Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
“Dr. Sears’ inference from their alleged failure to magnify the significance of immersion, and from their apparent agreement with the reformers as to the mode, falls to the ground when we learn from an authority like Hofing, that at that time immersion was as common as sprinkling, that the Roman ritual, Luther’s books on baptism, and almost all the Lutheran rituals instruct the administrator to immerse the candidate and that the word sprinkle is hardly ever to be found in the earlier regulations. It is well known that the church of England put immersion first, and allowed sprinkling only in case of the feeble. Logically, therefore, it might be admitted that the Anabaptists did not differ from the prevalent mode of baptism and still the presumption would be that they immersed. … Gastins was wont to say, with ghastly sarcasm, as he ordered the Anabaptists to be drowned: ‘They like immersion so much let us immerse them,’ and his words became a proverb. Zwingli used to call them ‘bath fellows.’ Hubmeyer destroyed the font as well as the altar at Waldshut, denouncing them both as nests of evil. … He says, ‘the soul must be sprinkled with the blood of Christ and the body be washed through pure water.’ The subjoined tract of this scholar and martyr is unmistakable on this point. Bullinger admits all the spiritual significance of immersion, in his controversy with the Anabaptists. Finally, the English Baptists practiced immersion and the first of them came from the continent.” From a form for baptizing in water, Niclolsburg, 1527, Dr. Everts, quotes: “Do you upon this faith and duty desire to be baptized in water.” Says Dr. J.A. Smith, formerly Lecturer on Church History to the Baptist Theological Seminary, in Chicago: “Whether Menno Simon was or was not strictly a Baptist, has been lately called in question. Pertinent to the matter is a quotation from his writings, Mennonis Simons Opera, p. 24, by a writer in the Nonconformist and Independent. At the place noted, Simon Menno says: ‘After we have searched ever so diligently, we shall find no other baptism besides dipping that is acceptable to God and maintained in his word.’ We can from PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE testify to the accuracy of this quotation.” The writer goes on to say: “It is true that the followers in Holland departed from the practice.” f473 Of Menno’s words — Doopsel in den water — Dr. Howard Osgood says: “The words, indoopenege, onderdoopinege, onderdompelinge, are employed in Dutch to express immersion. … Doop and doopen in Dutch exactly correspond to taufe and taufen in German. All these words come from the same root and etymologically signify dipping and dip.” Dr. Osgood gives the following proofs that the Anabaptists immersed: “Zwingli was all powerful in the council at Zurich and the council passed the following decree, ‘Qui interum mergat, mergatur.’ Under the decree in 1527, the first Anabaptist martyr in Switzerland, Felix Mantz, one of the first
scholars in his day, was drowned in the lake of Zurich, near Zwingli’s church. … Within the canton of Zurich the usual punishment was drowning, as will be seen by instances related in the martyrology, published by the Hanserd- Knollys Society. John Stumpf, a con-temporary of Zwingli in his history of Switzerland, p. 2444, says: ‘What was worst of all, they, the Ana-baptists, repeated the baptism … and were rebaptized in the rivers and streams.’ “Again, Kessler, in his Sabbata, vol. 1, p. 266, says that ‘Wolfang Uliman, of St. Gall, went to Schaffhausen and met Conrad Grebel,’ the most prominent leader, preacher and scholar among the Anabaptists, ‘who instructed him in the knowledge of Anabaptism that he would not be sprinkled out of a dish, but was drawn under and covered over with the water of the Rhine by Conrad Grebel.’ On p. 268, Kessler adds that Grebel came to St. Gall, Kessler’s home, where his preaching was attended by hundreds from the town and surrounding country and the longing desire many had nourished for a year, was accomplished by following Grebel to the Sitter river and being baptized by him there. When I was at St. Gall, in 1867, I made special investigation upon this point. A mountain stream, sufficient for all sprinkling purposes, flows through the city, but in no place is it deep enough for the immersion of a person, while the Sitter river is between two and three miles away, and is gained by a different road. The only solution of this choice was that Grebel sought the river in order to immerse the candidates. August Naef, secretary of the council at St. Gall, in a work published in 1850, on p. 1021, speaking of the practices of Anabaptists, in 1525, says: “They baptized those who believed with them in rivers and lakes, and in a great wooden cask and the butchers’ square before a great crowd.’ “These immersions were in Switzerland from 1524-30. An old historian of Augsburg, Sender, says: The hated sect in 1527 met in the gardens of houses, men and women, rich and poor, more than 1100 in all, who were rebaptized. They put on peculiar clothes in which to be baptized, for in the houses where their bapisteries were, there were a number of garments always prepared.’ “A later historian of Augsburg, Wagenseil, says: ‘In 1527 the Anabaptists baptized none who did not believe with them; and the candidates were not merely sprinkled with water but were wholly submerged.’ These are the testimonies of Pedobaptists. “Zwingli entitles his great work against the Anabaptists, ‘Elenchus contra Catabaptistas.’ Catabaptistas, a word of post-classical Greek, according to Passow and Liddell and Scott, means ‘one who dips or drowns,’ and that Zwingli uses the word in this signification, is shown by his repeated endeavor in this work to make all sorts of fun of the baptism of the Anabaptists, immersion, ‘dying people,’ ‘redying them,’ ‘plunging them into the darkness of water to unite them to a church of darkness,’ ‘they mersed,’ etc. “The following I find from the Anabaptists on the mode of baptism. … Belthazar Hubmeyer, in his treatise on baptism, ‘von dem Christenlichen
- Page 95 and 96: “They rejected baptism and in a m
- Page 97 and 98: “Nothing is said by Hoveden of th
- Page 99 and 100: “I see no reason to doubt that we
- Page 101 and 102: Kurtz: “The little town of Albi i
- Page 103 and 104: on nothing without the consent of t
- Page 105 and 106: which were essentially Baptistic, w
- Page 107 and 108: the Catharists. Let him travel in I
- Page 109 and 110: Verona; Lorenzo or Lawrence at Serm
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 14. — THE PETROBRUSSIANS
- Page 113 and 114: orders, and, indeed, grounds all hi
- Page 115 and 116: would not adore images, offer praye
- Page 117 and 118: Says Mosheim: CHAPTER 15. — THE A
- Page 119 and 120: Baird: ecclesiastical affair’s. T
- Page 121 and 122: political f325 heresy was the sourc
- Page 123 and 124: CHAPTER 16. — THE WALDENSES. Of t
- Page 125 and 126: from their rejecting infant baptism
- Page 127 and 128: (6.) From the foregoing they agreed
- Page 129 and 130: “In this liturgy there is no offi
- Page 131 and 132: “As to baptism they said that was
- Page 133 and 134: “formerly no person was brought t
- Page 135 and 136: Says Robert Baird: “There is noth
- Page 137 and 138: CHAPTER 17. — THE ANABAPTISTS. In
- Page 139 and 140: pedobaptism.’ … ‘The visible
- Page 141 and 142: In an article in the Standard, Prof
- Page 143 and 144: “Baptism should be given to all t
- Page 145: Luther and the other reformers as t
- Page 149 and 150: sin, buried with Christ, he rises t
- Page 151 and 152: on a converted membership they agre
- Page 153 and 154: ecause of the effrontery with which
- Page 155 and 156: Dr. Wall also says: “France seems
- Page 157 and 158: CHAPTER 18. — THE ANABAPTISTS AND
- Page 159 and 160: with Munzer in reference to baptism
- Page 161 and 162: once deeply imbibed, blinds the eye
- Page 163 and 164: put to a bloody slaughter for their
- Page 165 and 166: destructive fanaticism with which a
