09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§11.5 Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> Baptism of John<br />

we have seen, <strong>the</strong> judgmental role attributed by John to <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g one seems to<br />

be much more 'f<strong>in</strong>al'.<br />

(4) The traditional Christian <strong>in</strong>terpretation of John's words is that he expected<br />

<strong>the</strong> Messiah. 159 The problem here, as aga<strong>in</strong> we shall see later (§15.2), is<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re was no clear-cut or simple expectation of '<strong>the</strong> Messiah' <strong>in</strong> Second<br />

Temple Judaism. Moreover, messianic expectation did not usually envisage a figure<br />

of fire, as we see <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most likely precedent (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Psalms of Solomon) for<br />

such an expectation. 160 There is more obscurity here than <strong>the</strong> traditional Christian<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation has allowed.<br />

A question too seldom asked is whe<strong>the</strong>r John himself had a clear idea of<br />

who <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g one was to be. In fact <strong>the</strong> identification could hardly be less explicit<br />

— someone follow<strong>in</strong>g John who would be stronger and greater than John.<br />

Subsequently John is remembered as send<strong>in</strong>g disciples to ask <strong>Jesus</strong>, 'Are you <strong>the</strong><br />

one com<strong>in</strong>g, or should we expect someone else?' (Matt. 11.3/Luke 7.19). There<br />

is no good reason why this question should not reflect John's earlier expectation.<br />

161 In which case it tells us that John had no clear idea as to who was to follow<br />

him. That <strong>the</strong> question could be posed <strong>in</strong> regard to <strong>Jesus</strong> presumably confirms<br />

<strong>the</strong> unlikelihood that John had <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d God or <strong>the</strong> Son of Man. The only<br />

clue John had himself was <strong>the</strong> judgmental role he attributed to <strong>the</strong> one to come.<br />

So we should probably not attempt to be more specific than John was himself. In<br />

historical terms, John may simply have had a conviction that someone much<br />

more significant was to follow, and that he had to baptize <strong>in</strong> preparation for a<br />

much more fearful baptism. 162 With that we will have to be content.<br />

11.5. <strong>Jesus</strong>' Ano<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g at Jordan<br />

This event is presumably to be regarded as <strong>the</strong> real beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Jesus</strong>' mission<br />

and <strong>the</strong>refore as deserv<strong>in</strong>g of particular attention. Would John's baptism and<br />

159. So also C. H. Scobie, John <strong>the</strong> Baptist (London: SCM, 1964) 62-67; R. Leivestad,<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> His Own Perspective (M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Augsburg, 1987) 36-37, 40.1 have serious doubts<br />

as to whe<strong>the</strong>r a historical rem<strong>in</strong>iscence of <strong>the</strong> Baptist's preach<strong>in</strong>g can be detected beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong><br />

strongly <strong>the</strong>ologized rework<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Johann<strong>in</strong>e tradition (with reference to John 1.29); but see<br />

Brown, John 1.58-63.<br />

160. Pss. Sol. 17.21-43; 18.5-7. The imagery of 'cleans<strong>in</strong>g' (katharize<strong>in</strong>) is stronger<br />

(Pss. Sol 17.22, 30; 18.5). But R. Bauckham, 'The Messianic Interpretation of Isa. 10.34 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Dead Sea Scrolls, 2 Baruch and <strong>the</strong> Preach<strong>in</strong>g of John <strong>the</strong> Baptist', DSD 2 (1995) 202-16, sees<br />

evidence <strong>in</strong> 4Qplsa a [4Q16] 8-10.2-9 and 4Q285 5.1-6 that Isa. 10.34 had already been connected<br />

with 11.1-5 and given a messianic <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />

161. See below §12.5c.<br />

162. Similarly Meier, Marg<strong>in</strong>al Jew 2.35, 132.<br />

371

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!