Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE MISSION OF JESUS §12.5 news, and new life. 319 It is just such subtlety in using Scripture which is recalled as characteristic of Jesus' teaching elsewhere. 320 Third, Matt. 11.5/Luke 7.22 is a remarkable confirmation from the sayings tradition that Jesus was well known as a successful healer: healings of blind, lame, and deaf are attributed to him, also restoration to life of people who had died. We will refer back to this mutual confirmation of narrative and sayings traditions later on. 321 Here we should note the insertion of an unexpected item in the Isaiah listings — 'lepers are cleansed'. There is nothing in Isaiah which might have inspired the inclusion of that item. Nor, it should be observed, is there any record of leprosy/skin diseases being healed in the records of the earliest churches. The item can be here only because it was generally believed (by Jesus too!) that he had also cleansed lepers. In short, the most obvious explanation for the emergence of this tradition is that Jesus was remembered as giving just this answer to those who inquired on behalf of the Baptist. The final verse of the unit, 'Blessed is anyone who takes no offence at me' (Matt. 11.6/Luke 7.23), might also fall under the same favourable verdict. 322 For though the formulation no doubt resonated mightily in subsequent reflection on Jesus as a 'cause of offence', the skandalon in view here has nothing to do with the offence of the cross. 323 Moreover, the verb (skandalizö, Aramaic tql) is well attested in the Jesus tradition in a variety of contexts, 324 which together probably indicate Jesus' awareness of the 'scandalous' character of his mission (cf. Matt. 11.19a/Luke. 7.34 above). So it should occasion no surprise if Jesus acknowledged the likelihood of the Baptist taking offence at one of his own circle striking out on his own and with an emphasis which cut across John's (cf. John 3.25-26). 325 (2)/(3) The striking feature of sayings 2 and 3 (Matt. 11.7-1 I/Luke 7.24- 28) is the remarkable combination of strong affirmation of the Baptist's role with 319. As so often, Wright brings the passage under the heading of 'return from exile' (Jesus 428-29) and thus obscures the richness and diversity of the prophetic images drawn upon; see further below, § 12.6b. 320. As recalled, e.g., in the sequence Mark 12.24-27, 28-34, 35-37a pars. Contrast the Jesus Seminar, which assumes that use of Scripture is a clear sign of Christian apologetic (Funk, Five Gospels 177-78), as though Jesus could not have made such allusion to Scripture on his own account, unlike Qumran. 321. See below, §15.7. 322. Cf. Bultmamr. 'What are the signs of the time? He himself! His presence, his deeds, his message!', citing Matt. 11.5 (Theology 1.7). 323. Cf. particularly 1 Cor. 1.23; Gal. 5.11. 324. Mark 9.43, 45, 47/Matt. 5.30, 29/Matt. 18.8-9; Mark 9.42/Matt. 18.6/Luke 17.2; Mark 14.27, 29/Matt. 26.31, 33; Matt. 17.27; 24.10; cf. Mark 6.3/Matt. 13.57; Matt. 15.12; John 6.61. 325. Similarly Meier, Marginal Jew 2.135. 450

THE MISSION OF JESUS §12.5<br />

news, and new life. 319 It is just such subtlety <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g Scripture which is recalled<br />

as characteristic of <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g elsewhere. 320<br />

Third, Matt. 11.5/Luke 7.22 is a remarkable confirmation from <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

tradition that <strong>Jesus</strong> was well known as a successful healer: heal<strong>in</strong>gs of bl<strong>in</strong>d,<br />

lame, and deaf are attributed to him, also restoration to life of people who had<br />

died. We will refer back to this mutual confirmation of narrative and say<strong>in</strong>gs traditions<br />

later on. 321 Here we should note <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sertion of an unexpected item <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Isaiah list<strong>in</strong>gs — 'lepers are cleansed'. There is noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Isaiah which might<br />

have <strong>in</strong>spired <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion of that item. Nor, it should be observed, is <strong>the</strong>re any<br />

record of leprosy/sk<strong>in</strong> diseases be<strong>in</strong>g healed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> records of <strong>the</strong> earliest<br />

churches. The item can be here only because it was generally believed (by <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

too!) that he had also cleansed lepers.<br />

In short, <strong>the</strong> most obvious explanation for <strong>the</strong> emergence of this tradition is<br />

that <strong>Jesus</strong> was remembered as giv<strong>in</strong>g just this answer to those who <strong>in</strong>quired on<br />

behalf of <strong>the</strong> Baptist. The f<strong>in</strong>al verse of <strong>the</strong> unit, 'Blessed is anyone who takes no<br />

offence at me' (Matt. 11.6/Luke 7.23), might also fall under <strong>the</strong> same favourable<br />

verdict. 322 For though <strong>the</strong> formulation no doubt resonated mightily <strong>in</strong> subsequent<br />

reflection on <strong>Jesus</strong> as a 'cause of offence', <strong>the</strong> skandalon <strong>in</strong> view here has noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to do with <strong>the</strong> offence of <strong>the</strong> cross. 323 Moreover, <strong>the</strong> verb (skandalizö, Aramaic<br />

tql) is well attested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition <strong>in</strong> a variety of contexts, 324 which<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r probably <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>Jesus</strong>' awareness of <strong>the</strong> 'scandalous' character of his<br />

mission (cf. Matt. 11.19a/Luke. 7.34 above). So it should occasion no surprise if<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> acknowledged <strong>the</strong> likelihood of <strong>the</strong> Baptist tak<strong>in</strong>g offence at one of his own<br />

circle strik<strong>in</strong>g out on his own and with an emphasis which cut across John's (cf.<br />

John 3.25-26). 325<br />

(2)/(3) The strik<strong>in</strong>g feature of say<strong>in</strong>gs 2 and 3 (Matt. 11.7-1 I/Luke 7.24-<br />

28) is <strong>the</strong> remarkable comb<strong>in</strong>ation of strong affirmation of <strong>the</strong> Baptist's role with<br />

319. As so often, Wright br<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>the</strong> passage under <strong>the</strong> head<strong>in</strong>g of 'return from exile' (<strong>Jesus</strong><br />

428-29) and thus obscures <strong>the</strong> richness and diversity of <strong>the</strong> prophetic images drawn upon;<br />

see fur<strong>the</strong>r below, § 12.6b.<br />

320. As recalled, e.g., <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sequence Mark 12.24-27, 28-34, 35-37a pars. Contrast <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, which assumes that use of Scripture is a clear sign of Christian apologetic<br />

(Funk, Five Gospels 177-78), as though <strong>Jesus</strong> could not have made such allusion to Scripture<br />

on his own account, unlike Qumran.<br />

321. See below, §15.7.<br />

322. Cf. Bultmamr. 'What are <strong>the</strong> signs of <strong>the</strong> time? He himself! His presence, his<br />

deeds, his message!', cit<strong>in</strong>g Matt. 11.5 (Theology 1.7).<br />

323. Cf. particularly 1 Cor. 1.23; Gal. 5.11.<br />

324. Mark 9.43, 45, 47/Matt. 5.30, 29/Matt. 18.8-9; Mark 9.42/Matt. 18.6/Luke 17.2;<br />

Mark 14.27, 29/Matt. 26.31, 33; Matt. 17.27; 24.10; cf. Mark 6.3/Matt. 13.57; Matt. 15.12;<br />

John 6.61.<br />

325. Similarly Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.135.<br />

450

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!