09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §18.4<br />

<strong>the</strong> diversity is beyond anyth<strong>in</strong>g we have so far encountered — except <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

accounts of Judas's death (Matt. 27.3-10/Acts 1.16-19), where <strong>the</strong> lack of agreement<br />

signals, if anyth<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> relative lack of importance of <strong>the</strong> tradition for <strong>the</strong><br />

early Christian communities! In contrast, I started by not<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> several accounts<br />

of <strong>the</strong> appearance to Paul, which all occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same writ<strong>in</strong>g (Acts), provide<br />

a good example of what has proved to be <strong>the</strong> typical tradition<strong>in</strong>g process for<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition (§8.4a). But <strong>the</strong>y strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g are not part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition.<br />

Whereas <strong>the</strong> appearances to <strong>the</strong> twelve/eleven are <strong>the</strong> conclusion to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> tradition accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> unanimous voice of <strong>the</strong> canonical Gospels.<br />

Should we <strong>the</strong>n conclude that <strong>the</strong>y too were unimportant for <strong>the</strong> early communities<br />

of <strong>Jesus</strong>' disciples?!<br />

(4) Equally baffl<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> tension between appearances on earth and appearances<br />

from heaven. How could <strong>the</strong> appearance to Paul have proved so acceptable<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Jerusalem leadership if what was clearly perceived as an appearance<br />

from heaven was exceptional? Or does <strong>the</strong> ambiguity of <strong>the</strong> Matt. 28.16-20<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate some confused perception on <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t? 143 And we do not know what<br />

'category' o<strong>the</strong>r appearances (to <strong>the</strong> 500-plus, to 'all <strong>the</strong> apostles') fell <strong>in</strong>to. Is<br />

<strong>the</strong>re room, <strong>the</strong>refore, for an argument such as that of Peter Carnley, that all <strong>the</strong><br />

early appearances were actually 'from heaven'? 144<br />

There is no question, <strong>the</strong>n, as to <strong>the</strong> diversity of <strong>the</strong> traditions at this po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

The more important question, however, is whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> differences are out of<br />

character with a tradition<strong>in</strong>g process which took for granted variability among<br />

performances. 145 Which raises <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r question whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> obvious conclusion<br />

that <strong>the</strong> traditions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir present forms are unharmonizable has paid sufficient<br />

attention to <strong>the</strong> character of <strong>the</strong> tradition and of <strong>the</strong> tradition<strong>in</strong>g process. 146<br />

b. A Core Tradition?<br />

In po<strong>in</strong>t of fact, however, a number of common elements are readily discernible<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> appearance traditions which span a considerable portion of <strong>the</strong>ir diversity.<br />

143. See above at n. 120.<br />

144. Carnley, Structure 236-41: '<strong>the</strong> entire thrust of <strong>the</strong> evidence is towards <strong>the</strong> view that<br />

whatever was "seen" appeared "from heaven"' (242-43).<br />

145. When Evans observes that 'It is hardly <strong>the</strong> same Lord who speaks. In Mat<strong>the</strong>w it is<br />

evidently a Mat<strong>the</strong>an Lord who speaks, <strong>in</strong> Luke a Lukan Lord and <strong>in</strong> John a Johann<strong>in</strong>e Lord'<br />

{Resurrection 67), is he do<strong>in</strong>g more than simply observ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> characteristic features of<br />

performative variation?<br />

146. It is equally unsatisfactory for Craig simply to argue that '<strong>the</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g presence<br />

of liv<strong>in</strong>g eyewitnesses would retard significant accrual of legend' (Assess<strong>in</strong>g 387). What is required,<br />

and what I try to provide, is a cogent account of <strong>the</strong> tradition<strong>in</strong>g process itself.<br />

858

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!