Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

FROM THE GOSPELS TO JESUS §8.1 Apocryphon of James (Cameron's main focus) was an attempt to manipulate a well-established and deeply rooted concern (to remember Jesus' teaching) by using it to commend a sayings tradition laced with 'secret' (Gnostic) elements. 40 In short, the witnessing and remembering motifs strengthen the impression that more or less from the first those who established new churches would have taken care to provide and build a foundation of Jesus tradition. Particularly important for Gentiles taking on a wholly new life-style and social identity would be guidelines and models for the different character of conduct now expected from them. Such guidelines and models were evidently provided by a solid basis of Jesus tradition which they were expected to remember, to take in and live out. d. Apostolic Custodians The idea of the 'apostles' as themselves the foundation of the church, or of the new Jerusalem, appears already in Eph. 2.20 and Rev. 21.14. More striking is the fact that a clear emphasis of the early chapters of Acts is the role of the apostles as ensuring continuity between what Jesus had taught and the expanding mission of the movement reinvigorated afresh at Pentecost. The implication of the opening words is that Acts is a continuation of 'all that Jesus began to do and teach' as recorded in 'the first part of his work', the Gospel of Luke (Acts 1.1). The instruction given to the apostles (1.2), the implication continues, had just the same continuity in view. 41 Hence, when the traitor Judas is replaced by a new twelfth apostle, the criterion for his election is that he should have been one of their number throughout the ministry of Jesus, 'beginning from the baptism of John' (1.21- 22). Hence also the emphasis in 2.42, where the first mark of the new post- Pentecost community is its continuation in and firm attachment to (proskartereo) 'the teaching of the apostles'. Such an emphasis might be regarded as a late perspective, when, arguably, continuity questions would have become (more) important. But there are indications that such continuity was seen as important from the first. These indications focus on the importance of Peter, James, and John to which our texts testify. They were evidently reckoned as the first men among the leaders of the initial Jerusalem community (Acts 1.13) — Peter certainly (1.15; 2.14; 5.1-10, 15, 29), 40. 'Now the twelve disciples [were] sitting all together at [the same time], and remembering what the Savior had said to each one of them, whether secretly or openly, they were setting it down in books' (Apoc. Jas. 2.1 Cameron). 41. More than any other Evangelist, Luke emphasizes the role of the disciples as 'apostles' (Luke 6.13; 9.10; 17.5; 22.14; 24.10). 180

FROM THE GOSPELS TO JESUS §8.1<br />

Apocryphon of James (Cameron's ma<strong>in</strong> focus) was an attempt to manipulate a<br />

well-established and deeply rooted concern (to remember <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g) by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

it to commend a say<strong>in</strong>gs tradition laced with 'secret' (Gnostic) elements. 40<br />

In short, <strong>the</strong> witness<strong>in</strong>g and remember<strong>in</strong>g motifs streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> impression<br />

that more or less from <strong>the</strong> first those who established new churches would<br />

have taken care to provide and build a foundation of <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition. Particularly<br />

important for Gentiles tak<strong>in</strong>g on a wholly new life-style and social identity<br />

would be guidel<strong>in</strong>es and models for <strong>the</strong> different character of conduct now expected<br />

from <strong>the</strong>m. Such guidel<strong>in</strong>es and models were evidently provided by a<br />

solid basis of <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition which <strong>the</strong>y were expected to remember, to take <strong>in</strong><br />

and live out.<br />

d. Apostolic Custodians<br />

The idea of <strong>the</strong> 'apostles' as <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>the</strong> foundation of <strong>the</strong> church, or of <strong>the</strong><br />

new Jerusalem, appears already <strong>in</strong> Eph. 2.20 and Rev. 21.14. More strik<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that a clear emphasis of <strong>the</strong> early chapters of Acts is <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> apostles<br />

as ensur<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uity between what <strong>Jesus</strong> had taught and <strong>the</strong> expand<strong>in</strong>g mission<br />

of <strong>the</strong> movement re<strong>in</strong>vigorated afresh at Pentecost. The implication of <strong>the</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

words is that Acts is a cont<strong>in</strong>uation of 'all that <strong>Jesus</strong> began to do and teach' as<br />

recorded <strong>in</strong> '<strong>the</strong> first part of his work', <strong>the</strong> Gospel of Luke (Acts 1.1). The <strong>in</strong>struction<br />

given to <strong>the</strong> apostles (1.2), <strong>the</strong> implication cont<strong>in</strong>ues, had just <strong>the</strong> same<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>in</strong> view. 41 Hence, when <strong>the</strong> traitor Judas is replaced by a new twelfth<br />

apostle, <strong>the</strong> criterion for his election is that he should have been one of <strong>the</strong>ir number<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>Jesus</strong>, 'beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> baptism of John' (1.21-<br />

22). Hence also <strong>the</strong> emphasis <strong>in</strong> 2.42, where <strong>the</strong> first mark of <strong>the</strong> new post-<br />

Pentecost community is its cont<strong>in</strong>uation <strong>in</strong> and firm attachment to (proskartereo)<br />

'<strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> apostles'.<br />

Such an emphasis might be regarded as a late perspective, when, arguably,<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uity questions would have become (more) important. But <strong>the</strong>re are <strong>in</strong>dications<br />

that such cont<strong>in</strong>uity was seen as important from <strong>the</strong> first. These <strong>in</strong>dications<br />

focus on <strong>the</strong> importance of Peter, James, and John to which our texts testify.<br />

They were evidently reckoned as <strong>the</strong> first men among <strong>the</strong> leaders of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial Jerusalem<br />

community (Acts 1.13) — Peter certa<strong>in</strong>ly (1.15; 2.14; 5.1-10, 15, 29),<br />

40. 'Now <strong>the</strong> twelve disciples [were] sitt<strong>in</strong>g all toge<strong>the</strong>r at [<strong>the</strong> same time], and remember<strong>in</strong>g<br />

what <strong>the</strong> Savior had said to each one of <strong>the</strong>m, whe<strong>the</strong>r secretly or openly, <strong>the</strong>y were sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

it down <strong>in</strong> books' (Apoc. Jas. 2.1 Cameron).<br />

41. More than any o<strong>the</strong>r Evangelist, Luke emphasizes <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> disciples as 'apostles'<br />

(Luke 6.13; 9.10; 17.5; 22.14; 24.10).<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!