Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§9.1 The Historical Context which flourished in the heart of the land of Israel up to the 60s of the first century CE. This in turn has resulted in a renewed interest in the pseudepigrapha 1 ' and an increasing recognition that they too have to be described as representing different forms of Judaism. At the same time the extent of Pharisaic influence in firstcentury Israel has been radically questioned, 12 and the sharpness of any distinction between 'Judaism' and 'Hellenism' which had allowed a clear demarcation between 'Palestinian Judaism' and 'Hellenistic Judaism' has been considerably blurred. 13 Within a broader framework we could perhaps also note that the liberal thrust of so much western scholarship, reinforced more recently by postmodern suspicion, has progressively undermined the very idea of a 'norm'. In consequence the last two decades of the twentieth century witnessed an increasing tendency to emphasize the diverse character of first-century Judaism and to speak of several 'Judaisms' (plural), leaving the question of their legitimacy as forms of 'Judaism' unasked as being either misleading or improper. 14 Still too little explored, however, is the further or alternative question how this quite proper modern, phenomenological description of different Judaisms relates to the self-perception of each of these several Judaisms in their own day, not to mention their own evaluation of the other Judaisms. The main alternative option at this point for a historian of the period is to speak of 'Palestinian Judaism'. It is true that the name 'Palestine' came into formal use for the territory only in the second century CE, when, following the failure of the second Jewish Revolt (132-135), the Roman colony of Aelia Capitolina was reestablished, and Judea was renamed Syria Palaestina. But the usage itself is very old and common among Greco-Roman writers. Herodotus in the fifth century BCE already speaks of 'the Syrians of Palestine' (Hist. II. 10.3), 11. See particularly J. H. Charlesworth, ed., The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (2 vols.; London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1983, 1985) = OTP; also Charlesworth, Jesus ch. 2; H. F. D. Sparks, ed. The Apocryphal Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). 12. Differently by Neusner, Rabbinic Traditions; also From Politics to Piety; and by Sanders, particularly Judaism: Practice and Belief, 63 BCE-66 CE (London: SCM, 1992) ch. 18. 13. See chapter 5 n. 122; see also below n. 288. 14. E.g., S. Sandmel, The First Christian Century in Judaism and Christianity (New York: Oxford University, 1969) ch. 2 'Palestinian Judaisms'; J. Neusner et al., eds., Judaisms and Their Messiahs at the Turn of the Christian Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1987); J. Neusner, Studying Classical Judaism: A Primer (Louisville: Westminster, 1991) 27-36; A. F. Segal, The Other Judaisms of Late Antiquity (Atlanta: Scholars, 1987); J. Murphy, The Religious World of Jesus: An Introduction to Second Temple Palestinian Judaism (Hoboken, NJ: Ktav, 1991) 39. 'Whereas rabbinic Judaism is dominated by an identifiable perspective that holds together many otherwise diverse elements, early Judaism appears to encompass almost unlimited diversity and variety — indeed, it might be more appropriate to speak of early Judaisms' (R. A. Kraft and G. W. E. Nickelsburg, Early Judaism and Its Modern Interpreters [Atlanta: Scholars, 1986] 2). 257

§9.1 The Historical Context<br />

which flourished <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> heart of <strong>the</strong> land of Israel up to <strong>the</strong> 60s of <strong>the</strong> first century<br />

CE. This <strong>in</strong> turn has resulted <strong>in</strong> a renewed <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pseudepigrapha 1 ' and an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g recognition that <strong>the</strong>y too have to be described as represent<strong>in</strong>g different<br />

forms of Judaism. At <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>the</strong> extent of Pharisaic <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> firstcentury<br />

Israel has been radically questioned, 12 and <strong>the</strong> sharpness of any dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

between 'Judaism' and 'Hellenism' which had allowed a clear demarcation<br />

between 'Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Judaism' and 'Hellenistic Judaism' has been considerably<br />

blurred. 13 With<strong>in</strong> a broader framework we could perhaps also note that <strong>the</strong> liberal<br />

thrust of so much western scholarship, re<strong>in</strong>forced more recently by postmodern<br />

suspicion, has progressively underm<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> very idea of a 'norm'.<br />

In consequence <strong>the</strong> last two decades of <strong>the</strong> twentieth century witnessed an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g tendency to emphasize <strong>the</strong> diverse character of first-century Judaism<br />

and to speak of several 'Judaisms' (plural), leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong>ir legitimacy<br />

as forms of 'Judaism' unasked as be<strong>in</strong>g ei<strong>the</strong>r mislead<strong>in</strong>g or improper. 14<br />

Still too little explored, however, is <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r or alternative question how this<br />

quite proper modern, phenomenological description of different Judaisms relates<br />

to <strong>the</strong> self-perception of each of <strong>the</strong>se several Judaisms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own day, not to<br />

mention <strong>the</strong>ir own evaluation of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Judaisms.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> alternative option at this po<strong>in</strong>t for a historian of <strong>the</strong> period is to<br />

speak of 'Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Judaism'. It is true that <strong>the</strong> name 'Palest<strong>in</strong>e' came <strong>in</strong>to formal<br />

use for <strong>the</strong> territory only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second century CE, when, follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> failure<br />

of <strong>the</strong> second Jewish Re<strong>vol</strong>t (132-135), <strong>the</strong> Roman colony of Aelia<br />

Capitol<strong>in</strong>a was reestablished, and Judea was renamed Syria Palaest<strong>in</strong>a. But <strong>the</strong><br />

usage itself is very old and common among Greco-Roman writers. Herodotus <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fifth century BCE already speaks of '<strong>the</strong> Syrians of Palest<strong>in</strong>e' (Hist. II. 10.3),<br />

11. See particularly J. H. Charlesworth, ed., The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (2<br />

<strong>vol</strong>s.; London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1983, 1985) = OTP; also Charlesworth, <strong>Jesus</strong> ch. 2;<br />

H. F. D. Sparks, ed. The Apocryphal Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984).<br />

12. Differently by Neusner, Rabb<strong>in</strong>ic Traditions; also From Politics to Piety; and by<br />

Sanders, particularly Judaism: Practice and Belief, 63 BCE-66 CE (London: SCM, 1992) ch. 18.<br />

13. See chapter 5 n. 122; see also below n. 288.<br />

14. E.g., S. Sandmel, The First Christian Century <strong>in</strong> Judaism and <strong>Christianity</strong> (New<br />

York: Oxford University, 1969) ch. 2 'Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Judaisms'; J. Neusner et al., eds., Judaisms<br />

and Their Messiahs at <strong>the</strong> Turn of <strong>the</strong> Christian Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1987);<br />

J. Neusner, Study<strong>in</strong>g Classical Judaism: A Primer (Louisville: Westm<strong>in</strong>ster, 1991) 27-36; A. F.<br />

Segal, The O<strong>the</strong>r Judaisms of Late Antiquity (Atlanta: Scholars, 1987); J. Murphy, The Religious<br />

World of <strong>Jesus</strong>: An Introduction to Second Temple Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Judaism (Hoboken, NJ:<br />

Ktav, 1991) 39. 'Whereas rabb<strong>in</strong>ic Judaism is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by an identifiable perspective that<br />

holds toge<strong>the</strong>r many o<strong>the</strong>rwise diverse elements, early Judaism appears to encompass almost<br />

unlimited diversity and variety — <strong>in</strong>deed, it might be more appropriate to speak of early<br />

Judaisms' (R. A. Kraft and G. W. E. Nickelsburg, Early Judaism and Its Modern Interpreters<br />

[Atlanta: Scholars, 1986] 2).<br />

257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!