09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MISSION OF JESUS §12.4<br />

ephthasen; 129 but a different Aramaic form is equally possible (qereb, 'approach'),<br />

130 and Q's use of different Greek verbs presumably <strong>in</strong>dicates an awareness<br />

early <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition<strong>in</strong>g process of a significant difference between <strong>the</strong> two<br />

say<strong>in</strong>gs. It is certa<strong>in</strong>ly difficult to give engize<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> verb used <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />

Markan and Q passages, any o<strong>the</strong>r sense than 'come near'. 131<br />

The sense, <strong>the</strong>n, is of imm<strong>in</strong>ence ra<strong>the</strong>r than of presence. 132 Whatever underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Aramaic may be detected, <strong>the</strong> Greek is clear enough. The Evangelists<br />

would presumably have had no doubt that <strong>the</strong> event which had thus brought <strong>the</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>gdom near was <strong>the</strong> mission of <strong>Jesus</strong>. But <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> emphasis was so<br />

fixed and so central <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition, for earliest missionaries and churches,<br />

strongly suggests that this was <strong>the</strong> emphasis beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> fix<strong>in</strong>g and reuse of <strong>the</strong><br />

tradition from <strong>the</strong> first. It was disciples who recalled <strong>Jesus</strong> as so preach<strong>in</strong>g; it had<br />

been an important factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir becom<strong>in</strong>g disciples. It was as disciples who already<br />

saw <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> an event of f<strong>in</strong>al significance that <strong>the</strong>y no doubt thus established<br />

and thus rehearsed <strong>the</strong> tradition.<br />

What was it that had drawn near? God's k<strong>in</strong>gdom, <strong>the</strong> exercise of God's<br />

k<strong>in</strong>gship, <strong>the</strong> manifestation of God's sovereignty. The say<strong>in</strong>g adds noth<strong>in</strong>g to our<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of '<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God' per se. It focuses only on <strong>the</strong> nearness of<br />

<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom's appear<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> same head<strong>in</strong>g we should note also <strong>the</strong> parable of <strong>the</strong> budd<strong>in</strong>g fig<br />

tree, which all three Synoptic Evangelists have <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> apocalyptic discourse<br />

(Mark 13.28-29 pars.). The tradition uses <strong>the</strong> term engys ('near') twice:<br />

From <strong>the</strong> fig tree learn <strong>the</strong> parable: when already its branch has become tender<br />

and it puts forth its leaves, you know that <strong>the</strong> summer is near. So also<br />

when you have seen <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs happen<strong>in</strong>g, you know that it is near, at <strong>the</strong><br />

gates.<br />

The reference to what is near is unclear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mark/Mat<strong>the</strong>an form of <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g<br />

itself, though Luke identifies it as '<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God'. 133 But <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g does<br />

129. C. H. Dodd, The Parables of <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom (London: Religious Book Club, 1935,<br />

3 1936) 44.<br />

130. Dalman, Words of <strong>Jesus</strong> 106-107; Taylor, Mark 166-67; Black, Aramaic Approach<br />

208-11; Chilton, Pure K<strong>in</strong>gdom 61-62; similar strictures <strong>in</strong> Casey, Aramaic Sources 27.<br />

131. W. G. Kümmel, Verheissung und Erfüllung ( 3 1956), ET Promise and Fulfilment:<br />

The Eschatological Message of <strong>Jesus</strong> (London: SCM, 2 1961) 24; McKnight, New Vision 123;<br />

see fur<strong>the</strong>r below, § 12.5a.<br />

132. Meier is less confident about <strong>the</strong> force of <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>cludes it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'already<br />

present' category (Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.430-34); Crossan follows Kelber <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g 1.14-15 <strong>in</strong> conjunction<br />

with Mark 6.12, as '<strong>the</strong> gospel of <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom's hidden presence' (Historical <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

345); see also below, n. 280.<br />

133. By sequenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> apocalyptic discourse as he does, Mark, followed<br />

408

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!