
- Page 211: Dr. Limborch, Professor in the Univ
- Page 215 and 216: As explanatory, says Armitage: “A
- Page 217 and 218: Let it not be forgotten that I have
- Page 219 and 220: continued from the times of the Apo
- Page 221 and 222: There is no record of Baptists havi
- Page 223 and 224: William R. Williams, says: “Raste
- Page 225 and 226: enefit. Thieves and vagabonds share
- Page 227 and 228: “History has for them no word of
- Page 229 and 230: there were many Baptist CHURCHES in
- Page 231 and 232: least a hundred years prior to the
- Page 233 and 234: Queen Elizabeth reigned from 1558 t
- Page 235 and 236: of Baptist principles are the demon
- Page 237 and 238: (7.) Laying all this aside, I have
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 24. — JOHN SMYTH’S BAPT
- Page 241 and 242: thereof. Now it is reason-able to c
- Page 243 and 244: Smith Watson, and now we cannot, at
- Page 245 and 246: Orchard’s suggestion, that Spilsb
- Page 247 and 248: CHAPTER 25. — THROUGH WELSH BAPTI
- Page 249 and 250: In the year 603, Augustine, called
- Page 251 and 252: “The vale of Olchon is difficult
- Page 253 and 254: earth can tell where the church was
- Page 255 and 256: Says Cramp: “A church was immedia
- Page 257 and 258: any others than Wickenden, Brown, e
- Page 259 and 260: Armitage says: “In view of the fa
- Page 261 and 262: No church or minister ever originat
mentioning many similar cases of their great numbers shown in their<br />
persecutions.”<br />
In Moravia, where the <strong>Baptist</strong>s for a long time found protectors, persecution<br />
began in 1528. … A recent opponent of the <strong>Baptist</strong>s, the <strong>Church</strong> historian, Carl<br />
Hase, expresses his opinion concerning these events in these word:<br />
“The energy, the capacity for suffering, the joy in believing, which<br />
characterized the Christians of the first centuries of the church reappeared in<br />
the Ana-baptists.’ Indeed, one can not but be astonished at the steadfastness of<br />
these men, who so joyfully went to death, and disdained to purchase life by a<br />
word of recantation. Only once, at the time of Roman persecution of the<br />
Christians, does the entire history of the Christian church furnish an example<br />
of such slaughter. … Not to speak of the Netherlands, where at the beginning<br />
of 1530, according to the words of a contemporary, there was hardly a village<br />
or a city in which the danger of revolution on the part of the <strong>Baptist</strong>s did not<br />
seem to be imminent. Let us now turn our attention to the German provinces.<br />
… The more I examine the documents of that time, at my command, the more<br />
I am astonished at the extent of the diffusion of Anabaptist views, an extent of<br />
which no other investigator has any knowledge. In all the cities in the<br />
archbishopric, with scarcely one or two exceptions, there were Anabaptists,<br />
and even in the country towns and villages. The same was true of the<br />
neighboring districts. … Many <strong>Baptist</strong> churches cannot be enumerated for the<br />
reason that their existence was a profound secret. … For the details I refer to<br />
original documents cited by me in another place, and will here only refer to<br />
the fact, that in the evangelical cities, Bremen, Hamburg, Lubec, Wisemar,<br />
Rostock, Stralsund, Brunswick, Hanover, Lunebury, etc., it can be proved that<br />
there were either fully established churches, or, at least, individual <strong>Baptist</strong>s<br />
(and that, too, many among the clergy). It is not to be doubted, also, that in<br />
the progress of scientific invention still farther traces will be brought to light.<br />
… Much rather can it be proved that in the lands mentioned <strong>Baptist</strong> churches<br />
existed for many decades and EVEN CENTURIES.” f707<br />
Dr. A.H. Newman, a high authority on this subject, says:<br />
“It may be permitted to the writer to say that he is in thorough sympathy with<br />
Keller’s general view of the old evangelical party and of the Reformation of<br />
the sixteenth century. f708 The reader will please especially not over-look the<br />
latter part of Keller’s statement, in my last quotation from him, that instead of<br />
saying that like other non-Catholic sects, <strong>Baptist</strong>s are the children of the<br />
Reformation, he says and has given ample proof of the statement, of their<br />
great prevalence when the Reformation began: ‘<strong>Baptist</strong> churches existed for<br />
many decades and even centuries’ before the Reformation.”<br />
Dr. E.T. Winkler says: