Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§ 12.4 The Kingdom of God But that his disciples, knowing that he had done so, should nevertheless have imported such a thoroughgoing judgmental emphasis into the Jesus tradition is unrealistic. Such a development would imply both a disrespect for Jesus and a cavalier disregard in relation to their formative tradition, which does not square either with the character of oral tradition or with the esteem in which they held Jesus, as attested by the very fact of the Jesus tradition itself. 225 In this case the judgment in view is consistently final in overtone, and frequently (though not always) has the last judgment explicitly in view. That Jesus spoke quite often of such judgment, and of its outcome in heaven 226 and hell, 227 must also be considered very likely. And since the kingdom of God seems to be a way of speaking of heaven, in at least some instances, hell for Jesus was presumably understood as exclusion from the kingdom, with its terrifying consequences. f. Reward and Heavenly Banquet Another strand of the eschatological reversal theme is the prospect of reward or vindication held out to those who responded to Jesus' message. This too is a feature of the beatitudes (Matt. 5.3-6, 10-12/Luke 6.20-23; see above § 12.4c, d). The warning against being ashamed of Jesus (Mark 8.38 pars.) has a counterpart in the balanced antithesis, 'Those who confess me will be spoken for, those who deny me will be denied' (Matt. 10.32-33/Luke 12.8-9). 228 Faithful servants will be rewarded. 229 Triply attested is the promise that whoever loses his or her life (for Jesus' sake) will save it. 230 Jesus is remembered as promising to those who 225. 'Surely here is a theme that is so much a part of the tradition that, were one to deny it to Jesus, the very possibility of the modern quest would fall into disrepute for the reason that the sources are too untrustworthy' (Allison, Jesus of Nazareth 103). 226. Mark 10.21 pars.; Mark 12.25/Matt. 22.30; Matt. 5.12/Luke 6.23; Matt. 6.20/Luke 12.33; Matt. 5.16; Luke 10.20. 227. Hades in Matt. 11.23/Luke 10.15; Luke 16.23. Gehenna in Mark 9.43, 45, 47/Matt. 5.29-30/18.8-9; Matt. 10.28/Luke 12.5; Matt. 5.22; 23.15, 33. The (eternal) fire in Mark 9.43/ Matt. 18.8-9; Mark 9.48; Matt. 5.22; 7.19; 13.40, 42, 50; 25.41; as already in the Baptist's preaching (Matt. 3.10-12/Luke 3.9, 16-17). Chilton maintains that the reference to Gehenna in Mark 9.47-48 is drawn from the closing words of the Targum of Isaiah (Galilean Rabbi 101- 102, 107-108). 228. 'This calling of a person to account before the coming God . .. was the center of Jesus' expectation of judgment.. . not the pouring out of anonymous historical and cosmic catastrophes upon "this generation" . . .' (Goppelt, Theology 1.122). See further below, §16.4c(3). 229. Matt. 24.45-47/Luke 12.42-44; Matt. 25.20-23/Luke 19.16-19; Luke 6.35; Matt. 20.8; Luke 10.7. The language of (eschatological) reward (misthos) is also used in Mark 9.41/ Matt. 10.42; Matt. 5.12/Luke 6.23; Matt. 6.1, (2, 5, 16). The theme is lacking in Thomas. See also below, §12.4g. 230. Mark 8.35 pars.; Matt. 10.39/Luke 17.33; John 12.25 (one of the Synoptic-like tra- 425

§ 12.4 The K<strong>in</strong>gdom of God<br />

But that his disciples, know<strong>in</strong>g that he had done so, should never<strong>the</strong>less have imported<br />

such a thoroughgo<strong>in</strong>g judgmental emphasis <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition is unrealistic.<br />

Such a development would imply both a disrespect for <strong>Jesus</strong> and a cavalier<br />

disregard <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong>ir formative tradition, which does not square ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with <strong>the</strong> character of oral tradition or with <strong>the</strong> esteem <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y held <strong>Jesus</strong>, as<br />

attested by <strong>the</strong> very fact of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition itself. 225<br />

In this case <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>in</strong> view is consistently f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong> overtone, and frequently<br />

