Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§8.1 The Tradition long accustomed to being able to rely on textbooks, encyclopaedias, and other reference works. But an ancient oral society had few if any such resources and had to rely instead on individuals whose role in their community was to function as what Jan Vansina describes as 'a walking reference library'. 21 Nor should it be forgotten that, at least according to the tradition, Jesus himself was regarded as a 'teacher' (didaskalos), 22 and was so regarded by his disciples. 23 Jesus may even have regarded himself as such (Matt. 10.24-25/Luke 6.40). That the disciples of Jesus are consistently called 'disciples', that is 'those taught, learners' (Hebrew talmidim; Greek mathetai) — should also be included. 24 The relation between Jesus and his disciples was remembered as one between teacher and taught, with the implication that, as such, the disciples understood themselves to be committed to remember their teacher's teaching. 25 c. Witnessing and Remembering Two important motifs in the NT also confirm the importance for the first Christians of retelling the story of Jesus and of taking steps actively to recall what Jesus said and did. One is the motif of 'bearing witness'. The motif is particularly prominent in Acts and John. In Acts it is stressed that the role of the first disciples (or apostles in particular) was to be 'witnesses' (martyres) of Jesus (1.8). Particularly in mind were the events of Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection (2.32; 3.15; 5.32; 10.41; 13.31). 26 But it is clear from 1.22 and 10.37-39 that Luke understood the witnessing to include Jesus' ministry 'beginning from the baptism of John'. Paul preeminently is presented as a 'witness' of Jesus (22.15, 18; 23.11; 26.16). In John's Gospel the importance of witness-bearing to Jesus is equally stressed. 21. J. Vansina, Oral Tradition as History (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1985) 37. 22. Mark 5.35/Luke 8.49; Mark 9.17/Luke 9.38; Mark 10.17/Matt. 19.16/Luke 18.18; Mark 10.20; Mark 12.14, 19, 32/Matt. 22.16, 24, 36/Luke 20.21, 28, 39; Matt. 8.19; 9.11; 12.38; 17.24; Luke 7.40; 10.25; 11.45; 12.13; 19.39. 23. Mark 4.38; 9.38; 10.35; 13.1/Luke 21.7; Mark 14.14/Matt. 26.18/Luke 22.11; though it is noticeable that Matthew and Luke seem to have avoided the term (for the most part) on the lips of the disciples, presumably as not being sufficiently exalted. 24. Mathetes ('disciple') is used frequently in the Gospels — Matthew 73, Mark 46, Luke 37, John 78. 25. R. Riesner, Jesus als Lehrer (WUNT 2.7; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1981) has particularly emphasized this feature of the tradition (particularly 246-66, 357-79, 408-53); also 'Jesus as Preacher and Teacher', in Wansbrough, ed., Jesus and the Oral Gospel Tradition 185- 210. See further below §15.8. 26. The implication of 1 Cor. 15.6 is that most of the 'more than five hundred' to whom Jesus had appeared were still alive, and thus able to confirm the witness of the kerygma. 177

§8.1 The Tradition<br />

long accustomed to be<strong>in</strong>g able to rely on textbooks, encyclopaedias, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reference works. But an ancient oral society had few if any such resources and<br />

had to rely <strong>in</strong>stead on <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir community was to function<br />

as what Jan Vans<strong>in</strong>a describes as 'a walk<strong>in</strong>g reference library'. 21<br />

Nor should it be forgotten that, at least accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> tradition, <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

himself was regarded as a 'teacher' (didaskalos), 22 and was so regarded by his<br />

disciples. 23 <strong>Jesus</strong> may even have regarded himself as such (Matt. 10.24-25/Luke<br />

6.40). That <strong>the</strong> disciples of <strong>Jesus</strong> are consistently called 'disciples', that is 'those<br />

taught, learners' (Hebrew talmidim; Greek ma<strong>the</strong>tai) — should also be <strong>in</strong>cluded.<br />

24 The relation between <strong>Jesus</strong> and his disciples was remembered as one<br />

between teacher and taught, with <strong>the</strong> implication that, as such, <strong>the</strong> disciples understood<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves to be committed to remember <strong>the</strong>ir teacher's teach<strong>in</strong>g. 25<br />

c. Witness<strong>in</strong>g and Remember<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Two important motifs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NT also confirm <strong>the</strong> importance for <strong>the</strong> first Christians<br />

of retell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> story of <strong>Jesus</strong> and of tak<strong>in</strong>g steps actively to recall what <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

said and did.<br />

One is <strong>the</strong> motif of 'bear<strong>in</strong>g witness'. The motif is particularly prom<strong>in</strong>ent<br />

<strong>in</strong> Acts and John. In Acts it is stressed that <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> first disciples (or apostles<br />

<strong>in</strong> particular) was to be 'witnesses' (martyres) of <strong>Jesus</strong> (1.8). Particularly <strong>in</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>d were <strong>the</strong> events of <strong>Jesus</strong>' crucifixion and resurrection (2.32; 3.15; 5.32;<br />

10.41; 13.31). 26 But it is clear from 1.22 and 10.37-39 that Luke understood <strong>the</strong><br />

witness<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>Jesus</strong>' m<strong>in</strong>istry 'beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> baptism of John'. Paul<br />

preem<strong>in</strong>ently is presented as a 'witness' of <strong>Jesus</strong> (22.15, 18; 23.11; 26.16). In<br />

John's Gospel <strong>the</strong> importance of witness-bear<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Jesus</strong> is equally stressed.<br />

21. J. Vans<strong>in</strong>a, Oral Tradition as History (Madison: University of Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, 1985) 37.<br />

22. Mark 5.35/Luke 8.49; Mark 9.17/Luke 9.38; Mark 10.17/Matt. 19.16/Luke 18.18;<br />

Mark 10.20; Mark 12.14, 19, 32/Matt. 22.16, 24, 36/Luke 20.21, 28, 39; Matt. 8.19; 9.11;<br />

12.38; 17.24; Luke 7.40; 10.25; 11.45; 12.13; 19.39.<br />

23. Mark 4.38; 9.38; 10.35; 13.1/Luke 21.7; Mark 14.14/Matt. 26.18/Luke 22.11;<br />

though it is noticeable that Mat<strong>the</strong>w and Luke seem to have avoided <strong>the</strong> term (for <strong>the</strong> most part)<br />

on <strong>the</strong> lips of <strong>the</strong> disciples, presumably as not be<strong>in</strong>g sufficiently exalted.<br />

24. Ma<strong>the</strong>tes ('disciple') is used frequently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospels — Mat<strong>the</strong>w 73, Mark 46,<br />

Luke 37, John 78.<br />

25. R. Riesner, <strong>Jesus</strong> als Lehrer (WUNT 2.7; Tüb<strong>in</strong>gen: Mohr Siebeck, 1981) has particularly<br />

emphasized this feature of <strong>the</strong> tradition (particularly 246-66, 357-79, 408-53); also<br />

'<strong>Jesus</strong> as Preacher and Teacher', <strong>in</strong> Wansbrough, ed., <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Oral Gospel Tradition 185-<br />

210. See fur<strong>the</strong>r below §15.8.<br />

26. The implication of 1 Cor. 15.6 is that most of <strong>the</strong> 'more than five hundred' to whom<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> had appeared were still alive, and thus able to confirm <strong>the</strong> witness of <strong>the</strong> kerygma.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!