Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §18.4 riences are enshrined, as with the earlier impact made by Jesus' teaching and actions, in the traditions which have come down to us. The 'third day' tradition is more problematic. For if it was initially formulated in relation to the resurrection appearances, 166 that runs quite counter to the strong tradition of resurrection appearances first in Galilee (Mark), or first at least to the male disciples (Matthew). To reach Galilee from Jerusalem took far longer than three days. Perhaps, then, it emerged from the memory of appearances in and around Jerusalem on the evening of the first Sunday (Luke, John). Or should we give more weight to the fact that it is the empty tomb tradition which consistently includes in its core the time note, 'on the first day of the week', whereas the Jerusalem appearance traditions simply take up from the stories of the empty tomb, or speak of '(the evening of) the same day'? 167 The empty tomb traditions also include proclamation of Jesus' resurrection, so the conclusion, 'raised on the third day', could have been early drawn and become part of the first confessional affirmation from the first. In short, although the enduring forms of the resurrection appearance traditions give minimal evidence of a core spine elaborated in the subsequent performances still available to us, we can nevertheless speak of a core tradition evident within and through the diversity of these traditions. c. The Silences of the Tradition But we have still to take account of what in many ways is the most striking and astonishing feature of all — that is, the absence of accounts of appearances to Peter and to James (brother of Jesus). On almost any reckoning, these must have been regarded as the most significant of the appearances for the initial band of disciples. Peter evidently soon began to function as the initial leader of the Jerusalem church (Acts 3-5), to be succeeded by James (brother of Jesus) 168 when Peter probably began to embark on a wider outreach. 169 The appearance to Peter 166. Hahn, Hoheitstitel 205-206 (Titles 180). But this common deduction is usually predicated on the prior assumption that it was the appearances alone which gave rise to the conviction that Jesus had been raised from the dead (e.g., Bultmann, Theology 1.45; Grass, Ostergeschehen 184). 167. Bode deduces from the absence of a more explicit 'third day' motif in the empty tomb traditions that they were formulated early, before the motif became influential (First Easter Morning 124-26, 161-62); similarly Wilckens, Resurrection 10-11; Hengel, 'Begrabnis' 132-33 n. 51. 168. No one doubts that the James of 1 Cor. 15.7 is the James of Gal. 1.19 and 2.9, 12. 169. See particularly Gal. 2.7-9. Acts 12.1-17 suggests that Peter also had to leave Jerusalem for his own safety. The subject is another to which we shall have to return in vol. 2. 862

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §18.4<br />

riences are enshr<strong>in</strong>ed, as with <strong>the</strong> earlier impact made by <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g and actions,<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditions which have come down to us.<br />

The 'third day' tradition is more problematic. For if it was <strong>in</strong>itially formulated<br />

<strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> resurrection appearances, 166 that runs quite counter to <strong>the</strong><br />

strong tradition of resurrection appearances first <strong>in</strong> Galilee (Mark), or first at<br />

least to <strong>the</strong> male disciples (Mat<strong>the</strong>w). To reach Galilee from Jerusalem took far<br />

longer than three days. Perhaps, <strong>the</strong>n, it emerged from <strong>the</strong> memory of appearances<br />

<strong>in</strong> and around Jerusalem on <strong>the</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> first Sunday (Luke, John).<br />

Or should we give more weight to <strong>the</strong> fact that it is <strong>the</strong> empty tomb tradition<br />

which consistently <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong> its core <strong>the</strong> time note, 'on <strong>the</strong> first day of <strong>the</strong><br />

week', whereas <strong>the</strong> Jerusalem appearance traditions simply take up from <strong>the</strong> stories<br />

of <strong>the</strong> empty tomb, or speak of '(<strong>the</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g of) <strong>the</strong> same day'? 167 The<br />

empty tomb traditions also <strong>in</strong>clude proclamation of <strong>Jesus</strong>' resurrection, so <strong>the</strong><br />

conclusion, 'raised on <strong>the</strong> third day', could have been early drawn and become<br />

part of <strong>the</strong> first confessional affirmation from <strong>the</strong> first.<br />

In short, although <strong>the</strong> endur<strong>in</strong>g forms of <strong>the</strong> resurrection appearance traditions<br />

give m<strong>in</strong>imal evidence of a core sp<strong>in</strong>e elaborated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent performances<br />

still available to us, we can never<strong>the</strong>less speak of a core tradition evident<br />

with<strong>in</strong> and through <strong>the</strong> diversity of <strong>the</strong>se traditions.<br />

c. The Silences of <strong>the</strong> Tradition<br />

But we have still to take account of what <strong>in</strong> many ways is <strong>the</strong> most strik<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

astonish<strong>in</strong>g feature of all — that is, <strong>the</strong> absence of accounts of appearances to Peter<br />

and to James (bro<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>Jesus</strong>). On almost any reckon<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>se must have<br />

been regarded as <strong>the</strong> most significant of <strong>the</strong> appearances for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial band of<br />

disciples. Peter evidently soon began to function as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial leader of <strong>the</strong> Jerusalem<br />

church (Acts 3-5), to be succeeded by James (bro<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>Jesus</strong>) 168 when<br />

Peter probably began to embark on a wider outreach. 169 The appearance to Peter<br />

166. Hahn, Hoheitstitel 205-206 (Titles 180). But this common deduction is usually<br />

predicated on <strong>the</strong> prior assumption that it was <strong>the</strong> appearances alone which gave rise to <strong>the</strong> conviction<br />

that <strong>Jesus</strong> had been raised from <strong>the</strong> dead (e.g., Bultmann, Theology 1.45; Grass,<br />

Ostergeschehen 184).<br />

167. Bode deduces from <strong>the</strong> absence of a more explicit 'third day' motif <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> empty<br />

tomb traditions that <strong>the</strong>y were formulated early, before <strong>the</strong> motif became <strong>in</strong>fluential (First<br />

Easter Morn<strong>in</strong>g 124-26, 161-62); similarly Wilckens, Resurrection 10-11; Hengel, 'Begrabnis'<br />

132-33 n. 51.<br />

168. No one doubts that <strong>the</strong> James of 1 Cor. 15.7 is <strong>the</strong> James of Gal. 1.19 and 2.9, 12.<br />

169. See particularly Gal. 2.7-9. Acts 12.1-17 suggests that Peter also had to leave Jerusalem<br />

for his own safety. The subject is ano<strong>the</strong>r to which we shall have to return <strong>in</strong> <strong>vol</strong>. 2.<br />

862

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!