Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §18.3 more typical Synoptic parallel is also significant, since the Synoptic and Johannine traditions come so close only rarely. The core has been elaborated by each Evangelist in their typical ways. Luke stresses the materiality of Jesus' risen body (24.39, 43);" he continues the fulfilled prophecy motif (24.44-46); 100 he foreshadows the theme of a witness 'beginning from Jerusalem' (24.47-48); 101 and he gives the first clear indication that, so far as he was concerned, the disciples never stirred from Jerusalem (24.49). 102 John continues his negative portrayal of 'the Jews' (20.19); 103 he strengthens the 'peace' motif (20.19, 21); 104 and he compresses into this first appearance to the chief disciples his own equivalent both of the Pentecostal commissioning (20.21-22) 105 and of ecclesiastical authorization (20.23). 106 Here then we probably can speak of a tradition told and retold in the early Christian communities; we have it only in two well-developed versions and one credal formula (1 Cor. 15.5). The fact that what was thereby recalled was a group experience rather than that of an individual is presumably significant. This was church tradition from the first, having been given its still visible spine, presumably, from the participants' talking about it among themselves. 107 99. Luke makes a point of stressing the tangibility of divine action within the everyday world: the dove at Jordan 'in bodily form' (Luke 3.22), the witness of the transfiguration not a dream (9.32), the 'many convincing proofs' of the resurrection (Acts 1.3), the angel who released Peter from prison real and not a vision (12.9), the Spirit's coming evidenced by visible and audible phenomena (2.4, 6, 33; 4.31; 8.17-18; 10.45-46; 19.6), and so on (see further my Unity and Diversity 180-84). 100. See above, n. 88. 101. See above, §8.1c. 102. For the centrality of Jerusalem as the point of continuity with Israel's history and fountainhead of the Christian mission, see below, vol. 2. 103. The negative role attributed to 'the Jews' is a feature of the Fourth Gospel; see, e.g., several essays in R. Bieringer, et al., eds., Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel: Papers of the Leuven Colloquium, 2000 (Assen: Van Gorcum, 2001), and further below, vol. 3. 104. The triple greeting 'Peace be with you' in the resurrection narratives (20.19, 21, 26), is clearly intended to hark back to the farewell bestowal of peace in 14.27 (also 16.33). 105. John 20.22 is traditionally called 'the Johannine Pentecost', and can indeed be regarded as John's theological compression of the Pentecost tradition (Acts 2) into the single complex of Jesus' death and resurrection/ascension (cf. 19.30). Note also the deliberate use of emphysaö ('breathe'), in obvious echo of the LXX Gen. 2.7 (already echoed in Ezek. 37.9 and Wis. 15.11); this is new creation. See further my Baptism 173-82. 106. John 20.23 is closer to Matt. 16.19 and 18.18 than to Luke 24.47 (see further Brown, John 1039-45). 107. I press the point against those who argue too glibly from the fact that the earliest tradition is confession of resurrection appearances (1 Cor. 15.5-8) and conclude that there were no narratives of resurrection appearances in the beginning (e.g., Wilckens, 'Tradition-History' 73-75). One form (kerygmatic confession) does not exclude another (narrative). It is much 850

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §18.3<br />

more typical Synoptic parallel is also significant, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> Synoptic and<br />

Johann<strong>in</strong>e traditions come so close only rarely.<br />

The core has been elaborated by each Evangelist <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir typical ways.<br />

Luke stresses <strong>the</strong> materiality of <strong>Jesus</strong>' risen body (24.39, 43);" he cont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>the</strong><br />

fulfilled prophecy motif (24.44-46); 100 he foreshadows <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of a witness<br />

'beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g from Jerusalem' (24.47-48); 101 and he gives <strong>the</strong> first clear <strong>in</strong>dication<br />

that, so far as he was concerned, <strong>the</strong> disciples never stirred from Jerusalem<br />

