09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§17.5 Crucifixus sub Pontio Pilato<br />

When you make his life an offer<strong>in</strong>g for s<strong>in</strong>, he shall see his offspr<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

shall prolong his days; through him <strong>the</strong> will of <strong>the</strong> Lord shall prosper. 1 lOut<br />

of his anguish he shall see light; he shall f<strong>in</strong>d satisfaction through his knowledge.<br />

The righteous one, my servant, shall make many righteous, and he<br />

shall bear <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>iquities. ^Therefore I will allot him a portion with <strong>the</strong><br />

great, and he shall divide <strong>the</strong> spoil with <strong>the</strong> strong; because he poured out<br />

himself to death, and was numbered with <strong>the</strong> transgressors; yet he bore <strong>the</strong><br />

s<strong>in</strong> of many, and made <strong>in</strong>tercession for <strong>the</strong> transgressors.<br />

Its relevance at this po<strong>in</strong>t is obvious: it envisages one (Yahweh's servant) who<br />

would suffer and be held of no account (53.2-3), whose suffer<strong>in</strong>gs would be vicarious,<br />

on behalf of o<strong>the</strong>rs (vv. 4-6), who would be killed (vv. 7-9), and whose<br />

vicarious suffer<strong>in</strong>g would be willed and accepted by God (vv. 10-12). 221<br />

There is little dispute that <strong>the</strong> passage became very <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> earliest<br />

Christian reflection on <strong>Jesus</strong>' death. But what evidence is <strong>the</strong>re that <strong>Jesus</strong> himself<br />

was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by this passage? 222<br />

(1) Luke 2231. The tradition of <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g conta<strong>in</strong>s only one direct<br />

quotation from Isaiah 53 223 — <strong>in</strong> Luke 2231, a tradition attested solely by Luke:<br />

35 He said to <strong>the</strong>m, 'When I sent you out without a purse, bag, or sandals, did<br />

you lack anyth<strong>in</strong>g?' They said, 'No, not a th<strong>in</strong>g'. 36He said to <strong>the</strong>m, 'But<br />

now, <strong>the</strong> one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And <strong>the</strong> one<br />

who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one. 37 For I tell you, this<br />

221. How <strong>the</strong> Servant was <strong>in</strong>tended to be understood rema<strong>in</strong>s disputed, <strong>the</strong> two chief options<br />

still be<strong>in</strong>g Israel or some particular <strong>in</strong>dividual. See discussion, e.g., <strong>in</strong> W. Zimmerli, pais<br />

<strong>the</strong>ou, TDNT 5.666-73; H. G. Reventlow, 'Basic Issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Interpretation of Isaiah 53', <strong>in</strong><br />

W. H. Bell<strong>in</strong>ger and W. R. Farmer, eds., <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Suffer<strong>in</strong>g Servant: Isaiah 53 and Christian<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>s (Harrisburg: Tr<strong>in</strong>ity, 1998) 23-38. 'There is still no evidence for a Jewish <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

of Isaiah 53 <strong>in</strong> terms of a suffer<strong>in</strong>g messiah' (Coll<strong>in</strong>s, Scepter 123-26 [here 124]).<br />

M. Hengel, 'Zur wirkungsgeschichte von Jes 53 <strong>in</strong> vorchristlicher Zeit', <strong>in</strong> B. Janowski and<br />

P. Stuhlmacher, eds., Der leidende Gottesknecht. Jesaja 53 und se<strong>in</strong>e Wirkungsgeschichte<br />

(Tüb<strong>in</strong>gen: Mohr Siebeck, 1996) 49-91, notes that 4Q491 and 4Q540-41 lack <strong>the</strong> motif of a<br />

representative death for s<strong>in</strong> (69-75, 88-90), but never<strong>the</strong>less concludes that <strong>the</strong> supposition is<br />

not altoge<strong>the</strong>r unfounded that '<strong>the</strong>re were already <strong>in</strong> pre-Christian time traditions of suffer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and aton<strong>in</strong>g eschatological-messianic figures <strong>in</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Judaism' which <strong>Jesus</strong> could have<br />

known and been <strong>in</strong>fluenced by (91).<br />

222. Especially noticeable are <strong>the</strong> quotations <strong>in</strong> Matt. 8.17 (Isa. 53.4); Acts 8.32-33 (Isa.<br />

53.7-8); and <strong>the</strong> multiple allusions <strong>in</strong> 1 Pet. 2.22-25 (Isa. 53.4, 6, 9, 12); Hooker now accepts<br />

that Rom. 4.25 conta<strong>in</strong>s a clear echo of Isaiah 53, but rema<strong>in</strong>s conv<strong>in</strong>ced that a negative answer<br />

has to be given to <strong>the</strong> question, 'Did <strong>the</strong> Use of Isaiah 53 to Interpret His Mission Beg<strong>in</strong> with<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>?' <strong>in</strong> Bell<strong>in</strong>ger and Fanner, <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Suffer<strong>in</strong>g Servant 88-103.<br />

223. John 12.38 (Isa. 53.1) and Matt. 8.17 (Isa. 53.4) are not presented as words of<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>.<br />

811

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!