09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§17.2 Crucifixus sub Pontio Pilato<br />

God of forgiveness, a merciful and gracious God 'forgiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>iquity and transgression<br />

and s<strong>in</strong>' (Exod. 34.6-7). 123 Prayer for forgiveness was part of Israel's liturgy.<br />

124 And <strong>the</strong> sacrificial system, particularly <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong> offer<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> Day of<br />

Atonement, was designed to provide forgiveness. 125 So talk of forgiveness now<br />

and <strong>the</strong> reality of forgiveness experienced now would hardly have been strange to<br />

<strong>the</strong> devout Jew of <strong>Jesus</strong>' time.<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>, however, is recalled as caus<strong>in</strong>g surprise or offence by say<strong>in</strong>g 'Your<br />

s<strong>in</strong>s are forgiven' both to <strong>the</strong> paralyzed man, (Mark 2.5, 9 pars.), 126 and to <strong>the</strong> 's<strong>in</strong>ner'<br />

who ano<strong>in</strong>ted his feet <strong>in</strong> Luke 7.48-49. 127 In <strong>the</strong> former case <strong>the</strong> story now attests<br />

<strong>the</strong> Son of Man's authority to forgive s<strong>in</strong>s (2.10), and that affirmation answers<br />

<strong>the</strong> querulous response of <strong>the</strong> scribes, 'Who can forgive s<strong>in</strong>s but God alone?' (2.7).<br />

But <strong>the</strong> statement, 'Your s<strong>in</strong>s are forgiven', is simply a pronouncement of forgiveness,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> passive form of <strong>the</strong> verb 128 <strong>in</strong>dicates that it is God who forgives (as<br />

when a Christian priest pronounces absolution <strong>in</strong> a present-day Christian congregation).<br />

129 Presumably this was <strong>the</strong> implication too when <strong>the</strong> Baptist pronounced<br />

s<strong>in</strong>s forgiven (as implied by Mark 1.4/Luke 3.3), 130 or when <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prayer of<br />

Nabonidus from Qumran, Nabonidus says 'an exorcist forgave my s<strong>in</strong>' (4QprNab<br />

4). 131 In nei<strong>the</strong>r case is <strong>the</strong>re any thought of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> question usurp<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

div<strong>in</strong>e prerogative, only of human mediation of div<strong>in</strong>e forgiveness. 132<br />

A more likely cause of protest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cident itself was that <strong>Jesus</strong> pro-<br />

123. Exod. 34.6-7 is regularly echoed <strong>in</strong> Jewish Scripture (Num. 14.18; Neh. 9.17; Pss.<br />

86.15; 130.4; 145.8; Dan. 9.9; Joel 2.13; Jon. 4.2; Mic. 7.18; Nah. 1.3).<br />

124. E.g., 1 Kgs. 8.30-50; 2 Kgs. 5.18; 2 Chron. 6.21-39; Pss. 25.11; 32; 51; 79.9;<br />

Prayer of Manasseh. As Ps. 51.16-19 rem<strong>in</strong>ds us, while sacrifice without such prayer was recognized<br />

to be va<strong>in</strong>, effective prayer which could dispense with sacrifice was not contemplated.<br />

Note also, of course, Matt. 6.12/Luke 11.4; Mark 11.25/Matt. 6.14-15.<br />

125. In <strong>the</strong> legislation govern<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong> offer<strong>in</strong>gs and guilt offer<strong>in</strong>gs (Leviticus 4-5) we f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>the</strong> repeated phrase, 'so <strong>the</strong> priest shall make atonement for him for his s<strong>in</strong>s, and he shall be forgiven'<br />

(4.26, 31, 35; 5.10, 16, 18). Note also <strong>the</strong> range of s<strong>in</strong>s aga<strong>in</strong>st God and <strong>the</strong> neighbour<br />

covered by such provision (Lev. 6.1-7). Eschatological forgiveness (Jer. 31.34) was presumably<br />

not thought of as a first-time forgiveness but as a complete or f<strong>in</strong>al (?) forgiveness.<br />

126. Cited above, §15.7e.<br />

127. But o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition is silent on <strong>the</strong> subject, apart from John 20.23.<br />

128. The 'div<strong>in</strong>e passive' (Jeremias, Proclamation 11).<br />

129. Already <strong>in</strong> John 20.23 that is regarded as 'authority to forgive s<strong>in</strong>s' (to echo Mark<br />

2.10 pars.).<br />

130. In a similar way <strong>the</strong> Qumran sect bypassed <strong>the</strong> Temple by claim<strong>in</strong>g that atonement<br />

could be experienced <strong>in</strong>dependently of <strong>the</strong> Temple cult (see above, chapter 11 nn. 94, 99).<br />

131. Garcia Mart<strong>in</strong>ez reconstructs <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g phrase (miss<strong>in</strong>g) as T prayed to <strong>the</strong><br />

God Most High and an exorcist forgave my s<strong>in</strong>' (3-4) — a plausible suggestion, s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

Nabonidus goes on to testify (presumably) to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> prayers he had made<br />

previously to <strong>the</strong> gods of silver and gold . . . (7).<br />

132. Sanders, <strong>Jesus</strong> 273; Leivestad, <strong>Jesus</strong> 137-38.<br />

787

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!