09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS MISSION §17.3<br />

tures and early postbiblical writ<strong>in</strong>gs. He notes that <strong>in</strong> Jewish Scripture <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

fundamental conviction regard<strong>in</strong>g Zion as <strong>the</strong> dwell<strong>in</strong>g-place and throne of<br />

God. From this tw<strong>in</strong> concept, Zion <strong>the</strong>ology emerges: Zion as <strong>the</strong> place of refuge,<br />

security, and bless<strong>in</strong>g 153 and particularly Zion as <strong>the</strong> dest<strong>in</strong>ation for <strong>the</strong> eschatological<br />

pilgrimage of <strong>the</strong> nations, Zion as <strong>the</strong> centre for Yahweh's universal<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ion. 154<br />

That <strong>Jesus</strong> shared this Zion <strong>the</strong>ology is suggested for Tan by three passages.<br />

155 (1) In Matt. 5.34-35 <strong>Jesus</strong> calls Jerusalem '<strong>the</strong> city of <strong>the</strong> great k<strong>in</strong>g'<br />

(Ps. 48.1). Despite its sole attestation <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w, this may well conta<strong>in</strong> a recollection<br />

of <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g. 156 (2) In Luke 13.32-33 <strong>Jesus</strong> speaks of reach<strong>in</strong>g his<br />

goal (teleioö), by implication, <strong>in</strong> Jerusalem. This is more problematic, s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

teleioö occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptics only <strong>in</strong> Luke (2.43; 13.32), and 13.33 is one of<br />

Luke's dei passages; <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong>re is more than a h<strong>in</strong>t of suspicion that<br />

<strong>the</strong> note of div<strong>in</strong>ely <strong>in</strong>tended outcome may owe more to Luke's retell<strong>in</strong>g than <strong>the</strong><br />

earlier tradition. 157<br />

(3) Luke attaches 13.31-33 to <strong>the</strong> Q lament over Jerusalem:<br />

Matt. 23.37-39<br />

37 Jerusalem. Jerusalem, <strong>the</strong> citv that kills<br />

<strong>the</strong> prophets and stones those who are sent to it!<br />

How often have I desired to ga<strong>the</strong>r vour children<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r as a hen ga<strong>the</strong>rs her brood under her<br />

w<strong>in</strong>es, and vou were not will<strong>in</strong>g! 38 See, vour<br />

house is left to vou. desolate. 39 For I tell vou.<br />

vou will not see me aea<strong>in</strong> until<br />

vou sav, 'Blessed is <strong>the</strong> one who comes<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> Lord'.<br />

Luke 13.34-35<br />

34 Jerusalem. Jerusalem, <strong>the</strong> citv that kills<br />

<strong>the</strong> prophets and stones those who are sent to it!<br />

How often have I desired to ga<strong>the</strong>r vour children<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r as a hen (ga<strong>the</strong>rs) her brood under her<br />

w<strong>in</strong>gs, and vou were not will<strong>in</strong>g! 35 See. vour<br />

house is left to vou. And I tell vou.<br />

vou will not see me until <strong>the</strong> time comes<br />

when vou sav. 'Blessed is <strong>the</strong> one who comes <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> Lord'.<br />

The say<strong>in</strong>g is regularly discounted as a word of <strong>Jesus</strong> precisely because of <strong>the</strong><br />

strength of <strong>the</strong> self-affirmed role claimed by <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> suggestion of a prophecy<br />

after <strong>the</strong> event. 158 But <strong>the</strong> later <strong>in</strong>sertion of such a say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a tradition<br />

which gave no account of earlier visits by <strong>Jesus</strong> to Jerusalem is somewhat difficult<br />

to credit. The implication that death by ston<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>the</strong> likely outcome for<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> is hardly a creation ex eventu. A say<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> Q almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly predates<br />

<strong>the</strong> destruction of Jerusalem (not till 70 CE), and so is a gloomy forebod<strong>in</strong>g on ei-<br />

153. E.g., Pss. 9.12-13; 20.2-3; 46.6; Isa. 7.1-17; 30.1-5; 31.1-3. See also J. D.<br />

Levenson, 'Zion Traditions', ABD 6.1098-1102.<br />

154. See above, chapter 12 nn. 70, 71; Tan, Zion Traditions 29 n. 33, 31-42.<br />

155. Tan, Zion Traditions Part II.<br />

156. See above, chapter 14 n. 159.<br />

157. See above, §15.6c. But Becker builds his answer to <strong>the</strong> question about <strong>Jesus</strong>' own<br />

view of <strong>the</strong> future from Luke 13.32 (<strong>Jesus</strong> 338-39).<br />

158. Steck, Israel 53-55; Funk, Five Gospels 245; Lüdemann, <strong>Jesus</strong> 357.<br />

792

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!