(24.49). 102 John cont<strong>in</strong>ues his negative portrayal of '<strong>the</strong> Jews' (20.19); 103 he<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>ns <strong>the</strong> 'peace' motif (20.19, 21); 104 and he compresses <strong>in</strong>to this first appearance<br />

to <strong>the</strong> chief disciples his own equivalent both of <strong>the</strong> Pentecostal commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(20.21-22) 105 and of ecclesiastical authorization (20.23). 106<br />

Here <strong>the</strong>n we probably can speak of a tradition told and retold <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

early Christian communities; we have it only <strong>in</strong> two well-developed versions<br />

and one credal formula (1 Cor. 15.5). The fact that what was <strong>the</strong>reby recalled<br />

was a group experience ra<strong>the</strong>r than that of an <strong>in</strong>dividual is presumably significant.<br />

This was church tradition from <strong>the</strong> first, hav<strong>in</strong>g been given its still visible<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>e, presumably, from <strong>the</strong> participants' talk<strong>in</strong>g about it among <strong>the</strong>mselves. 107<br />

99. Luke makes a po<strong>in</strong>t of stress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> tangibility of div<strong>in</strong>e action with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> everyday<br />

world: <strong>the</strong> dove at Jordan '<strong>in</strong> bodily form' (Luke 3.22), <strong>the</strong> witness of <strong>the</strong> transfiguration not a<br />

dream (9.32), <strong>the</strong> 'many conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g proofs' of <strong>the</strong> resurrection (Acts 1.3), <strong>the</strong> angel who released<br />

Peter from prison real and not a vision (12.9), <strong>the</strong> Spirit's com<strong>in</strong>g evidenced by visible<br />

and audible phenomena (2.4, 6, 33; 4.31; 8.17-18; 10.45-46; 19.6), and so on (see fur<strong>the</strong>r my<br />

Unity and Diversity 180-84).<br />

100. See above, n. 88.<br />

101. See above, §8.1c.<br />

102. For <strong>the</strong> centrality of Jerusalem as <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of cont<strong>in</strong>uity with Israel's history and<br />

founta<strong>in</strong>head of <strong>the</strong> Christian mission, see below, <strong>vol</strong>. 2.<br />

103. The negative role attributed to '<strong>the</strong> Jews' is a feature of <strong>the</strong> Fourth Gospel; see, e.g.,<br />

several essays <strong>in</strong> R. Bier<strong>in</strong>ger, et al., eds., Anti-Judaism and <strong>the</strong> Fourth Gospel: Papers of <strong>the</strong><br />

Leuven Colloquium, 2000 (Assen: Van Gorcum, 2001), and fur<strong>the</strong>r below, <strong>vol</strong>. 3.<br />

104. The triple greet<strong>in</strong>g 'Peace be with you' <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrection narratives (20.19, 21,<br />

26), is clearly <strong>in</strong>tended to hark back to <strong>the</strong> farewell bestowal of peace <strong>in</strong> 14.27 (also 16.33).<br />

105. John 20.22 is traditionally called '<strong>the</strong> Johann<strong>in</strong>e Pentecost', and can <strong>in</strong>deed be regarded<br />

as John's <strong>the</strong>ological compression of <strong>the</strong> Pentecost tradition (Acts 2) <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

complex of <strong>Jesus</strong>' death and resurrection/ascension (cf. 19.30). Note also <strong>the</strong> deliberate use of<br />

emphysaö ('brea<strong>the</strong>'), <strong>in</strong> obvious echo of <strong>the</strong> LXX Gen. 2.7 (already echoed <strong>in</strong> Ezek. 37.9 and<br />

Wis. 15.11); this is new creation. See fur<strong>the</strong>r my Baptism 173-82.<br />

106. John 20.23 is closer to Matt. 16.19 and 18.18 than to Luke 24.47 (see fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Brown, John 1039-45).<br />

107. I press <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t aga<strong>in</strong>st those who argue too glibly from <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> earliest<br />

tradition is confession of resurrection appearances (1 Cor. 15.5-8) and conclude that <strong>the</strong>re were<br />

no narratives of resurrection appearances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g (e.g., Wilckens, 'Tradition-History'<br />

73-75). One form (kerygmatic confession) does not exclude ano<strong>the</strong>r (narrative). It is much<br />

850

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!