09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MISSION OF JESUS §12.4<br />

Given, <strong>the</strong>n, that we want to be look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> broad picture ra<strong>the</strong>r than attempt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to draw large conclusions from <strong>in</strong>dividual texts (§10.2), I will focus primarily<br />

on characteristic emphases and <strong>the</strong>mes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition. The fact that<br />

<strong>the</strong> performers of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition evidently grouped similar <strong>the</strong>matic material<br />

(as we shall see) encourages <strong>the</strong> view that from earliest days <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process characteristic emphases <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g formed stable reference po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

round which o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition could be ga<strong>the</strong>red. In so say<strong>in</strong>g I do not at all<br />

dispute that <strong>the</strong>re is good evidence of compositional technique and redactional<br />

material <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present forms of <strong>the</strong> tradition and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Q material evident beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w and Luke. 122 My po<strong>in</strong>t is ra<strong>the</strong>r that whole <strong>the</strong>mes are usually left<br />

largely unaffected by <strong>the</strong> redaction and are not best expla<strong>in</strong>ed by be<strong>in</strong>g attributed<br />

holus-bolus to factional redaction. The consistency of such emphases across<br />

Mark, Q, Mat<strong>the</strong>w, and Luke (and often Thomas, too) surely bears evidence of<br />

<strong>the</strong> impact made by <strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Jesus</strong> himself.<br />

We have already gleaned a summary grasp of Jewish eschatological expectation<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> exercise of God's k<strong>in</strong>gship. And <strong>Jesus</strong>' mentor, <strong>the</strong> Baptist,<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly proclaimed a future and imm<strong>in</strong>ent judgment. So it makes sense to start<br />

with a review of <strong>the</strong> future emphasis <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' preach<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom. And<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce it is <strong>the</strong> future emphasis of <strong>Jesus</strong>' own teach<strong>in</strong>g which has once aga<strong>in</strong> become<br />

most controversial, it will require special attention. I will structure <strong>the</strong> review<br />

round <strong>the</strong> explicit k<strong>in</strong>gdom references but <strong>in</strong>clude o<strong>the</strong>r elements of <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

tradition with <strong>the</strong> same or related emphases. 123<br />

12.4. The K<strong>in</strong>gdom to Come<br />

The future emphasis <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' k<strong>in</strong>gdom proclamation can be exposed to view<br />

fairly readily.<br />

122. Well marshalled and discussed, e.g., by Schürmann, Gottes Reich; Kloppenborg,<br />

Formation; Catchpole, Quest.<br />

123. But I leave aside <strong>the</strong> Son of Man material for <strong>the</strong> time be<strong>in</strong>g. In <strong>the</strong> neo-Liberal<br />

quest (Crossan, Historical <strong>Jesus</strong> 238-59; also Borg — see chapter 4 n. 173 above) and <strong>in</strong> discussions<br />

of Q (chapter 4 n. 175), <strong>the</strong> Son of Man motif has tended to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> issue of eschatology<br />

(versus apocalyptic) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition. It is important, <strong>the</strong>refore, to recognize <strong>the</strong><br />

extent and character of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition's eschatology (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g future eschatology) apart<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Son of Man issue (cf. Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.350; Reiser, <strong>Jesus</strong> and Judgment 203-<br />

204). C. A. Evans, 'Daniel <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament: Visions of God's K<strong>in</strong>gdom', <strong>in</strong> J. Coll<strong>in</strong>s and<br />

P. Fl<strong>in</strong>t, eds., The Book of Daniel (Leiden: Brill, 2001) 2.490-527, argues that much of <strong>Jesus</strong>'<br />

eschatology was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by <strong>the</strong>mes and images derived from Daniel, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

of God, its imm<strong>in</strong>ence, and its mysteriousness (510-23).<br />

406

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!