09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§17.4 Crucifixus sub Pontio Pilato<br />

say<strong>in</strong>g had been extracted for separate use? Ei<strong>the</strong>r way, <strong>the</strong> double attestation of<br />

Mark and Luke <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>Jesus</strong> was remembered as us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> imagery of<br />

baptism to describe <strong>the</strong> suffer<strong>in</strong>g he expected to have to endure. 197<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Markan/Mat<strong>the</strong>an context, <strong>the</strong> cup say<strong>in</strong>g (Mark 10.38a/Matt. 20.22)<br />

also denotes expectation of suffer<strong>in</strong>g. 198 What is strik<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> prediction that<br />

James and John would have to dr<strong>in</strong>k from <strong>the</strong> same cup (Mark 10.39a/Matt. 20.23<br />

— and endure <strong>the</strong> same baptism: Mark 10.39b). Such a prediction can hardly have<br />

been first articulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early years of <strong>Christianity</strong>. 199 It must go back to <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

and have been reta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition, despite lack of fulfilment thus<br />

far, because it was remembered as a prediction of <strong>Jesus</strong> and treasured as such. 200<br />

Here we should recall also that <strong>the</strong> cup imagery reappears <strong>in</strong> all forms of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gethsemane tradition (Mark 14.36 pars.). 201 <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> his great distress and<br />

anguish asks to be exempted from <strong>the</strong> suffer<strong>in</strong>g implied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> image: 'let this<br />

cup pass from me'. As already noted, 202 <strong>the</strong> not at all flatter<strong>in</strong>g portrayal of <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> garden is probably a fair representation of his state of m<strong>in</strong>d. By <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

must have been all too well aware of what likely lay ahead, and was recalled as<br />

blanch<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> prospect.<br />

More <strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> double fire/baptism say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Luke 12.49-50. (1) It<br />

is highly enigmatic. To what did <strong>the</strong> early churches refer it? From what fulfilment<br />

could <strong>the</strong>y have derived it? (2) The say<strong>in</strong>gs are obviously parallel <strong>in</strong> form<br />

('fire I came to cast. . . ; baptism I have to be baptized with . . .'), suggest<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

Semitic structure and orig<strong>in</strong>. 203 (3) Thomas has an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g parallel to Luke<br />

12.49: '<strong>Jesus</strong> said, 'I have cast fire upon <strong>the</strong> world, and see, I am guard<strong>in</strong>g it until<br />

it is ablaze' (GTh 10). Both Luke and Thomas recall <strong>Jesus</strong> as talk<strong>in</strong>g about cast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fire on <strong>the</strong> earth/world.<br />

197. On baptism as a metaphor for suffer<strong>in</strong>g see below (n. 206 and §17.5c).<br />

198. The 'cup' to be drunk from was a familiar metaphor for suffer<strong>in</strong>g div<strong>in</strong>e judgment<br />

(e.g., Pss. 11.6; 75.7-8; Isa. 51.17, 22; Jer. 25.15-17, 27-29; Ezek. 23.31-34; Hab. 2.16; Zech.<br />

12.2; lQpHab 11.14-15; Pss. Sol. 8.14). Casey draws attention also to Mart. Isa. 5.13, and<br />

Targ. Neof. on Deut. 32.1: 'people (sons of men) who die and taste <strong>the</strong> cup of death'. See fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Bayer, <strong>Jesus</strong>' Predictions 10-11.<br />

199. James was martyred about 44 CE (Acts 12.2), but Irenaeus reports that John lived to<br />

<strong>the</strong> time of Trajan (98-117 CE; Adv. haer. 2.22.5; 3.3.4); <strong>the</strong> data are briefly reviewed <strong>in</strong> Davies<br />

and Allison, Mat<strong>the</strong>w 3.90-92, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g n. 39 on <strong>the</strong> much less reliable tradition that John was<br />

killed at <strong>the</strong> same time as James.<br />

200. See also Bayer, <strong>Jesus</strong>' Predictions 59-61.<br />

201. Although John has totally transformed <strong>the</strong> tradition of <strong>Jesus</strong>' prayer <strong>in</strong> Gethsemane,<br />

he has taken care to <strong>in</strong>clude reference to <strong>the</strong> cup of suffer<strong>in</strong>g: '<strong>the</strong> cup which my Fa<strong>the</strong>r has<br />

given me, shall I not dr<strong>in</strong>k it?' (John 18.11).<br />

202. § 16.2b.<br />

203. Burney, Poetry 63, 90; see also Black, Aramaic Approach 123. Characteristic<br />

Lukan style (echo, synechomai) demonstrates no more than performance variation (cf. Beasley-<br />

Murray, <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom 248-49).<br />

803

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!