Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§11.3 Beginning from the Baptism of John In the latter (GTh 78), any allusion to John is absent (given only by the Q introduction). This is significant. For the distinguishing feature and frame of the 'gospel form' evident in all the canonical Gospels is provided not only by the Passion, but also by its beginning with John and his baptism, as attested also by Q. If the Thomas tradition is old, then those who made use of it can hardly have been unaware of this (as GTh 46 probably confirms). In which case it looks as though the Thomas tradents have deliberately abbreviated the Baptist motif. This suggests in turn a conscious elimination by the Thomas tradents of the strong note of imminent judgment, which characterizes the Q account of John's preaching (Q 3.7-9, 16-17), as part of a broader redactional diminution of the larger judgment motif in the Q/Synoptic tradition. This line of reasoning runs counter to the arguments of Koester and others that the theme of judgment in Q is a redactional development of Q (= Q 2 ) unknown to Thomas. 11 On the contrary, it rather looks as though Thomas omits what was a clear recollection (in Q) of John's significance for the first disciples of Jesus and of (or despite) the judgmental character of John's preaching. 78 It will be well to bear in mind this initial finding since it will have bearing on our attempts to hear again the preaching of Jesus through the ears of his first disciples. For the moment, however, the initial conclusion can be fully affirmed, that John was seen as the beginning of the good news of Jesus from the earliest days of discipleship to Jesus. 11.3. John's Baptism The significance of John independently of Jesus and of his likely influence on Jesus makes it all the more important to understand as fully as possible this immediate antecedent to Jesus, the springboard, perhaps, from which Jesus launched his own career as a preacher. a. 'The Baptist' Of the little we know about John, the most outstanding feature was clearly his baptism. This is the point on which all accounts agree most closely. Mark introduces John as 'baptizing in the desert' (Mark 1.4), or as 'the baptizer' (ho baptizön) (6.14, 24). 79 He sums up John's message as 'proclaiming a baptism of 77. Koester, Ancient Christian Gospels 86-99 (here 96-97). See further above §7.4c. 78. See A. Kirk, 'Upbraiding Wisdom: John's Speech and the Beginning of Q (Q 3:7-9, 16-17)', NovT 40 (1998) 1-16; and further below §12.4e. 79. The original text of Mark 1.4 may well have lacked the definite article: 'John came 355

§11.3 Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> Baptism of John<br />

In <strong>the</strong> latter (GTh 78), any allusion to John is absent (given only by <strong>the</strong> Q <strong>in</strong>troduction).<br />

This is significant. For <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g feature and frame of <strong>the</strong> 'gospel<br />

form' evident <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> canonical Gospels is provided not only by <strong>the</strong> Passion,<br />

but also by its beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with John and his baptism, as attested also by Q. If<br />

<strong>the</strong> Thomas tradition is old, <strong>the</strong>n those who made use of it can hardly have been<br />

unaware of this (as GTh 46 probably confirms). In which case it looks as though<br />

<strong>the</strong> Thomas tradents have deliberately abbreviated <strong>the</strong> Baptist motif. This suggests<br />

<strong>in</strong> turn a conscious elim<strong>in</strong>ation by <strong>the</strong> Thomas tradents of <strong>the</strong> strong note of<br />

imm<strong>in</strong>ent judgment, which characterizes <strong>the</strong> Q account of John's preach<strong>in</strong>g (Q<br />

3.7-9, 16-17), as part of a broader redactional dim<strong>in</strong>ution of <strong>the</strong> larger judgment<br />

motif <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Q/Synoptic tradition. This l<strong>in</strong>e of reason<strong>in</strong>g runs counter to <strong>the</strong> arguments<br />

of Koester and o<strong>the</strong>rs that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of judgment <strong>in</strong> Q is a redactional development<br />

of Q (= Q 2 ) unknown to Thomas. 11 On <strong>the</strong> contrary, it ra<strong>the</strong>r looks as<br />

though Thomas omits what was a clear recollection (<strong>in</strong> Q) of John's significance<br />

for <strong>the</strong> first disciples of <strong>Jesus</strong> and of (or despite) <strong>the</strong> judgmental character of<br />

John's preach<strong>in</strong>g. 78 It will be well to bear <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d this <strong>in</strong>itial f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce it will<br />

have bear<strong>in</strong>g on our attempts to hear aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preach<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Jesus</strong> through <strong>the</strong><br />

ears of his first disciples.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> moment, however, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial conclusion can be fully affirmed, that<br />

John was seen as <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> good news of <strong>Jesus</strong> from <strong>the</strong> earliest days<br />

of discipleship to <strong>Jesus</strong>.<br />

11.3. John's Baptism<br />

The significance of John <strong>in</strong>dependently of <strong>Jesus</strong> and of his likely <strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

makes it all <strong>the</strong> more important to understand as fully as possible this immediate<br />

antecedent to <strong>Jesus</strong>, <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>gboard, perhaps, from which <strong>Jesus</strong> launched<br />

his own career as a preacher.<br />

a. 'The Baptist'<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> little we know about John, <strong>the</strong> most outstand<strong>in</strong>g feature was clearly his<br />

baptism. This is <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t on which all accounts agree most closely. Mark <strong>in</strong>troduces<br />

John as 'baptiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> desert' (Mark 1.4), or as '<strong>the</strong> baptizer' (ho<br />

baptizön) (6.14, 24). 79 He sums up John's message as 'proclaim<strong>in</strong>g a baptism of<br />

77. Koester, Ancient Christian Gospels 86-99 (here 96-97). See fur<strong>the</strong>r above §7.4c.<br />

78. See A. Kirk, 'Upbraid<strong>in</strong>g Wisdom: John's Speech and <strong>the</strong> Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of Q (Q 3:7-9,<br />

16-17)', NovT 40 (1998) 1-16; and fur<strong>the</strong>r below §12.4e.<br />

79. The orig<strong>in</strong>al text of Mark 1.4 may well have lacked <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ite article: 'John came<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!