Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Though the charge that the Albigenses rejected marriage, baptism and the supper, has been refuted in page 119, refuting the same charge against them under the name Paulicians, the reader will notice that these charges are, incidentally, farther refuted in the following. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of them: “The statement that they rejected marriage, often made by Roman Catholics, has probably no other foundation in fact than that they denied marriage as a sacrament; and many other statements of their doctrines must be received at least with suspicion, as coming from prejudiced and implacable opponents.” f265 Alanus, speaking of the Albigenses, says: “They rejected infant baptism. … It does not appear that they rejected either of the sacraments.” f266 Collier says: “They refused to own infant baptism.” f266 Brockett says: “Nothing is said by Hoveden of their rejection of the sacraments of baptism and the eucharist, which would certainly have been mentioned by so careful a writer as Hoveden, had it existed. Indeed, his strongest objection to them was their refusal to take an oath.” f266 Favin, a historian, is quoted as saying: “The Albigenses do esteem the baptizing of infants superstitious.” Izam, the Troubadour, a Dominican persecutor of these heretics, says: “They admitted another baptism.” f267 Chassanion is quoted as saying: “I cannot deny that the Albigenses, for the greater part, were opposed to infant baptism; the truth is, they did not reject the sacraments as useless, but only as unnecessary to infants.” They had no Campbellism in them. As Armitage observes: “They rejected the Romish church and esteemed the New Testament above all its traditions and ceremonies. They did not take oaths, nor believe in baptismal regeneration; but they were ascetic and pure in their lives; they also exalted celibacy.” f268 Their encouraging celibacy, as they believed in marriage, was probably for the reason that Paul encouraged it temporarily, be-cause of persecution being harder to endure in families than when single. f269 As refusing to take oaths was a practice of many of these ancient Baptists, I here stop to say: While that matter with Baptists is a matter of little importance, yet I believe they were, probably, nearer right than we are; for, while by “swear not at all” our Savior alluded to only profanity, yet, as Archbishop Whately observes, I believe that men who will tell a lie will swear one as readily, once the penalty is out of the way; hence, instead of taking oath annex the penalty of swearing a lie to telling it in court. In church government the Albigenses were Baptists. A historian says: “Their bards or pastors were every one of them heads of their churches, but they acted
on nothing without the consent of the people and the clergy,” i.e., the ministers who had charge of no church. “Deacons expounded the gospels, distributed the Lord’s supper, baptized, and sometimes had the oversight of churches, visited the sick and took care of the temporalities of the church.” Chr. Schmidt says: “Their ritual and ecclesiastical organization were exceedingly simple.” f270 This was so much the case that the Romish church, not seeing any church in so simple an organization, thought they had no churches, and Prof. Schmidt has, thereby, been mislead into the same conclusion. In Chap. XI — noticing them as Paulicians — they are clearly proved to have been, in church government, Baptist. The Albigenses were pure in their lives and a zealous people in good works. Carl Schmidt says of them: “Their severe moral demands made impression because the example of their preachers corresponded with their words. … In a short time the Albigenses had congregations with schools and charitable institutions of their own. … The Roman Catholic church, so far as it still could be said to exist in the country, had become an object of contempt and derision. This state of affairs, of course, caused great alarm in Rome.” f271 Thus, “the Albigensian heresy,” as Lord Macaulay observes, brought about the civilization, the literature, the national existence … of the most opulent and enlightened part of the great European family.” f272
- Page 51 and 52: apostolic churches. Reader and auth
- Page 53 and 54: “Many of the Welsh writings, whic
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER 6. — THE NEGATIVE PROOF.
