09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §17.3<br />

(1) <strong>Jesus</strong> spoke of himself as <strong>the</strong> Son of Man who would 'come' to <strong>the</strong> Ancient<br />

of Days to take <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r throne with Yahweh (Dan. 7.9-14). I have already<br />

speculated along <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es of such a possibility on my own account (Mark 14.62;<br />

§ 16.4c), but rema<strong>in</strong> unclear how such a future v<strong>in</strong>dication/com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> or to<br />

heaven (as Wright <strong>in</strong>sists) relates to <strong>Jesus</strong>' earlier com<strong>in</strong>g to Jerusalem on<br />

Wright's <strong>the</strong>sis.<br />

(2) <strong>Jesus</strong>' parable of <strong>the</strong> talents/pounds comes to us <strong>in</strong> its two forms (Matt.<br />

25.14-30/Luke 19.12-27). 167 Mat<strong>the</strong>w's version envisages a 'man' who, 'go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on a journey' (apodemön), entrusted his property to his servants (as <strong>in</strong> Mark<br />

13.34), and who returned 'after a long time' to settle accounts (Matt. 25.19).<br />

Luke's version has a nobleman (eugenes) who goes to a distant country 'to receive<br />

a k<strong>in</strong>gdom for himself and return', likewise expect<strong>in</strong>g his servants to trade<br />

profitably with <strong>the</strong> money he entrusted to <strong>the</strong>m. Although only Luke talks <strong>in</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>gly terms, 168 Wright deduces that <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g/master <strong>in</strong> such teach<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

(as <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Jewish parables) would normally be taken to refer to Israel's God. 169<br />

He likewise dismisses an <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong> master's/k<strong>in</strong>g's return <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 'second com<strong>in</strong>g', and argues that it is better read as referr<strong>in</strong>g to Yahweh's return<br />

to Zion 'and to <strong>the</strong> devastat<strong>in</strong>g results that this will produce'. 170<br />

On this po<strong>in</strong>t too I have already <strong>in</strong>dicated sympathy with <strong>the</strong> view that talk<br />

of 'second com<strong>in</strong>g' belongs more to <strong>the</strong> perspective of <strong>the</strong> subsequent retell<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>the</strong> parables of 'return' and o<strong>the</strong>r 'com<strong>in</strong>g' say<strong>in</strong>gs, than to <strong>the</strong> perspective of<br />

first utterance. 171 And talk of a return<strong>in</strong>g master/owner/bridegroom as symbol of<br />

impend<strong>in</strong>g crisis and judgment is firmly enough rooted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition<br />

(§12.4g). But it is far from clear from <strong>the</strong>se data that <strong>Jesus</strong> saw himself <strong>in</strong> this<br />

role or his journey to Jerusalem as an enact<strong>in</strong>g or embodiment of Yahweh's return<br />

to Zion.<br />

Here as before we must be careful not to impose an order or clarity of our<br />

own creation on data that are characteristically parabolic/metaphorical. Talk of<br />

'Yahweh's return to Zion' was certa<strong>in</strong>ly one important strand <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiplex<br />

strands of Jewish expectation, and it is quite likely that it <strong>in</strong>fluenced <strong>Jesus</strong>' own<br />

formulation when he spoke of <strong>the</strong> mount<strong>in</strong>g crisis confront<strong>in</strong>g Israel and its lead-<br />

167. See above, chapter 12 n. 210.<br />

168. The echo of Archelaus' attempt to secure <strong>the</strong> full <strong>in</strong>heritance of his fa<strong>the</strong>r's (Herod<br />

<strong>the</strong> Great's) k<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>in</strong> 4 BCE is generally acknowledged (Josephus, War 2.1-38, 80-100; Ant.<br />

17.219-49, 299-320); whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>Jesus</strong> told <strong>the</strong> story <strong>in</strong> this form, <strong>the</strong> fact that an almost explicit<br />

political comment was circulated among early Christian groups is itself noteworthy.<br />

169. <strong>Jesus</strong> 634, cit<strong>in</strong>g e.g. Luke 16.1-13; Mark 12.1-12 pars; m. Abot 1.3; 2.14-16; 3.1,<br />

17; 4.22; and quot<strong>in</strong>g Dodd, Parables 151; Wright goes on to cite <strong>the</strong> parables of crisis and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r material surveyed above under §12.4e, g (<strong>Jesus</strong> 640-2).<br />

170. <strong>Jesus</strong> 636.<br />

171. See above, §§12.4g and 16.4f.<br />

794

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!