Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§9.3 The Historical Context 'within Judaism' or emerging from 'within Judaism', we will have to be conscious of the strong nationalist overtones in the term's early use, and of the degree to which national and religious identity were fused in the one word — including not only differentiation from but also a certain hostility to the other nations and their religious practices. 9.3. The Diversity of Judaism — Judaism from Without What counts as Judaism in Palestine in the first century? What falls within the scope of 'Judaism' in the late Second Temple period? How broad and encompassing was or can 'Judaism' be (from our perspective) as a historical description? A natural and popular response has been to look at the different groups and writings of the period. And though this approach is open to objection, as we shall see, a description of these groups and writings does form an important part of our understanding of first-century Judaism, particularly of its diversity. In this section, then, our first objective is, briefly, to give some indication of the range of practice and belief covered by (Palestinian/late Second Temple) 'Judaism' as a phenomenological description. 43 In each case the key question is: If this too is 'Judaism', what does that tell us about 'Judaism'? Although much of the evidence available is fragmentary, often hostile and sometimes minimal, in most cases we have enough information to work with, and modern treatments have improved markedly in quality and reliability over the last two decades. a. The Four 'Sects' The usual starting point has been Josephus' 'four philosophies' or 'sects' (haireseis) 44 — not unnaturally since Josephus' way of introducing them seems to imply that these were the only groupings among the Jews worthy of attention on the part of his readers (War 2.119-166; Ant. 18.11-25). 45 To begin with 43. The objective is limited: I have no intention of attempting a full description of the groups and elements which made up Second Temple Judaism. 44. Note the various discussions on the use of terms like 'sect' in S. J. D. Cohen, From the Maccabees to the Mishnah (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1987) ch. 5; A. J. Saldarini, Pharisees, Scribes and Sadducees in Palestinian Society (Edinburgh: Clark, 1988) particularly 70- 73, 123-27 (Saldarini prefers the translation 'schools of thought'); M. Hengel and R. Deines, 'E. P. Sanders' "Common Judaism", Jesus, and the Pharisees', JTS 46 (1995) 1-70 (here 43- 45); a fuller version in Hengel, Judaica et Hellenistica: Kleine Schriften I (WUNT 90; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1996) 392-479. 45. In reference to the debate as to whether Josephus really thought of four rather than 265

§9.3 The Historical Context<br />

'with<strong>in</strong> Judaism' or emerg<strong>in</strong>g from 'with<strong>in</strong> Judaism', we will have to be conscious<br />

of <strong>the</strong> strong nationalist overtones <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> term's early use, and of <strong>the</strong> degree<br />

to which national and religious identity were fused <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> one word — <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

not only differentiation from but also a certa<strong>in</strong> hostility to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

nations and <strong>the</strong>ir religious practices.<br />

9.3. The Diversity of Judaism — Judaism from Without<br />

What counts as Judaism <strong>in</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first century? What falls with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

scope of 'Judaism' <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late Second Temple period? How broad and encompass<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was or can 'Judaism' be (from our perspective) as a historical description?<br />

A natural and popular response has been to look at <strong>the</strong> different groups and<br />

writ<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> period. And though this approach is open to objection, as we shall<br />

see, a description of <strong>the</strong>se groups and writ<strong>in</strong>gs does form an important part of our<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of first-century Judaism, particularly of its diversity. In this section,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n, our first objective is, briefly, to give some <strong>in</strong>dication of <strong>the</strong> range of<br />

practice and belief covered by (Palest<strong>in</strong>ian/late Second Temple) 'Judaism' as a<br />

phenomenological description. 43 In each case <strong>the</strong> key question is: If this too is<br />

'Judaism', what does that tell us about 'Judaism'? Although much of <strong>the</strong> evidence<br />

available is fragmentary, often hostile and sometimes m<strong>in</strong>imal, <strong>in</strong> most<br />

cases we have enough <strong>in</strong>formation to work with, and modern treatments have improved<br />

markedly <strong>in</strong> quality and reliability over <strong>the</strong> last two decades.<br />

a. The Four 'Sects'<br />

The usual start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t has been Josephus' 'four philosophies' or 'sects'<br />

(haireseis) 44 — not unnaturally s<strong>in</strong>ce Josephus' way of <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m seems<br />

to imply that <strong>the</strong>se were <strong>the</strong> only group<strong>in</strong>gs among <strong>the</strong> Jews worthy of attention<br />

on <strong>the</strong> part of his readers (War 2.119-166; Ant. 18.11-25). 45 To beg<strong>in</strong> with<br />

43. The objective is limited: I have no <strong>in</strong>tention of attempt<strong>in</strong>g a full description of <strong>the</strong><br />

groups and elements which made up Second Temple Judaism.<br />

44. Note <strong>the</strong> various discussions on <strong>the</strong> use of terms like 'sect' <strong>in</strong> S. J. D. Cohen, From<br />

<strong>the</strong> Maccabees to <strong>the</strong> Mishnah (Philadelphia: Westm<strong>in</strong>ster, 1987) ch. 5; A. J. Saldar<strong>in</strong>i, Pharisees,<br />

Scribes and Sadducees <strong>in</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Society (Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh: Clark, 1988) particularly 70-<br />

73, 123-27 (Saldar<strong>in</strong>i prefers <strong>the</strong> translation 'schools of thought'); M. Hengel and R. De<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

'E. P. Sanders' "Common Judaism", <strong>Jesus</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> Pharisees', JTS 46 (1995) 1-70 (here 43-<br />

45); a fuller version <strong>in</strong> Hengel, Judaica et Hellenistica: Kle<strong>in</strong>e Schriften I (WUNT 90;<br />

Tüb<strong>in</strong>gen: Mohr Siebeck, 1996) 392-479.<br />

45. In reference to <strong>the</strong> debate as to whe<strong>the</strong>r Josephus really thought of four ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!