(though not always) has <strong>the</strong> last judgment explicitly <strong>in</strong> view. That <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

spoke quite often of such judgment, and of its outcome <strong>in</strong> heaven 226 and hell, 227<br />

must also be considered very likely. And s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God seems to be a<br />

way of speak<strong>in</strong>g of heaven, <strong>in</strong> at least some <strong>in</strong>stances, hell for <strong>Jesus</strong> was presumably<br />

understood as exclusion from <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom, with its terrify<strong>in</strong>g consequences.<br />

f. Reward and Heavenly Banquet<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r strand of <strong>the</strong> eschatological reversal <strong>the</strong>me is <strong>the</strong> prospect of reward or<br />

v<strong>in</strong>dication held out to those who responded to <strong>Jesus</strong>' message. This too is a feature<br />

of <strong>the</strong> beatitudes (Matt. 5.3-6, 10-12/Luke 6.20-23; see above § 12.4c, d).<br />

The warn<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st be<strong>in</strong>g ashamed of <strong>Jesus</strong> (Mark 8.38 pars.) has a counterpart<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> balanced anti<strong>the</strong>sis, 'Those who confess me will be spoken for, those who<br />

deny me will be denied' (Matt. 10.32-33/Luke 12.8-9). 228 Faithful servants will<br />

be rewarded. 229 Triply attested is <strong>the</strong> promise that whoever loses his or her life<br />

(for <strong>Jesus</strong>' sake) will save it. 230 <strong>Jesus</strong> is remembered as promis<strong>in</strong>g to those who<br />

225. 'Surely here is a <strong>the</strong>me that is so much a part of <strong>the</strong> tradition that, were one to deny<br />

it to <strong>Jesus</strong>, <strong>the</strong> very possibility of <strong>the</strong> modern quest would fall <strong>in</strong>to disrepute for <strong>the</strong> reason that<br />

<strong>the</strong> sources are too untrustworthy' (Allison, <strong>Jesus</strong> of Nazareth 103).<br />

226. Mark 10.21 pars.; Mark 12.25/Matt. 22.30; Matt. 5.12/Luke 6.23; Matt. 6.20/Luke<br />

12.33; Matt. 5.16; Luke 10.20.<br />

227. Hades <strong>in</strong> Matt. 11.23/Luke 10.15; Luke 16.23. Gehenna <strong>in</strong> Mark 9.43, 45, 47/Matt.<br />

5.29-30/18.8-9; Matt. 10.28/Luke 12.5; Matt. 5.22; 23.15, 33. The (eternal) fire <strong>in</strong> Mark 9.43/<br />

Matt. 18.8-9; Mark 9.48; Matt. 5.22; 7.19; 13.40, 42, 50; 25.41; as already <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baptist's<br />

preach<strong>in</strong>g (Matt. 3.10-12/Luke 3.9, 16-17). Chilton ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that <strong>the</strong> reference to Gehenna <strong>in</strong><br />

Mark 9.47-48 is drawn from <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g words of <strong>the</strong> Targum of Isaiah (Galilean Rabbi 101-<br />

102, 107-108).<br />

228. 'This call<strong>in</strong>g of a person to account before <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g God . .. was <strong>the</strong> center of <strong>Jesus</strong>'<br />

expectation of judgment.. . not <strong>the</strong> pour<strong>in</strong>g out of anonymous historical and cosmic catastrophes<br />

upon "this generation" . . .' (Goppelt, Theology 1.122). See fur<strong>the</strong>r below, §16.4c(3).<br />

229. Matt. 24.45-47/Luke 12.42-44; Matt. 25.20-23/Luke 19.16-19; Luke 6.35; Matt.<br />

20.8; Luke 10.7. The language of (eschatological) reward (misthos) is also used <strong>in</strong> Mark 9.41/<br />

Matt. 10.42; Matt. 5.12/Luke 6.23; Matt. 6.1, (2, 5, 16). The <strong>the</strong>me is lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Thomas. See<br />

also below, §12.4g.<br />

230. Mark 8.35 pars.; Matt. 10.39/Luke 17.33; John 12.25 (one of <strong>the</strong> Synoptic-like tra-<br />

425

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!