09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PREFACE<br />

revisions of <strong>the</strong> lecture material meant that <strong>the</strong> third section of 'Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs' cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

to f<strong>in</strong>d itself restricted to two or three brief sketches.<br />

The situation changed significantly with my move to <strong>the</strong> University of<br />

Durham <strong>in</strong> 1982, where I <strong>in</strong>herited a core NT course on 'New Testament Theology'.<br />

Faced by a similar challenge of too much material to cover <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

course, I had no doubt that <strong>the</strong> course should focus on <strong>the</strong> two NT figures of<br />

greatest <strong>the</strong>ological significance — <strong>Jesus</strong> and Paul. It seemed obvious to me<br />

<strong>the</strong>n, and still seems obvious to me, that <strong>in</strong> a Department focus<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> Jewish<br />

and Christian traditions of <strong>the</strong>ologiz<strong>in</strong>g, detailed historical treatment of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />

focus of all Christian <strong>the</strong>ology (<strong>Jesus</strong>) was <strong>in</strong>dispensable. Similarly <strong>in</strong> regard<br />

to Paul, arguably <strong>the</strong> first and most <strong>in</strong>fluential of all Christian <strong>the</strong>ologians<br />

(by virtue of <strong>the</strong> canonization of his letters): how could a course <strong>in</strong> New Testament<br />

Theology not give equivalently detailed treatment of Paul's <strong>the</strong>ology? And<br />

so my earlier material was reworked to sharpen <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological focus (already a<br />

central concern of <strong>the</strong> earlier course anyway) and to concentrate solely on <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

and Paul. In a larger Department it was always possible to offer various options<br />

which advanced my cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second generation of <strong>Christianity</strong><br />

and <strong>the</strong> transition to <strong>the</strong> so-called 'sub-apostolic' age.<br />

This latter <strong>in</strong>terest came to <strong>in</strong>itial fruition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Durham-Tub<strong>in</strong>gen research<br />

sem<strong>in</strong>ar on 'The Part<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Ways, AD 70 to 135', <strong>in</strong> September 1989,<br />

appropriately on <strong>the</strong> centenary of <strong>the</strong> death of my great hero, J. B. Lightfoot. The<br />

papers were subsequently published (1992) under <strong>the</strong> title Jews and Christians,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al title of <strong>the</strong> Symposium as <strong>the</strong> book's subtitle. There was also <strong>the</strong><br />

lecture series which I gave <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gregorian Pontifical University (Rome) <strong>in</strong> 1990<br />

as Joseph McCarthy Visit<strong>in</strong>g Professor, which was published <strong>in</strong> fuller version as<br />

The Part<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Ways between <strong>Christianity</strong> and Judaism <strong>in</strong> 1991. But <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

meantime <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology of Paul had become such a major concern that fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

work towards <strong>the</strong> fulfilment of my orig<strong>in</strong>al vision had to be put on hold until I<br />

had got Paul out of my system. That time duly arrived, with <strong>the</strong> publication of my<br />

The Theology of Paul <strong>the</strong> Apostle <strong>in</strong> 1998. At which po<strong>in</strong>t, as I delighted to tease<br />

my friends, 'I gave up Paul for <strong>Jesus</strong>'.<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g focused my attention so heavily on Paul for nearly twenty years I had no<br />

delusions as to <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong> before me. Even though I had<br />

kept fairly well abreast of <strong>Jesus</strong> and Gospels scholarship dur<strong>in</strong>g that period I<br />

knew well enough that <strong>the</strong> shift of research <strong>in</strong>terest from Paul to <strong>Jesus</strong> demanded<br />

a massive re-tool<strong>in</strong>g job on my part. Fortunately I was granted by <strong>the</strong><br />

University <strong>in</strong> effect two years research leave, first as a Derman Christopherson<br />

Fellow (1999-2000), and <strong>the</strong>n as my regular research leave enhanced <strong>in</strong> recognition<br />

of my (second) spell of three years service as Head of <strong>the</strong> Department. I<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued my postgraduate supervisions (almost always a delight and stimulus)<br />

but o<strong>the</strong>rwise was freed from academic duties as a member of <strong>the</strong> Department. I<br />

xiv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!