09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§12.1 The K<strong>in</strong>gdom, of God<br />

<strong>the</strong> references just cited are redactional, added by <strong>the</strong> Evangelists when <strong>the</strong>y<br />

composed <strong>the</strong>ir Gospels. 9 And we may be sure that o<strong>the</strong>rs were <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

various retell<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> tradition which preceded <strong>the</strong> transition to written tradition.<br />

10 But we may be equally confident that such retell<strong>in</strong>g and redaction reflected<br />

an awareness, on <strong>the</strong> part of both <strong>the</strong> tradents and <strong>the</strong>ir audiences, that <strong>the</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>gdom had been a prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>the</strong>me of <strong>Jesus</strong>' preach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom emphases of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition, <strong>in</strong>deed, we should probably<br />

see a prime example of <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition was performed and<br />

handed on — by re-present<strong>in</strong>g a known and familiar <strong>the</strong>me with explanatory and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r embellishments appropriate to <strong>the</strong> particular situation — ra<strong>the</strong>r as <strong>in</strong> musical<br />

performance 'grace notes' embellish a <strong>the</strong>me and br<strong>in</strong>g out its highlights. An<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g case <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t is probably <strong>the</strong> parable tradition. <strong>Jesus</strong> was evidently remembered<br />

as us<strong>in</strong>g parables to illustrate or illum<strong>in</strong>e what he had <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d when<br />

he spoke of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom. This is <strong>the</strong> testimony of both Mark (4.26, 30; cf. 4.11)<br />

and Q (Matt. 13.33/Luke 13.20). But Mat<strong>the</strong>w's much more extensive use of <strong>the</strong><br />

motif ('<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of heaven is like . . .') 11 may <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> technique of <strong>the</strong><br />

story-teller retell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> parables as much as <strong>Jesus</strong>' own characteristic style. The<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t here is that it would make little difference ei<strong>the</strong>r way: whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

himself <strong>in</strong>troduced all <strong>the</strong>se parables (and o<strong>the</strong>rs) with this formula, he was remembered<br />

as characteristically teach<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom by us<strong>in</strong>g parables. 12<br />

This consistency of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition and frequency with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition<br />

contrasts both with what we know of <strong>the</strong> early churches and with <strong>the</strong> traditions<br />

of Second Temple Judaism. In both cases, <strong>the</strong> imagery of God as k<strong>in</strong>g and of God's<br />

k<strong>in</strong>gdom is familiar. But <strong>in</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r case is it as prom<strong>in</strong>ent as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Scriptures and post-biblical writ<strong>in</strong>gs of Second Temple Judaism <strong>the</strong> phrase<br />

itself is hardly attested, and though reference is made to God's 'k<strong>in</strong>gdom' or 'k<strong>in</strong>gship',<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me is not particularly prom<strong>in</strong>ent. 13 As for usage among <strong>the</strong> early<br />

9. E.g., Matt. 3.2; 13.19, 52; 16.19; 21.43.<br />

10. Possible examples are Matt. 7.21; 8.12; 23.13; 24.14; Mark 9.47; 11.10; 12.34; Luke<br />

18.29; 21.31; 22.16, 29-30.<br />

11. Matt. 13.24, 31, 33, 44, 45, 47; 18.23; 20.1; 22.2; 25.1.<br />

12. See also Jeremias, Parables 100-101.<br />

13. 'The k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God' (Wis. 10.10; Pss. Sol. 17.3). 'The k<strong>in</strong>gdom (malkut) of<br />

Yahweh' (1 Chr. 28.5; 2 Chr. 13.8); 'my k<strong>in</strong>gdom' (1 Chr. 17.14); 'his k<strong>in</strong>gdom' (Ps. 103.19;<br />

Dan. 4.34; 6.26; Tob. 13.1; Wis. 6.4); 'your k<strong>in</strong>gdom'(Ps. 145.11-13; Pss. Sol. 5.18). 'K<strong>in</strong>gship<br />

(mamlaka, meluka)' belongs to God (1 Chr. 29.11; Ps. 22.28; Obad. 21). Aramaic malkuta'<br />

(Dan. 3.33; 4.34). Lat<strong>in</strong> regnum (T. Mos. 10.1). The fullest recent review is by O. Camponovo,<br />

Königtum, Königsherrschaft und Reich Gottes <strong>in</strong> den frühjüdischen Schriften (OBO 58;<br />

Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1984), conclud<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gship of God is not a major <strong>the</strong>me<br />

<strong>in</strong> early Jewish literature and that it functions 'as a symbol, not as a precisely def<strong>in</strong>ed concept'<br />

(437-38). The sparse f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> regard to <strong>the</strong> DSS have to be qualified by <strong>the</strong> publication of<br />

C. Newsom, Songs of <strong>the</strong> Sabbath Sacrifice: A Critical Edition (Atlanta: Scholars, 1985). In<br />

385

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!