09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE CLIMAX OF JESUS' MISSION §17.3<br />

would make his mission a cause of irritation to <strong>the</strong> Temple authorities and<br />

make <strong>Jesus</strong> himself a target for <strong>the</strong>ir hostility.<br />

In short, <strong>the</strong>re are sufficient <strong>in</strong>dications that <strong>the</strong> emphases of <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and <strong>the</strong> manner <strong>in</strong> which he prosecuted his mission were likely to have<br />

roused <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g anger and hostility towards him from <strong>the</strong> high priestly families<br />

and Temple authorities. The symbolic action <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple and statement about<br />

its destruction were likely only to confirm long germ<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g suspicions and to<br />

persuade <strong>the</strong> policy-makers that <strong>Jesus</strong> should be silenced as soon as possible.<br />

If <strong>the</strong>n we can deduce a reasonable explanation for <strong>the</strong> events lead<strong>in</strong>g up to<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>' execution, what of <strong>Jesus</strong>' own <strong>in</strong>tentions <strong>in</strong> all this? The question raises<br />

complex and much disputed issues and is best broken down to a sequence of<br />

questions. The discussion just completed immediately raises <strong>the</strong> first of <strong>the</strong>se.<br />

For if it is <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>the</strong> case that <strong>Jesus</strong> had already aroused priestly opposition and<br />

that to go up to Jerusalem was to put himself with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grasp of his most powerful<br />

opponents, we can hardly avoid ask<strong>in</strong>g why he went.<br />

17.3. Why Did <strong>Jesus</strong> Go Up to Jerusalem?<br />

With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework of <strong>the</strong> Gospels <strong>the</strong> answer is clear. The Evangelists, tell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> story <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> light of <strong>the</strong> fuller <strong>in</strong>sight which Easter brought, have no doubt<br />

that <strong>the</strong> whole sequence was foreorda<strong>in</strong>ed. Luke especially emphasizes <strong>the</strong> 'plan'<br />

predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed by God, 141 <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e necessity of what had happened, 142 and beg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

his account of <strong>the</strong> journey to Jerusalem with <strong>the</strong> om<strong>in</strong>ous words: 'When <strong>the</strong><br />

days drew near for him to be taken up (analempseös), he set his face to go to Jerusalem'<br />

(Luke 9.51). 143 As before, 144 we need not <strong>in</strong>fer that <strong>the</strong> whole motif is<br />

<strong>the</strong> creation of a post-Easter perspective. We can hardly exclude <strong>the</strong> likelihood<br />

that <strong>Jesus</strong> himself may have been driven by some sense of dest<strong>in</strong>y. 145 But how<br />

well rooted with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition is an answer along <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es? Those who<br />

141. Boule ('plan') <strong>in</strong> Luke 7.30; Acts 2.23; 13.36; 20.27; horizö ('determ<strong>in</strong>e') <strong>in</strong> Luke<br />

22.22; Acts 2.23; 10.42; 17.31.<br />

142. Dei ('it is necessary that...'), eleven occurrences <strong>in</strong> Luke (particularly 9.22; 13.33;<br />

17.25; 22.37; 24.7, 26,44) and seventeen <strong>in</strong> Acts; much less frequent <strong>in</strong> Mark and Mat<strong>the</strong>w, but<br />

most significantly <strong>in</strong> Mark 8.3 I/Matt. 16.21 (on <strong>the</strong> Passion predictions see below, § 17.4c). See<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r Fitzmyer, Luke 1.179-80; J. T. Squires, The Plan of God <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts (SNTSMS 76;<br />

Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1993).<br />

143. See aga<strong>in</strong> Fitzmyer, Luke 1.827-28.<br />

144. See above, chapter 13 at n. 31.<br />

145. 'When <strong>the</strong> details are bracketed out, what rema<strong>in</strong>s is <strong>the</strong> rudimentary sense of dest<strong>in</strong>y'<br />

(Keck, Who Is <strong>Jesus</strong>? 117-18). Contrast Becker: '<strong>Jesus</strong> and his followers went to <strong>the</strong> city<br />

of Zion simply to take part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> festival' (<strong>Jesus</strong> 345).<br />

790

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!