Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§6.4 History, Hermeneutics and Faith ism'), while also fully acknowledging that the only access we have to this reality lies along the spiralling path of appropriate dialogue or conversation between the knower and the thing known (hence 'critical'). 47 The historians Appleby, Hunt, and Jacob argue in similar terms for 'practical realism' as 'an interactive relationship between an inquiring subject and an external object', 48 a 'qualified objectivity . . . disentangled from the scientific model of objectivity'. They concede the impossibility of neutral research but maintain 'the viability of stable bodies of knowledge that can be communicated, built upon, and subjected to testing'. 49 I align myself with the basic thrust of Lonergan's epistemology and its application to history. Even the data themselves are never 'raw': they have already been 'selected' by the historical process; they are 'selected' again by the way they have been discovered and brought to present notice; they come with a context, or various contexts already predisposing interpretation; the interpreter's framework of understanding or particular thesis causes certain data to appear more significant than others; and so on. But all that being said, there is an otherness, an 'over-against-us' character to the data, and also to the events to which they bear witness. And the task of seeking to describe and evaluate the data and to reach some sort of judgment regarding the facts, which is not merely subjective but may command proper critical respect, is not only viable, but in the case of the great event(s) of Jesus necessary. In particular, the model of historical study as a dialogue between present and past, between historian and history, is one which has always appealed to me, not least because it recognizes that the historian not only asks the questions, but, in genuine engagement with the subject matter, often finds him/herself put in question. In what follows, therefore, I will attempt to practise the historian's art somewhat on the model of 'critical realism'. All this becomes still more relevant when the subject matter is mediated to us primarily through historical texts. 6.4. Hermeneutical Principles The 'linguistic turn' of postmodernism has refocused the historian's task on 'text' rather than 'event'. Besides which, any attempt to recover the historical figure of Jesus is more or less exclusively a matter of dealing with ancient texts. So questions about history elide almost imperceptibly into questions about interpre- 47. Wright, The New Testament and the People of God 31-46 (here 35 — Wright's emphasis). 48. Telling the Truth 251, 254, 259, 285. 49. Telling the Truth 254-61 (here 254). 111

§6.4 History, Hermeneutics and Faith<br />

ism'), while also fully acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> only access we have to this reality<br />

lies along <strong>the</strong> spirall<strong>in</strong>g path of appropriate dialogue or conversation<br />

between <strong>the</strong> knower and <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>g known (hence 'critical'). 47<br />

The historians Appleby, Hunt, and Jacob argue <strong>in</strong> similar terms for 'practical realism'<br />

as 'an <strong>in</strong>teractive relationship between an <strong>in</strong>quir<strong>in</strong>g subject and an external<br />

object', 48 a 'qualified objectivity . . . disentangled from <strong>the</strong> scientific model<br />

of objectivity'. They concede <strong>the</strong> impossibility of neutral research but ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />

'<strong>the</strong> viability of stable bodies of knowledge that can be communicated, built<br />

upon, and subjected to test<strong>in</strong>g'. 49<br />

I align myself with <strong>the</strong> basic thrust of Lonergan's epistemology and its application<br />

to history. Even <strong>the</strong> data <strong>the</strong>mselves are never 'raw': <strong>the</strong>y have already<br />

been 'selected' by <strong>the</strong> historical process; <strong>the</strong>y are 'selected' aga<strong>in</strong> by <strong>the</strong> way<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have been discovered and brought to present notice; <strong>the</strong>y come with a context,<br />

or various contexts already predispos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpretation; <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpreter's<br />

framework of understand<strong>in</strong>g or particular <strong>the</strong>sis causes certa<strong>in</strong> data to appear<br />

more significant than o<strong>the</strong>rs; and so on. But all that be<strong>in</strong>g said, <strong>the</strong>re is an o<strong>the</strong>rness,<br />

an 'over-aga<strong>in</strong>st-us' character to <strong>the</strong> data, and also to <strong>the</strong> events to which<br />

<strong>the</strong>y bear witness. And <strong>the</strong> task of seek<strong>in</strong>g to describe and evaluate <strong>the</strong> data and<br />

to reach some sort of judgment regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> facts, which is not merely subjective<br />

but may command proper critical respect, is not only viable, but <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case<br />

of <strong>the</strong> great event(s) of <strong>Jesus</strong> necessary. In particular, <strong>the</strong> model of historical<br />

study as a dialogue between present and past, between historian and history, is<br />

one which has always appealed to me, not least because it recognizes that <strong>the</strong> historian<br />

not only asks <strong>the</strong> questions, but, <strong>in</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>e engagement with <strong>the</strong> subject<br />

matter, often f<strong>in</strong>ds him/herself put <strong>in</strong> question. In what follows, <strong>the</strong>refore, I will<br />

attempt to practise <strong>the</strong> historian's art somewhat on <strong>the</strong> model of 'critical realism'.<br />

All this becomes still more relevant when <strong>the</strong> subject matter is mediated to<br />

us primarily through historical texts.<br />

6.4. Hermeneutical Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

The 'l<strong>in</strong>guistic turn' of postmodernism has refocused <strong>the</strong> historian's task on<br />

'text' ra<strong>the</strong>r than 'event'. Besides which, any attempt to recover <strong>the</strong> historical figure<br />

of <strong>Jesus</strong> is more or less exclusively a matter of deal<strong>in</strong>g with ancient texts. So<br />

questions about history elide almost imperceptibly <strong>in</strong>to questions about <strong>in</strong>terpre-<br />

47. Wright, The New Testament and <strong>the</strong> People of God 31-46 (here 35 — Wright's emphasis).<br />

48. Tell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Truth 251, 254, 259, 285.<br />

49. Tell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Truth 254-61 (here 254).<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!