09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

from their rejecting infant baptism. (See proof farther on of their rejecting<br />

infant baptism.)<br />

(2.) The Waldenses were <strong>Baptist</strong>s in that they practiced only immersion. To all<br />

who are familiar with church history it is well known there was no affusion till<br />

the middle of the third century, and that from that time to the Reformation<br />

immersion was the rule and affusion allowed only in cases of sickness —<br />

called: “clinic baptism.” Thus the Prayer Book of 1549 says: “If the child be<br />

weak it shall suffice to pour upon it.” While: “clinic baptism” was practiced by<br />

the Romish church it was never sanctioned by any council until sanctioned by<br />

the council of Ravenna, A.D. 1311. We have seen that that the Waldenses<br />

affiliated with the Hussies; and Erasmus wrote of them:<br />

“The Hussites renounced all rites and ceremonies of the Catholic church; they<br />

ridicule our doctrine and practices in both the sacraments; they deny orders<br />

(the hierarchy) and elect officers from among the laity; they receive no other<br />

rule than the Bible; they admit none into their communion until they are<br />

dipped in water, or baptized; and they reckon one another without distinction<br />

or rank to be called brothers and sisters.” f349<br />

Living in an age in which immersion was the universal law and the custom,<br />

and in which affusion was only allowed for sick infants, and in, possibly, a<br />

very few cases for sick adults, and then to save from hell, and practicing only<br />

believer’s baptism, rejecting, as we will see, water salvation, that the<br />

Waldenses were <strong>Baptist</strong>s as to the action of baptism is the inevitable<br />

conclusion. Hence, Armitage says: “They believed and practiced immersion<br />

only.” f350 Mezeray says: “In the twelfth century they (Waldenses) plunged the<br />

candidate in the sacred font.” f351<br />

(3.) The Waldenses were <strong>Baptist</strong>s as to the design of baptism. In their<br />

Confession of A.D. 1120, just quoted, the Waldenses say:<br />

“We consider the sacraments as signs of holy things, or as the visible emblems<br />

of invisible blessings. We regard it as proper and ever necessary that believers<br />

use these symbols or visible forms when it can be done. Notwithstanding, we<br />

maintain that believers may be saved without these signs, when they have<br />

neither place nor opportunity of observing them.” f352<br />

In their Confession of 1544, they say:<br />

“We believe that in the ordinance of baptism the water is the visible and<br />

external sign, which represents to us that which by virtue of God’s invisible<br />

operations is within us, namely, the renovation of our minds and the<br />

mortification of our members through the faith of Jesus Christ. And by this<br />

ordinance we are received into the congregation of God’s people, previously<br />

professing and declaring our faith and change of life.” f353

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!