- Page 57 and 58: Professor John Clarke Ridpath, Meth
- Page 59 and 60: Waldenses, and through them a line
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER 7. — IN THE PERPETUITY OF
- Page 63 and 64: Baptist churches? “Baptist princi
- Page 65 and 66: Against “Gnostocism, Montanism wa
- Page 67 and 68: Spirit were to be dispensed to Chri
- Page 69 and 70: That the Montanist churches were Ba
- Page 71 and 72: he had not been elected bishop; tha
- Page 73 and 74: The Novatian church government was
- Page 75 and 76: community of saints could not fail
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 10. — THE DONATISTS. “T
- Page 79 and 80: Munster, it would not, as in their
- Page 81 and 82: Any one who is familiar with the pr
- Page 83 and 84: “We clearly trace among them the
- Page 85 and 86: As the result of the emperor’s de
- Page 87 and 88: Child, an infidel, says: “The mem
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 11. — THE PAULICIANS. The
- Page 91 and 92: avings of their inspired leader, th
- Page 93 and 94: “They received all the books of t
- Page 95 and 96: “They rejected baptism and in a m
- Page 97 and 98: “Nothing is said by Hoveden of th
- Page 99 and 100: “I see no reason to doubt that we
- Page 101: Kurtz: “The little town of Albi i
- Page 105 and 106: which were essentially Baptistic, w
- Page 107 and 108: the Catharists. Let him travel in I
- Page 109 and 110: Verona; Lorenzo or Lawrence at Serm
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 14. — THE PETROBRUSSIANS
- Page 113 and 114: orders, and, indeed, grounds all hi
- Page 115 and 116: would not adore images, offer praye
- Page 117 and 118: Says Mosheim: CHAPTER 15. — THE A
- Page 119 and 120: Baird: ecclesiastical affair’s. T
- Page 121 and 122: political f325 heresy was the sourc
- Page 123 and 124: CHAPTER 16. — THE WALDENSES. Of t
- Page 125 and 126: from their rejecting infant baptism
- Page 127 and 128: (6.) From the foregoing they agreed
- Page 129 and 130: “In this liturgy there is no offi
- Page 131 and 132: “As to baptism they said that was
- Page 133 and 134: “formerly no person was brought t
- Page 135 and 136: Says Robert Baird: “There is noth
- Page 137 and 138: CHAPTER 17. — THE ANABAPTISTS. In
- Page 139 and 140: pedobaptism.’ … ‘The visible
- Page 141 and 142: In an article in the Standard, Prof
- Page 143 and 144: “Baptism should be given to all t
- Page 145 and 146: Luther and the other reformers as t
- Page 147 and 148: scholars in his day, was drowned in
- Page 149 and 150: sin, buried with Christ, he rises t
- Page 151 and 152: on a converted membership they agre
Though the charge that the Albigenses rejected marriage, baptism and the<br />
supper, has been refuted in page 119, refuting the same charge against them<br />
under the name Paulicians, the reader will notice that these charges are,<br />
incidentally, farther refuted in the following. The Encyclopedia Britannica says<br />
of them:<br />
“The statement that they rejected marriage, often made by Roman Catholics,<br />
has probably no other foundation in fact than that they denied marriage as a<br />
sacrament; and many other statements of their doctrines must be received at<br />
least with suspicion, as coming from prejudiced and implacable opponents.”<br />
f265<br />
Alanus, speaking of the Albigenses, says: “They rejected infant baptism. … It<br />
does not appear that they rejected either of the sacraments.” f266 Collier says:<br />
“They refused to own infant baptism.” f266 Brockett says: “Nothing is said by<br />
Hoveden of their rejection of the sacraments of baptism and the eucharist,<br />
which would certainly have been mentioned by so careful a writer as<br />
Hoveden, had it existed. Indeed, his strongest objection to them was their<br />
refusal to take an oath.” f266<br />
Favin, a historian, is quoted as saying: “The Albigenses do esteem the<br />
baptizing of infants superstitious.” Izam, the Troubadour, a Dominican<br />
persecutor of these heretics, says: “They admitted another baptism.” f267<br />
Chassanion is quoted as saying:<br />
“I cannot deny that the Albigenses, for the greater part, were opposed to<br />
infant baptism; the truth is, they did not reject the sacraments as useless, but<br />
only as unnecessary to infants.”<br />
They had no Campbellism in them. As Armitage observes: “They rejected the<br />
Romish church and esteemed the New Testament above all its traditions and<br />
ceremonies. They did not take oaths, nor believe in baptismal regeneration; but<br />
they were ascetic and pure in their lives; they also exalted celibacy.” f268 Their<br />
encouraging celibacy, as they believed in marriage, was probably for the<br />
reason that Paul encouraged it temporarily, be-cause of persecution being<br />
harder to endure in families than when single. f269<br />
As refusing to take oaths was a practice of many of these ancient <strong>Baptist</strong>s, I<br />
here stop to say: While that matter with <strong>Baptist</strong>s is a matter of little<br />
importance, yet I believe they were, probably, nearer right than we are; for,<br />
while by “swear not at all” our Savior alluded to only profanity, yet, as<br />
Archbishop Whately observes, I believe that men who will tell a lie will swear<br />
one as readily, once the penalty is out of the way; hence, instead of taking oath<br />
annex the penalty of swearing a lie to telling it in court.<br />
In church government the Albigenses were <strong>Baptist</strong>s. A historian says: “Their<br />
bards or pastors were every one of them heads of their churches, but they acted