09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MISSION OF JESUS §12.4<br />

<strong>in</strong> close association with <strong>the</strong> engys passage already reviewed (Mark 13.28-29):<br />

'Truly I tell you, this generation will have by no means passed away before all<br />

<strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs happen' (13.30 pars.). In <strong>the</strong> context of Mark's Gospel '<strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs'<br />

can only refer to <strong>the</strong> days of f<strong>in</strong>al tribulation, cosmic turbulence, <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Son of Man and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> elect (13.19-27), which Mark<br />

seems to relate to <strong>the</strong> (anticipated) fall of Jerusalem (13.14-18). And, as Kümmel<br />

justifiably argues, 'it is beyond dispute he genea haute [this generation] can only<br />

mean <strong>the</strong> contemporaries of <strong>Jesus</strong>'. 259 The implication is aga<strong>in</strong> clear that <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

expected a f<strong>in</strong>al catastrophe with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lifetime of his own generation. And even<br />

if <strong>the</strong> present context of 13.30 (and 13.30 itself) is <strong>the</strong> result of much rework<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of tradition, 260 <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>ess of <strong>the</strong> tradents of <strong>the</strong> Mark 13 traditions to attribute<br />

such a note of imm<strong>in</strong>ent expectation to <strong>Jesus</strong> presumably <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong>ir own and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir community's conviction that <strong>the</strong> note was consistent with <strong>the</strong> longer established<br />

elements of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition.<br />

The third of Kümmel's texts is what we might call Schweitzer's text, <strong>the</strong><br />

text on which <strong>the</strong> latter's reconstruction of <strong>Jesus</strong>' mission largely turned 261 —<br />

Matt. 10.23: 'when <strong>the</strong>y persecute you <strong>in</strong> one town, flee to <strong>the</strong> next; for truly I<br />

tell you, you will not have completed <strong>the</strong> towns of Israel before <strong>the</strong> Son of Man<br />

comes' . 262 The text is <strong>the</strong> most difficult of <strong>the</strong> three: only Mat<strong>the</strong>w has it; he has<br />

attached it to a section drawn from Mark's apocalyptic discourse (Mark 13.9-13/<br />

Matt. 10.17-22) generally regarded as <strong>the</strong> section of <strong>the</strong> 'little apocalypse' which<br />

reflects most clearly <strong>the</strong> circumstances of <strong>the</strong> later (Christian) mission; and <strong>the</strong><br />

expectation of <strong>the</strong> Son of Man's (second) com<strong>in</strong>g/return (to earth) may well also<br />

reflect a developed Son of Man Christology. 263 So it is certa<strong>in</strong>ly possible to conceive<br />

of this say<strong>in</strong>g emerg<strong>in</strong>g as a prophetic utterance with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> earliest<br />

churches' mission, 264 that is, before a Gentile mission got underway or was fully<br />

accepted among <strong>the</strong> churches of Judea and Galilee. 265<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> Gentile mission did beg<strong>in</strong> very early and was evi-<br />

259. Kümmel, 'Eschatological Expectation' 38; also Promise 60-61; Davies and<br />

Allison, Mat<strong>the</strong>w 19-28 367-68 concur.<br />

260. As many conclude; see, e.g., Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.344-47; Pesch argues that<br />

Mark 9.1 was <strong>the</strong> basis for 13.30 (Markusevangelium 308), whereas Beasley-Murray follows<br />

A. Vögtle <strong>in</strong> argu<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence was <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r way round, with 13.30 closer to <strong>the</strong> Q say<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Matt. 23.36/Luke 11.51 (<strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom 190-93); but <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong><br />

latter and Mark 13.30 is too wide to provide much support for <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis (Gundry, Mark<br />

791).<br />

261. See above, chapter 10 n. 3.<br />

262. Kümmel, Promise 61-64; 'Eschatological Expectation' 44-45.<br />

263. See below §16.4f.<br />

264. Bor<strong>in</strong>g, Say<strong>in</strong>gs 209-11; Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.339-41; cf. Lüdemann, <strong>Jesus</strong> 168.<br />

265. 'The towns of Israel' might <strong>in</strong>clude Samaria (though note Matt. 10.5), but no diaspora<br />

settlement would be so designated.<br />

434

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!