Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

FAITH AND THE HISTORICAL JESUS §4.1 came something intolerable to the Enlightenment scholar. 1 The philosophical basis was provided by Rene Descartes (1596-1650), who formulated the model of analytical (scientific, mathematical) reasoning, in which all accepted ideas and opinions are subjected to systematic doubt unless and until one is convinced by self-evident facts. 2 In essence, the Enlightenment signals the emergence of modern science and modern scientific method, where information about the world is to be discovered, not from the Bible or ecclesiastical or classical authority, but from the world itself, by means of careful observation and repeatable experiment. Biblical scholars and theologians influenced by the Enlightenment followed the same logic. The new science increasingly became the paradigm of knowledge, replacing the old Bible. A concept of 'scientific criticism' began to be propounded whose task was to evaluate the records of the past in the light of modern scientific knowledge, free from what many regarded as the often ignorant and primitive superstitions which had previously clouded the present's perception of the past. 3 A third model for scholarly study of the pastness of Jesus was thus developed, the model of scientific inquiry, of investigation of the past following the paradigm provided by the emerging natural sciences. b. Scientific History As a concept, 'modernity' overlaps with 'Enlightenment'; it indicates the increasingly scientific perspective and secular frame of reference which has dominated intellectual activity in western Europe since the Enlightenment. But as a phase in Western intellectual history 'modernity' has long outlasted the Enlightenment and indeed stretched well into the 1960s. 4 For the 'quest of the historical Jesus' the longest lasting effect of 'modernity' has been the application of the scientific paradigm to history. History itself came to be redefined as a science, which should proceed scientifically by devel- 1. On Galileo's significance see, e.g., I. G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (London: SCM, 1966) 23-34. 2. L. J. Beck, 'Descartes, Rene', EncBr 5.597-602: since the one self-evident fact for he who doubts is that he doubts, and, as doubting, is thinking, the cornerstone of self-evident certainty is given by the famous formula 'Cogito, ergo sum' ('I think, therefore I am'). 3. P. L. Gardiner, 'History, Philosophy of, EncBr 8.962. 4. My colleague David Brown points out that both terms are used in narrow and broader senses. Narrowly the Enlightenment denotes only an eighteenth-century movement and modernism a twentieth. 'But both terms are commonly used in a wider sense, and one might as well say in that sense that their influence very much continues into the present, competing with postmodernism' (private communication, dated September 13, 2001). 26

FAITH AND THE HISTORICAL JESUS §4.1<br />

came someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tolerable to <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment scholar. 1 The philosophical basis<br />

was provided by Rene Descartes (1596-1650), who formulated <strong>the</strong> model of<br />

analytical (scientific, ma<strong>the</strong>matical) reason<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> which all accepted ideas and<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ions are subjected to systematic doubt unless and until one is conv<strong>in</strong>ced by<br />

self-evident facts. 2 In essence, <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment signals <strong>the</strong> emergence of modern<br />

science and modern scientific method, where <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> world is<br />

to be discovered, not from <strong>the</strong> Bible or ecclesiastical or classical authority, but<br />

from <strong>the</strong> world itself, by means of careful observation and repeatable experiment.<br />

Biblical scholars and <strong>the</strong>ologians <strong>in</strong>fluenced by <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment followed<br />

<strong>the</strong> same logic. The new science <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly became <strong>the</strong> paradigm of<br />

knowledge, replac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> old Bible. A concept of 'scientific criticism' began to<br />

be propounded whose task was to evaluate <strong>the</strong> records of <strong>the</strong> past <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> light of<br />

modern scientific knowledge, free from what many regarded as <strong>the</strong> often ignorant<br />

and primitive superstitions which had previously clouded <strong>the</strong> present's perception<br />

of <strong>the</strong> past. 3 A third model for scholarly study of <strong>the</strong> pastness of <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

was thus developed, <strong>the</strong> model of scientific <strong>in</strong>quiry, of <strong>in</strong>vestigation of <strong>the</strong> past<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> paradigm provided by <strong>the</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g natural sciences.<br />

b. Scientific History<br />

As a concept, 'modernity' overlaps with 'Enlightenment'; it <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

scientific perspective and secular frame of reference which has dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

<strong>in</strong>tellectual activity <strong>in</strong> western Europe s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment. But as a<br />

phase <strong>in</strong> Western <strong>in</strong>tellectual history 'modernity' has long outlasted <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment<br />

and <strong>in</strong>deed stretched well <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> 1960s. 4<br />

For <strong>the</strong> 'quest of <strong>the</strong> historical <strong>Jesus</strong>' <strong>the</strong> longest last<strong>in</strong>g effect of 'modernity'<br />

has been <strong>the</strong> application of <strong>the</strong> scientific paradigm to history. History itself<br />

came to be redef<strong>in</strong>ed as a science, which should proceed scientifically by devel-<br />

1. On Galileo's significance see, e.g., I. G. Barbour, Issues <strong>in</strong> Science and Religion<br />

(London: SCM, 1966) 23-34.<br />

2. L. J. Beck, 'Descartes, Rene', EncBr 5.597-602: s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> one self-evident fact for he<br />

who doubts is that he doubts, and, as doubt<strong>in</strong>g, is th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> cornerstone of self-evident certa<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

is given by <strong>the</strong> famous formula 'Cogito, ergo sum' ('I th<strong>in</strong>k, <strong>the</strong>refore I am').<br />

3. P. L. Gard<strong>in</strong>er, 'History, Philosophy of, EncBr 8.962.<br />

4. My colleague David Brown po<strong>in</strong>ts out that both terms are used <strong>in</strong> narrow and broader<br />

senses. Narrowly <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment denotes only an eighteenth-century movement and modernism<br />

a twentieth. 'But both terms are commonly used <strong>in</strong> a wider sense, and one might as well<br />

say <strong>in</strong> that sense that <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fluence very much cont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> present, compet<strong>in</strong>g with postmodernism'<br />

(private communication, dated September 13, 2001).<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!