09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Says Robert Baird:<br />

“There is nothing in the organization or action of these churches that in the<br />

slightest degree savors of prelacy. And, in answer to our inquiries on this<br />

subject, the pastors have, without exception, stated that prelacy has never<br />

existed in these valleys; and that such has ever been the uniform opinion of<br />

their ancestors, so far as it has been handed down to them. As to their bishops,<br />

spoken of in some of their early writings, they believe that they were nothing<br />

more than pastors. They say what is undeniable, that their histories speak<br />

continually of their barbes, as being their religious teachers and guides, but<br />

that the word bishop is hardly over met with.” f425<br />

Reinerius says of the sect in general: “They say the bishops, clergy and other<br />

religious orders are no better than the scribes and Pharisees.” f426 As Armitage<br />

remarks:<br />

“This relates to character, however, but they did not despise a true Christian<br />

ministry, for the same writer, who was a resident of Lombardy, says there<br />

they had ‘elders.’ Yet, there is nothing to show that they had any order of<br />

ministers amongst them as a universal thing; or even regularly located pastors,<br />

as we should deem them. They had barbes, or preachers, but on the principle<br />

of the seventy disciples which Jesus sent forth two by two. These were not<br />

divided into orders, but into three moral classes, from which the mistake has<br />

arisen concerning an episcopal form of church government.” f427<br />

Of them Preger, than whom there is no higher authority, says that all:<br />

“ecclesiastical authority was vested in the congregation., so that there was no<br />

room for bishops.” f428 “Reinerius represents them as holding that all men in<br />

Christ’s church stand on an exact parity.” f427<br />

Armitage says:<br />

“In this fraternity of preachers, in the absence of orders, distinction was made<br />

between them as major and minor. This arose from the custom of sending<br />

them out in twos, a young man and an elder, that the younger might learn<br />

from the elder.” f429<br />

This may explain Mosheim’s statement, that “The government of the church<br />

was committed by the Waldenses to bishops, presbyters and deacons,” while a<br />

foot note says, “the bishops were also called majoralies or elders.” f430<br />

Prof. Whitsitt, of the Southern <strong>Baptist</strong> Theological Seminary, says: “At first<br />

there was no distinction between clergy and laity.” That is, as we have seen, no<br />

kind of prelatical distinction was between their ministers and members. f431<br />

They had (as are the general secretaries or superintendents of missions. among<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong>s of to-day) general superintendents. But, as Dr. A.H. Newman<br />

observes: “The early Waldenses. … refused to employ the word bishop to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!