09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §17.5<br />

Scripture must be fulfilled (teles<strong>the</strong>nai) <strong>in</strong> me, "And he was counted among<br />

<strong>the</strong> lawless" (Isa. 53.12); and <strong>in</strong>deed what is written about me is be<strong>in</strong>g fulfilled<br />

(telos echei)'. 38 They said, 'Lord, look, here are two swords'. He replied,<br />

'It is enough'.<br />

The quotation 224 belongs to an obviously ancient context: <strong>the</strong> mysterious 'two<br />

swords' say<strong>in</strong>g would probably be embarrass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> many circles (hence its absence<br />

from Mark and Mat<strong>the</strong>w?); here we probably have ano<strong>the</strong>r case where <strong>the</strong><br />

criterion of embarrassment is decisive. 225 But <strong>the</strong> quotation itself is framed by<br />

characteristic Lukan language. 226 The verse does seem to disrupt <strong>the</strong> context,<br />

where v. 38 follows directly from v. 36. 227 And it fits with Luke's use elsewhere<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Servant motif as part of a 'humiliation-exaltation' motif (ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of vicarious suffer<strong>in</strong>g). 228 So <strong>the</strong> question arises whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> quotation of<br />

Isa. 53.12 is part of <strong>the</strong> early proof-from-prophecy apologetic prom<strong>in</strong>ent elsewhere<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Passion narrative (§17.If), though why it should have been <strong>in</strong>serted<br />

here rema<strong>in</strong>s unclear. A tradition-historical analysis cannot trace it back to <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

with any confidence.<br />

(2) Mark 10.45. The fuller passage has already been cited <strong>in</strong> §14.3c; here<br />

we need recall only <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al verse.<br />

Matt. 20.28<br />

28 Just as <strong>the</strong><br />

Son of Man came not to be<br />

served but to serve and to give<br />

his life a ransom for many.<br />

Mark 10.45<br />

45 For <strong>the</strong><br />

Son of Man came not to be<br />

served but to serve, and to give<br />

his life a ransom for many.<br />

Luke 22.27<br />

27 For who is greater, <strong>the</strong> one<br />

who recl<strong>in</strong>es [at <strong>the</strong> table] or <strong>the</strong><br />

one who serves? Is it not <strong>the</strong> one<br />

who recl<strong>in</strong>es? But I am among<br />

you as one who serves.<br />

224. So far as <strong>the</strong> text itself is concerned (kai meta anomön elogis<strong>the</strong>), a direct derivation<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Hebrew can certa<strong>in</strong>ly be argued for (w e 'et-pos e 'im nimnä) (Jeremias, Proclamation<br />

294 n. 4), though <strong>the</strong> transmission was possibly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by knowledge of <strong>the</strong> LXX (kai<br />

en tois anomois elogis<strong>the</strong>), where logizö is not <strong>the</strong> usual render<strong>in</strong>g of manä.<br />

225. See also above, chapter 15 n. 40.<br />

226. Nolland refers particularly to 'what is written' and 'must be fulfilled <strong>in</strong> me' (Luke<br />

3.1076-77).<br />

227. L<strong>in</strong>dars, New Testament Apologetic 85. Pace Jeremias: 'The reason given <strong>in</strong> v. 37<br />

for this announcement — that, because <strong>Jesus</strong> will be driven out of <strong>the</strong> community of Israel as<br />

an anomos, so his disciples, too, will be treated as anomoi and refused food and <strong>the</strong>ir lives<br />

threatened — is <strong>in</strong>dispensable to <strong>the</strong> whole context' (Servant 105; followed by Marshall, Luke<br />

826). But <strong>the</strong> rationale of 22.37 is fulfilment/completion (teles<strong>the</strong>nai, telos); as an explanation<br />

of 22.36, 38 it is ra<strong>the</strong>r contrived with so much hav<strong>in</strong>g to be read <strong>in</strong> and still leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tent<br />

of 22.36 unclear.<br />

228. Fitzmyer, Luke 1432; see Acts 2.23-24; 3.14-15; 4.10; 5.30; 8.32-33; 10.39-40;<br />

13.28-30; also below on Luke 22.27.<br />

812

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!