09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FAITH AND THE HISTORICAL JESUS §4.6<br />

as significant for <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fluence on contemporary use of <strong>the</strong> Gospel portrayal of<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong>, particularly <strong>in</strong> terms of liberation <strong>the</strong>ology, as <strong>the</strong>y have been for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

contributions to <strong>the</strong> 'quest of <strong>the</strong> historical <strong>Jesus</strong>' as such — if not more. 143<br />

b. Richard Horsley<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r most important voice <strong>in</strong> call<strong>in</strong>g for a realistic historical sociology of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> movement has been Richard Horsley. Reviv<strong>in</strong>g an emphasis which has<br />

surfaced periodically <strong>in</strong> 'Life of <strong>Jesus</strong>' research, 144 Horsley protests vigorously<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> depoliticisation of <strong>Jesus</strong> and his mission and questions <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological<br />

presuppositions which have dom<strong>in</strong>ated most previous discussion. 145 In particular,<br />

traditional <strong>in</strong>terpretations of <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualized his teach<strong>in</strong>g and assumed<br />

that 'religion' and 'politics' are two quite separate categories; whereas <strong>the</strong> tradition<br />

for <strong>Jesus</strong> was that of <strong>the</strong> political prophets, Elijah and Elisha, and he was executed<br />

as a political agitator or crim<strong>in</strong>al, charges of which he was hardly entirely<br />

<strong>in</strong>nocent. 146 In <strong>Jesus</strong>' teach<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God should not be understood <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of <strong>the</strong> older apocalyptic eschatology as <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> world ('cosmic catastrophe'),<br />

but as 'a political metaphor and symbol' of <strong>the</strong> restoration of society<br />

and <strong>the</strong> renewal of social life; <strong>Jesus</strong>' concern was for noth<strong>in</strong>g less than '<strong>the</strong> renewal<br />

of Israel' conceived <strong>in</strong> 'some fairly def<strong>in</strong>ite and dist<strong>in</strong>ctive patterns of social<br />

relationship'. 147 What was <strong>in</strong> view, <strong>the</strong>n, was not particular groups or wander<strong>in</strong>g<br />

charismatics, but local communities, conceived <strong>in</strong> familial but nonpatriarchal<br />

terms (Mark 3.35), communities without hierarchy (Matt. 23.8-9)<br />

whose members took economic responsibility for one ano<strong>the</strong>r ('forgive us our<br />

(Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1975) 20-37. It also worked with a conception of <strong>Jesus</strong> as a<br />

millenarian prophet (28-32) which was just about to go out of fashion among those from whom<br />

Gager might have expected support (see fur<strong>the</strong>r below, §4.7).<br />

143. Notably L. Boff, <strong>Jesus</strong> Christ Liberator: A Critical Christology for Our Time<br />

(Maryknoll: Orbis, 1978); J. L. Segundo, The Historical <strong>Jesus</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Synoptics (1982; ET<br />

Maryknoll: Orbis, 1985); E. Schüssler Fiorenza, In Memory of Her: A Fem<strong>in</strong>ist Theological<br />

Reconstruction of Christian Orig<strong>in</strong>s (New York: Crossroad, 1983) 105-59; see also her '<strong>Jesus</strong><br />

and <strong>the</strong> Politics of Interpretation', HTR 90 (1997) 343-58. They regard traditional dogmatic<br />

concerns as a cloak for colonial and patriarchal oppression.<br />

144. From Reimarus (§4.2) to S. G. F. Brandon, <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Zealots: A Study of <strong>the</strong><br />

Political Factor <strong>in</strong> Primitive <strong>Christianity</strong> (Manchester: Manchester University, 1967).<br />

145. R. A. Horsley, <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Spiral of Violence: Popular Jewish Resistance <strong>in</strong> Roman<br />

Palest<strong>in</strong>e (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1987).<br />

146. Horsley, <strong>Jesus</strong> 151-53, 156-57, 160-64; also ch. 10.<br />

147. Horsley, <strong>Jesus</strong> 168-72, 192-208. Horsley has deeply <strong>in</strong>fluenced R. D. Kaylor, <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Prophet: His Vision of <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom on Earth (Louisville: Westm<strong>in</strong>ster/John Knox., 1994)<br />

particularly ch. 3.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!