09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §18.3<br />

however we should note <strong>the</strong> way Luke describes <strong>Jesus</strong>' <strong>in</strong><strong>vol</strong>vement with '<strong>the</strong><br />

apostles' <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> days follow<strong>in</strong>g his resurrection.<br />

3 After his suffer<strong>in</strong>g he presented himself alive (zönta) to <strong>the</strong>m by many conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g<br />

proofs (tekmeriois), appear<strong>in</strong>g (optanomenos) to <strong>the</strong>m dur<strong>in</strong>g forty<br />

days and speak<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God. 4 While eat<strong>in</strong>g (synalizomenos)<br />

with <strong>the</strong>m, he ordered <strong>the</strong>m not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait <strong>the</strong>re<br />

for <strong>the</strong> promise of <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Three features deserve comment here. (1) Luke describes <strong>Jesus</strong> simply as 'alive',<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than 'risen'. This is no doubt a variation of <strong>the</strong> 'raised' formula (Luke 24.7,<br />

46), but it is a dist<strong>in</strong>ctively Lukan emphasis (Luke 24.5, 23) and probably reflects<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> earliest reactions of all: that <strong>Jesus</strong> (who had died) was alive (aga<strong>in</strong>)!<br />

(2) By speak<strong>in</strong>g of tekmeria, [ 1 x Luke is press<strong>in</strong>g his belief <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tangibility of <strong>the</strong><br />

resurrection appearances (Luke 24.39), 112 but <strong>the</strong> term presumably <strong>in</strong>dicates his<br />

own response to those who questioned <strong>the</strong> Christian claims regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Jesus</strong>' resurrection<br />

(cf. Acts 17.32). (3) Most <strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> use of synalizö <strong>in</strong> 1.4. It means<br />

literally to 'eat salt (hals) with', and so to 'eat at <strong>the</strong> same table with, share tablefellowship<br />

with'. 113 Luke here extends his table-fellowship motif, 114 possibly<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> as part of <strong>the</strong> 'conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g proofs' (aga<strong>in</strong> Luke 24.39). In context <strong>the</strong> implication<br />

is almost of a cont<strong>in</strong>uous period — a forty-day-long resurrection appearance!<br />

115 Would Luke have denied this? Probably so, <strong>in</strong> view of Luke 24.31. But he<br />

has made no effort to avoid giv<strong>in</strong>g that impression. There is a confus<strong>in</strong>g mix here<br />

of far-reach<strong>in</strong>g claim and imprecise formulation, ra<strong>the</strong>r as <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w's two resurrection<br />

appearances (Matt. 28.9-10, 16-17), which probably reflects <strong>the</strong> vagueness<br />

of traditional memory ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> writers' deliberate choice.<br />

(8) Appearances <strong>in</strong> Galilee — Mark 16.7; Matt. 28.16-20; John 21.1-23.<br />

Matt. 28.16-20 John 21.1-14<br />

16 Now <strong>the</strong> eleven<br />

disciples went to<br />

Galilee, to <strong>the</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong><br />

to which <strong>Jesus</strong> had<br />

directed <strong>the</strong>m. 17<br />

When <strong>the</strong>y saw him,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y worshiped him;<br />

1 After <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>Jesus</strong> showed himself aga<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong> disciples by <strong>the</strong> Sea<br />

of Tiberias; and he showed himself <strong>in</strong> this way. 2 Ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>the</strong>re toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

were Simon Peter, Thomas called <strong>the</strong> Tw<strong>in</strong>, Nathanael of Cana <strong>in</strong> Galilee,<br />

<strong>the</strong> sons of Zebedee, and two o<strong>the</strong>rs of his disciples. 3 Simon Peter said to<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, 'I am go<strong>in</strong>g fish<strong>in</strong>g'. They said to him, 'We will go with you'. They<br />

went out and got <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> boat, but that night <strong>the</strong>y caught noth<strong>in</strong>g. 4 Just<br />

after daybreak, <strong>Jesus</strong> stood on <strong>the</strong> shore; but <strong>the</strong> disciples did not know that<br />

111. Tekmerion: 'that which causes someth<strong>in</strong>g to be known <strong>in</strong> a conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g and decisive<br />

manner' (BDAG, tekmerion); 'necessary proofs . . . lead<strong>in</strong>g to certa<strong>in</strong> conclusions' (Barrett,<br />

Acts 1.70).<br />

112. See above, n. 99.<br />

113. BDAG, synalizö 1; <strong>the</strong> text makes sense enough, so <strong>the</strong>re is no need to hypo<strong>the</strong>size<br />

a variant spell<strong>in</strong>g of synaulizö ('stay with'), as <strong>in</strong> NRSV (see Barrett, Acts 1.71-72).<br />

114. See aga<strong>in</strong> above, § 14.8a.<br />

115. Grass, Ostergeschehen 48-49.<br />

852

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!