- Page 167 and 168: “The plebeian sect of the Anabapt
- Page 169 and 170: Moller: “Condemned in Rome, Monta
- Page 171 and 172: “They had not become extinct when
- Page 173 and 174: Novatians and the Donatists, which
- Page 175 and 176: CHAPTER 20. — THE BAPTIST CHURCH
- Page 177 and 178: “Haeriticus est omnis non orthodo
- Page 179 and 180: “The Bogomiles were a branch of t
- Page 181 and 182: teachings of Peter de Bruys, and it
- Page 183 and 184: CHAPTER 21. — THE WALDENSES OF AP
- Page 185 and 186: Sylvester, 314 to 335 A.D. and acco
- Page 187 and 188: accept the testimony of the ‘Cath
- Page 189 and 190: efore Waldo, let them prove it,”
- Page 191 and 192: certain professors of church histor
- Page 193 and 194: history, with a genuine Waldensian
- Page 195 and 196: events as to deny that traditional
“Dr. Sears’ inference from their alleged failure to magnify the significance of<br />
immersion, and from their apparent agreement with the reformers as to the<br />
mode, falls to the ground when we learn from an authority like Hofing, that at<br />
that time immersion was as common as sprinkling, that the Roman ritual,<br />
Luther’s books on baptism, and almost all the Lutheran rituals instruct the<br />
administrator to immerse the candidate and that the word sprinkle is hardly<br />
ever to be found in the earlier regulations. It is well known that the church of<br />
England put immersion first, and allowed sprinkling only in case of the<br />
feeble. Logically, therefore, it might be admitted that the Anabaptists did not<br />
differ from the prevalent mode of baptism and still the presumption would be<br />
that they immersed. … Gastins was wont to say, with ghastly sarcasm, as he<br />
ordered the Anabaptists to be drowned: ‘They like immersion so much let us<br />
immerse them,’ and his words became a proverb. Zwingli used to call them<br />
‘bath fellows.’ Hubmeyer destroyed the font as well as the altar at Waldshut,<br />
denouncing them both as nests of evil. … He says, ‘the soul must be sprinkled<br />
with the blood of Christ and the body be washed through pure water.’ The<br />
subjoined tract of this scholar and martyr is unmistakable on this point.<br />
Bullinger admits all the spiritual significance of immersion, in his controversy<br />
with the Anabaptists. Finally, the English <strong>Baptist</strong>s practiced immersion and<br />
the first of them came from the continent.” From a form for baptizing in<br />
water, Niclolsburg, 1527, Dr. Everts, quotes: “Do you upon this faith and duty<br />
desire to be baptized in water.”<br />
Says Dr. J.A. Smith, formerly Lecturer on <strong>Church</strong> History to the <strong>Baptist</strong><br />
Theological Seminary, in Chicago:<br />
“Whether Menno Simon was or was not strictly a <strong>Baptist</strong>, has been lately<br />
called in question. Pertinent to the matter is a quotation from his writings,<br />
Mennonis Simons Opera, p. 24, by a writer in the Nonconformist and<br />
Independent. At the place noted, Simon Menno says: ‘After we have searched<br />
ever so diligently, we shall find no other baptism besides dipping that is<br />
acceptable to God and maintained in his word.’ We can from PERSONAL<br />
KNOWLEDGE testify to the accuracy of this quotation.”<br />
The writer goes on to say: “It is true that the followers in Holland departed<br />
from the practice.” f473<br />
Of Menno’s words — Doopsel in den water — Dr. Howard Osgood says:<br />
“The words, indoopenege, onderdoopinege, onderdompelinge, are employed<br />
in Dutch to express immersion. … Doop and doopen in Dutch exactly<br />
correspond to taufe and taufen in German. All these words come from the<br />
same root and etymologically signify dipping and dip.”<br />
Dr. Osgood gives the following proofs that the Anabaptists immersed:<br />
“Zwingli was all powerful in the council at Zurich and the council passed the<br />
following decree, ‘Qui interum mergat, mergatur.’ Under the decree in 1527,<br />
the first Anabaptist martyr in Switzerland, Felix Mantz, one of the first