Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§12.6 The Kingdom of God ogy? Here again the issue is nicely posed by Wright's treatment. He commits himself to Schweitzer's agenda of setting Jesus within the context of Jewish eschatology, but it is an eschatology whose apocalyptic features are simply cosmic sound effects. 452 This means that Wright is able to interpret the future elements of Jesus' expectation solely in terms of Jesus' own journey to Jerusalem and Jerusalem's destruction in 70 CE. That Jesus could have looked for anything more than that — judgment of the nations, resurrection to angelic existence, the heaven and hell of traditional Christian envisaging — Wright does not say. The more common way forward has been the synthesis between the thesis of Schweitzer's 'thoroughgoing eschatology' and the antithesis of Dodd's 'realized eschatology' provided by Jeremias's inaugurated eschatology or 'eschatology that is in process of realization' , 453 Imagery such as a train drawing into a station, day beginning to dawn, the final stage of World War II begun with D-day and climaxing in V-day (appreciated by an earlier generation), has all been employed to illustrate the tension in Jesus' usage. My own pennyworth to the debate has been to note the parallel between early Christian eschatology and Jesus' own eschatology provided by reference to the Spirit in each. 454 In Paul's perspective certainly, the Spirit experienced by the early believers was to be understood as the 'first instalment' of the kingdom whose full inheritance was yet outstanding. 455 Jesus' own experience of anointing and ministry empowered by the same Spirit/power of God may in itself have convinced him that God's longed-for (final) manifestation of his royal rule was already in evidence 456 and that its full manifestation could therefore not be long delayed. The point is that such treatments have found it impossible to deny that Jesus had expressed expectation for the imminent happening of events which did «of happen. Jesus' kingdom preaching cannot be disentangled from imminent expectation, with or without 'apocalyptic' features. Which also means that Jesus had entertained hopes which were not fulfilled. There were 'final' elements in his expectation which were not realized. Putting it bluntly, Jesus was proved wrong by the course of events. The discomfort of the conclusion for scholars who were also believers was softened by the thought both that it made more 'real' the humanness of Jesus and that such a conclusion demonstrated their own dispassionate method and scrupulous honesty: this was not the 'historical Jesus' they would have wished to find! 452. Jesus 80-82, 96-97, 207-209. Wright is indebted to Caird, Language ch. 14. 453. Jeremias, Parables 230 ('sich realisierende Eschatologie'). 454. J. D. G. Dunn, 'Spirit and Kingdom', ExpT 82 (1970-71) 36-40, reprinted in The Christ and the Spirit vol. 2: Pneumatology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998) 133-41. 455. 2 Cor. 1.22; 5.5; similarly Rom. 8.23; cf. also Rom. 8.14-17; 1 Cor. 6.9-11; 15.44- 50; Gal. 4.6-7, 29-30; Eph. 1.14. See further my Theology of Paul 421, 424, 469-70. 456. Cf. Borg, Jesus 198-99. 479

§12.6 The K<strong>in</strong>gdom of God<br />

ogy? Here aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> issue is nicely posed by Wright's treatment. He commits<br />

himself to Schweitzer's agenda of sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Jesus</strong> with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of Jewish eschatology,<br />

but it is an eschatology whose apocalyptic features are simply cosmic<br />

sound effects. 452 This means that Wright is able to <strong>in</strong>terpret <strong>the</strong> future elements<br />

of <strong>Jesus</strong>' expectation solely <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>Jesus</strong>' own journey to Jerusalem and Jerusalem's<br />

destruction <strong>in</strong> 70 CE. That <strong>Jesus</strong> could have looked for anyth<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

than that — judgment of <strong>the</strong> nations, resurrection to angelic existence, <strong>the</strong><br />

heaven and hell of traditional Christian envisag<strong>in</strong>g — Wright does not say.<br />

The more common way forward has been <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis between <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis<br />

of Schweitzer's 'thoroughgo<strong>in</strong>g eschatology' and <strong>the</strong> anti<strong>the</strong>sis of Dodd's 'realized<br />

eschatology' provided by Jeremias's <strong>in</strong>augurated eschatology or 'eschatology<br />

that is <strong>in</strong> process of realization' , 453 Imagery such as a tra<strong>in</strong> draw<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

station, day beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to dawn, <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al stage of World War II begun with D-day<br />

and climax<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> V-day (appreciated by an earlier generation), has all been employed<br />

to illustrate <strong>the</strong> tension <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' usage. My own pennyworth to <strong>the</strong> debate<br />

has been to note <strong>the</strong> parallel between early Christian eschatology and <strong>Jesus</strong>' own<br />

eschatology provided by reference to <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>in</strong> each. 454 In Paul's perspective<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly, <strong>the</strong> Spirit experienced by <strong>the</strong> early believers was to be understood as<br />

<strong>the</strong> 'first <strong>in</strong>stalment' of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom whose full <strong>in</strong>heritance was yet outstand<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

455 <strong>Jesus</strong>' own experience of ano<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and m<strong>in</strong>istry empowered by <strong>the</strong> same<br />

Spirit/power of God may <strong>in</strong> itself have conv<strong>in</strong>ced him that God's longed-for (f<strong>in</strong>al)<br />

manifestation of his royal rule was already <strong>in</strong> evidence 456 and that its full<br />

manifestation could <strong>the</strong>refore not be long delayed.<br />

The po<strong>in</strong>t is that such treatments have found it impossible to deny that <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

had expressed expectation for <strong>the</strong> imm<strong>in</strong>ent happen<strong>in</strong>g of events which did<br />

«of happen. <strong>Jesus</strong>' k<strong>in</strong>gdom preach<strong>in</strong>g cannot be disentangled from imm<strong>in</strong>ent expectation,<br />

with or without 'apocalyptic' features. Which also means that <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

had enterta<strong>in</strong>ed hopes which were not fulfilled. There were 'f<strong>in</strong>al' elements <strong>in</strong> his<br />

expectation which were not realized. Putt<strong>in</strong>g it bluntly, <strong>Jesus</strong> was proved wrong<br />

by <strong>the</strong> course of events. The discomfort of <strong>the</strong> conclusion for scholars who were<br />

also believers was softened by <strong>the</strong> thought both that it made more 'real' <strong>the</strong> humanness<br />

of <strong>Jesus</strong> and that such a conclusion demonstrated <strong>the</strong>ir own dispassionate<br />

method and scrupulous honesty: this was not <strong>the</strong> 'historical <strong>Jesus</strong>' <strong>the</strong>y would<br />

have wished to f<strong>in</strong>d!<br />

452. <strong>Jesus</strong> 80-82, 96-97, 207-209. Wright is <strong>in</strong>debted to Caird, Language ch. 14.<br />

453. Jeremias, Parables 230 ('sich realisierende Eschatologie').<br />

454. J. D. G. Dunn, 'Spirit and K<strong>in</strong>gdom', ExpT 82 (1970-71) 36-40, repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> The<br />

Christ and <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>vol</strong>. 2: Pneumatology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998) 133-41.<br />

455. 2 Cor. 1.22; 5.5; similarly Rom. 8.23; cf. also Rom. 8.14-17; 1 Cor. 6.9-11; 15.44-<br />

50; Gal. 4.6-7, 29-30; Eph. 1.14. See fur<strong>the</strong>r my Theology of Paul 421, 424, 469-70.<br />

456. Cf. Borg, <strong>Jesus</strong> 198-99.<br />

479

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!