09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§12.5 The K<strong>in</strong>gdom of God<br />

<strong>the</strong> celebration that was consequently appropriate. Only one of <strong>the</strong> four say<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Q sequence expresses <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t explicitly <strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom terms, as does also<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent say<strong>in</strong>g (4). But it would hardly distort <strong>the</strong> evidence to sum up<br />

<strong>the</strong> emphasis <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom be<strong>in</strong>g already active <strong>in</strong> and through <strong>Jesus</strong>'<br />

mission, <strong>in</strong> contrast to that of <strong>the</strong> Baptist.<br />

Of particular importance <strong>the</strong>ologically is <strong>the</strong> immediate corollary regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> two eschatological views. The Baptist saw <strong>the</strong><br />

present only as opportunity to flee from <strong>the</strong> wrath to come. <strong>Jesus</strong> saw <strong>the</strong> present<br />

as already manifest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> graciousness of God. He did not denounce or<br />

abandon John's expectation of judgment. But it was judgment preempted by<br />

grace. 349 This aspect of <strong>Jesus</strong>' mission will reemerge repeatedly <strong>in</strong> chapters 13<br />

and 14 below.<br />

In confirmation of what was deduced <strong>in</strong> § 11.2b, <strong>the</strong>n, it would appear that<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g on and convictions regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom were <strong>the</strong> crucial factor<br />

<strong>in</strong> his strik<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>in</strong>dependently of and with different emphasis from John.<br />

John's expectations had been too one-sided; <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r dimension(s) of what <strong>the</strong><br />

prophets had looked for could be experienced now already. That conviction and<br />

consequent emphases and practice marked some sort of part<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> ways between<br />

John and <strong>Jesus</strong>. The differ<strong>in</strong>g emphases of <strong>the</strong> traditions exam<strong>in</strong>ed mean<br />

that we cannot conceptualise <strong>the</strong> relation between <strong>the</strong>m as a neat divid<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

'before' and 'after' some clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed eschatological turn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. And, so far<br />

as we can tell, <strong>the</strong>re was never any question among <strong>Jesus</strong>' first followers of simply<br />

dismiss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Baptist or his message. 350 But <strong>the</strong> change of emphasis was<br />

never<strong>the</strong>less perceived by <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> earliest Christian memory as a change like <strong>the</strong><br />

dawn<strong>in</strong>g of a new day follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> darkest hour before dawn.<br />

d. <strong>Jesus</strong>' Claims regard<strong>in</strong>g His Exorcisms<br />

Without doubt <strong>Jesus</strong> was known as a successful exorcist. This is a claim which is<br />

easily substantiated, as we shall see later (§15.7b, c). Here we need to take account<br />

of <strong>the</strong> tradition that <strong>Jesus</strong> spoke about that success and about its significance.<br />

And here aga<strong>in</strong> we f<strong>in</strong>d a collection, if not two collections, of <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on <strong>the</strong> subject. As with o<strong>the</strong>r such collections, <strong>the</strong> very fact of <strong>the</strong> collection<br />

349. See particularly Becker, <strong>Jesus</strong> of Nazareth 74-78, referr<strong>in</strong>g to Matt. 20.1-16; Luke<br />

15.11-32; and Luke 18.10-14: 'it is no longer <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al moment of <strong>the</strong> old age before an imm<strong>in</strong>ent<br />

judgment; it is <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> new age of salvation' (79). Similarly Merkel,<br />

'Gottesherrschaft' 151-53; Gnilka, <strong>Jesus</strong> of Nazareth 96-101: <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of '<strong>in</strong>comprehensible,<br />

limitless goodness', '<strong>in</strong>credible goodness', 'boundless goodness' (95, 101, 102).<br />

350. Pace Hollenbach ('Conversion of <strong>Jesus</strong>' 203-17) and Crossan (Historical <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

237-38) who press for a radical transformation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' earlier attitude to John.<br />

455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!