09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§ 12.4 The K<strong>in</strong>gdom of God<br />

a. The K<strong>in</strong>gdom Has Drawn Near<br />

We have already <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>the</strong> headl<strong>in</strong>e and summary with which Mark <strong>in</strong>troduces<br />

his account of <strong>Jesus</strong>' mission: '<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God has drawn near<br />

(engiken)' (Mark 1.15). Mat<strong>the</strong>w follows him (Matt. 4.17). We also observed<br />

that <strong>the</strong> parallel accounts of <strong>the</strong> send<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong> disciples on mission (Q)<br />

have <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong>structed by <strong>Jesus</strong> to deliver precisely <strong>the</strong> same message: 'The<br />

k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God/heaven has drawn near' (Matt. 10.7/Luke 10.9; Luke<br />

10.11). 124 This is a notable fact and one not to be lightly discounted, that Mark<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Q tradition agree <strong>in</strong> summaris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> message of <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> precisely <strong>the</strong><br />

same words. Arguments about whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> various elements of Mark 1.15 go<br />

back to <strong>Jesus</strong> or are redactional 125 cont<strong>in</strong>ue to owe too much to a literary edit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conception of <strong>the</strong> tradition<strong>in</strong>g process. Here as elsewhere, it almost does<br />

not matter whe<strong>the</strong>r we can recover <strong>the</strong> precise words of <strong>Jesus</strong>. What matters is<br />

that this form of words had become fixed and established <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> re-preach<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>the</strong> earliest missionaries and churches as <strong>the</strong> central summary of <strong>Jesus</strong>' preach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom.<br />

The force of <strong>the</strong> verb is also clear: <strong>the</strong> perfect tense (engiken) here <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

an action already performed and result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a state or effect which cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> present. 126 It is not a timeless nearness which is <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d; someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

had happened to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom near. 127 The term<strong>in</strong>ology is no doubt deliberate:<br />

<strong>the</strong> Evangelists would have known well enough <strong>the</strong> difference between<br />

'near' and 'far' (makran), 128 and <strong>the</strong> Q tradents were certa<strong>in</strong>ly aware of <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom had (already) come (ephthasen) (Matt. 12.28/<br />

Luke 11.20). C. H. Dodd famously blurred this difference by hypo<strong>the</strong>siz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

same Aramaic term (m e ta, 'reach, arrive') beh<strong>in</strong>d both Mark's engiken and Q's<br />

124. Luke's division of <strong>the</strong> mission material <strong>in</strong>to two missions is of little consequence<br />

here: Luke 9.2 (<strong>the</strong> mission of <strong>the</strong> twelve) simply reports <strong>Jesus</strong> commission<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> twelve 'to<br />

proclaim <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God' (note also 9.11 and 9.60); Luke 10.9 (<strong>the</strong> mission of <strong>the</strong> seventy)<br />

adds 'to you' ('<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God has drawn near to you'). For a brief survey of <strong>the</strong> discussion<br />

see Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.485 n. 155. Thomas has no parallel.<br />

125. E.g., J. Schlosser, Le Regne de Dieu dans les dits de <strong>Jesus</strong> (EB; Paris: Gabalda,<br />

1980) 96,105-106; Crossan, Fragments 54-56; Lüdemann, <strong>Jesus</strong> 10-11; on Luke 10.9 similarly<br />

Schürmann, Gottes Reich 96-100. The reference to '<strong>the</strong> gospel' is certa<strong>in</strong>ly Mark's formulation<br />

(see above, n. 3). The <strong>Jesus</strong> Sem<strong>in</strong>ar regard <strong>the</strong> whole of Mark 1.15 as late (apart from <strong>the</strong> reference<br />

to <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God, 'God's imperial rule') because '<strong>Jesus</strong>' disciples remembered his<br />

public discourse as consist<strong>in</strong>g primarily of aphorisms, parables, or a challenge followed by a<br />

verbal retort' (Funk, Five Gospels 40).<br />

126. Good parallel illustrations of <strong>the</strong> usage are provided by Mark 14.42/Matt. 26.46;<br />

Luke 21.20; Rom. 13.12.<br />

127. See particularly Merkle<strong>in</strong>, Jesu Botschaft 51-53, 56-58.<br />

128. Cf. particularly Mark 12.34; Acts 2.39.<br />

407

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!