09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§8.1 The Tradition<br />

traditions (2.8, 14), <strong>the</strong> first (2.8) echo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> (presumably well-known) formula<br />

with which Paul reassured <strong>the</strong> Roman believers regard<strong>in</strong>g his own gospel (Rom.<br />

1.3-4). 34 The importance of post-Easter believers remember<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Jesus</strong>' words is a<br />

repeated <strong>the</strong>me <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts and John; 35 <strong>the</strong> equivalence of John 14.26 and 15.27<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that 'remember<strong>in</strong>g all I have said to you', and 'witnesses with me from<br />

<strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g', are two sides of <strong>the</strong> same co<strong>in</strong>. 2 Peter confirms that remember<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g first given was a central concern <strong>in</strong> early <strong>Christianity</strong> (1.15; 3.2); similarly<br />

Rev. 3.3. 1 Clement uses <strong>the</strong> phrase 'remember(<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>the</strong> words of <strong>the</strong> Lord<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>' to <strong>in</strong>troduce a brief catena of <strong>Jesus</strong>' say<strong>in</strong>gs on two occasions (13.1-2; 46.7-<br />

8), as does Polycarp with a similar <strong>in</strong>troductory formula, 'remember<strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong><br />

Lord taught when he said' {Phil. 2.3). Here we should also simply note <strong>the</strong> famous<br />

Papias tradition, which repeatedly emphasises <strong>the</strong> importance of 'remember<strong>in</strong>g'<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmission of <strong>the</strong> earliest traditions stemm<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> first disciples<br />

(Eusebius, HE 3.39.3-4, 15; 6.14.6), and Just<strong>in</strong>'s concern to 'br<strong>in</strong>g to remembrance'<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Jesus</strong> (Dial. 18.1; 1 Apol. 14.4). 36<br />

Cameron argues that '<strong>the</strong> formulaic employment of this term ("remember<strong>in</strong>g")<br />

to <strong>in</strong>troduce collections of say<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Jesus</strong> is a practice which began with<br />

<strong>the</strong> relatively free production of say<strong>in</strong>gs traditions . . .'. 37 And it is certa<strong>in</strong>ly true<br />

that <strong>the</strong> motif <strong>in</strong>cludes some freedom <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmission of <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> view. 38<br />

But <strong>the</strong> idea of remember<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition is as early as our earliest references to<br />

such tradition (Paul). And it is notable that John, despite his freedom <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dialogues of <strong>Jesus</strong>, seems for <strong>the</strong> most part to have restricted <strong>the</strong> remember<strong>in</strong>g<br />

motif to say<strong>in</strong>gs which have clear Synoptic parallels, that is, which were well<br />

rooted <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition. 39 It is more likely, <strong>the</strong>n, that <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> motif <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

flections on 1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 11.23b-25', <strong>in</strong> B. F. Meyer, ed., One Loaf, One Cup: Ecumenical<br />

Studies of 1 Cor. 11 and O<strong>the</strong>r Eucharistie Texts (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University, 1993) 75-115<br />

(here 103-11); W. Schräge, Der erste Brief an die Kor<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>r (EKK VII, 4 <strong>vol</strong>s.; Zürich:<br />

Benziger, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2001) 3.41-42.<br />

34. For more detail see my Romans (WBC 38; Dallas: Word, 1988) 5-6.<br />

35. Luke 24.6, 8; Acts 11.16; 20.35; John 2.22; 12.16; 14.26; 15.20; 16.4.<br />

36. As is well known, Just<strong>in</strong> called <strong>the</strong> Gospels 'memoirs, recollections<br />

(apomnemoneumata)' of <strong>the</strong> apostles (1 Apol. 66.3; Dial. 100.4). The po<strong>in</strong>t was properly emphasized<br />

<strong>in</strong> a neglected essay by N. A. Dahl, 'Anamnesis: Memory and Commemoration <strong>in</strong><br />

Early <strong>Christianity</strong>' (1946), <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Memory of <strong>the</strong> Early Church (M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Augsburg,<br />

1976) 11-29.<br />

37. Say<strong>in</strong>gs Traditions ch. 3 (here 112).<br />

38. Cf. Koester, Ancient Christian Gospels 70. But Cameron also notes Polycarp's 'tendency<br />

to br<strong>in</strong>g such collections <strong>in</strong>to conformity with <strong>the</strong> written gospels of his church' (Say<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Traditions 113); or, once aga<strong>in</strong>, is it ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> case that <strong>the</strong> tradition was known <strong>in</strong> variant<br />

forms?<br />

39. John 2.19-22 (Mark 14.58 par.); John 12.14-16 (Mark 11.1-10 pars.); John 15.20<br />

(Matt. 10.24-25); <strong>the</strong> only exception is John 16.4.<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!