09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§9.1 The Historical Context<br />

'Middle Judaism' 18 has <strong>the</strong> advantage of dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Greco-Roman period<br />

from what went before (<strong>the</strong> 'ancient Judaism' of <strong>the</strong> sixth to fourth centuries<br />

BCE). But it raises <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>the</strong> issues of when we should start speak<strong>in</strong>g of 'Judaism'<br />

proper, whe<strong>the</strong>r 'Judaism' is a concept or simply a label, and <strong>the</strong> justification<br />

for and significance of mark<strong>in</strong>g off <strong>the</strong> pre-exilic period ('<strong>the</strong> religion of Israel')<br />

so sharply from <strong>the</strong> still biblical 'Judaism' of <strong>the</strong> return from exile. 19<br />

Probably <strong>the</strong> least objectionable and problematic term to use is 'Second Temple<br />

Judaism': it does not purport to denote 'Judaism' as such but <strong>the</strong> 'Judaism' which<br />

spanned <strong>the</strong> 600 or so years from <strong>the</strong> rebuild<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Temple <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late sixth<br />

century BCE to its destruction <strong>in</strong> 70 CE, a Judaism focused round <strong>the</strong> Jerusalem<br />

Temple.<br />

All this potential perplexity po<strong>in</strong>ts up <strong>the</strong> need to proceed cautiously if we<br />

are to avoid <strong>the</strong> danger of impos<strong>in</strong>g categories and grids which might distort <strong>the</strong><br />

evidence more than display it. In view of <strong>the</strong> confusion of def<strong>in</strong>itions which has<br />

weakened earlier debate we should obviously beg<strong>in</strong> with some clarification of<br />

<strong>the</strong> term 'Judaism' itself (§9.2). We can <strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong>dicate someth<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> range of<br />

beliefs and practices which that term, or more precisely, Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Judaism or<br />

Second Temple Judaism, may properly be used to categorise (§9.3). It will also<br />

be necessary to highlight <strong>the</strong> factionalism which was such a mark of <strong>the</strong> Judaism<br />

of <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> Second Temple period (§9.4), <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> light of which it<br />

will be still more press<strong>in</strong>g to clarify what it was that makes it possible to use <strong>the</strong><br />

same category, 'Judaism', for all <strong>the</strong> 'Judaisms'. What was <strong>the</strong> common ground<br />

which <strong>the</strong>y shared (§9.5)? F<strong>in</strong>ally we need to ask what difference it might have<br />

made that <strong>Jesus</strong> was brought up <strong>in</strong> Galilee (§§9.6-7) and rem<strong>in</strong>d ourselves of <strong>the</strong><br />

politics of <strong>the</strong> period and how <strong>the</strong>y would have <strong>in</strong>fluenced conditions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> time<br />

of <strong>Jesus</strong> (§9.8). All this should give us a clearer idea of what <strong>the</strong> description of<br />

someone as a 'Jew', whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Jesus</strong> or any o<strong>the</strong>r Jew, would have signified <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

first century CE. 20 The immediate results are summed up <strong>in</strong> a brief outl<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>Jesus</strong>'<br />

life and mission (§9.9).<br />

18. G. Boccacc<strong>in</strong>i, Middle Judaism: Jewish Thought, 300 BCE to 200 CE (M<strong>in</strong>neapolis:<br />

Fortress, 1991).<br />

19. The Anchor Bible Dictionary completes its articles on <strong>the</strong> 'History of Israel' with <strong>the</strong><br />

Persian period and beg<strong>in</strong>s its treatment of 'Judaism' with <strong>the</strong> Greco-Roman period (ABD 3.526-<br />

76, 3.1037-89).<br />

20. Cf. D. J. Harr<strong>in</strong>gton, 'The Jewishness of <strong>Jesus</strong>: Fac<strong>in</strong>g Some Problems' (1987), <strong>in</strong><br />

Charlesworth, ed., <strong>Jesus</strong>' Jewishness 123-36: 'Our <strong>in</strong>creased understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> diversity<br />

with<strong>in</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Judaism <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' time makes it difficult to know precisely what k<strong>in</strong>d of Jew<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> was and aga<strong>in</strong>st which background we should try to <strong>in</strong>terpret him'; '<strong>the</strong> more we know,<br />

<strong>the</strong> less we know' (136, 128). Similarly T. Holmen, 'The Jewishness of <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> "Third<br />

Quest'", <strong>in</strong> Labahn and Schmidt, eds., <strong>Jesus</strong>, Mark and Q 143-62. Meier: '<strong>the</strong> phrase <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Jew has become an academic cliche. The real challenge is to unpack that phrase and specify<br />

what sort of first-century Jew <strong>Jesus</strong> was' ('Present State of <strong>the</strong> "Third Quest"' 467). Meier pre-<br />

259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!