Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§4.6 The Flight from Dogma logically determined reconstruction of Christianity's beginnings is vulnerable to heavy criticism. 137 In particular, he has given the tradition of Jesus commissioning his disciples in mission (Mark 6.6-13 pars.) a definitive role for the Jesus movement as a whole. 138 He fails to ask about the rhetoric of various passages on the cost of discipleship (e.g., Luke 14.26) and interprets them too literally. 139 His interpretation is at times rather tendentious; for example Matt. 19.28 indicates that the task of the twelve 'lay among the twelve (scattered) tribes of Israel'; and Acts 13.1 shows Antioch to be 'the "home" of a group of wandering charismatics'. 140 And his understanding of tradition as kept alive by wandering charismatics rather than in and by settled communities seems to owe more (unrecognized) to a romantic conception of wandering bards than to a sociology of community tradition (see chapter 8 below). In short, it is only by setting various sayings of Jesus into the context which Theissen proposes that he is able to interpret them as he does. Whereas, as we shall see, such sayings do not diminish in radical force when understood as a call to reshape the social conventions of Jesus' day. Nevertheless, Theissen's reconstruction of an earliest stage of the Jesus tradition kept alive by homeless itinerants, with clear parallels in worldrenouncing itinerant Cynic philosophers, has had far-reaching influence, particularly on the neo-Liberal Jesus to be described below in §4.7. 141 Shortly following Theissen, John Gager's Kingdom and Community made a substantial stir, but its treatment of Jesus was too much dependent on an analytic model drawn on the template of later millenarian movements (particularly Melanesian cargo cults) to be of lasting significance. 142 Other works have been 137. For a critique from a sociological perspective see particularly J. H. Elliott, 'Social- Scientific Criticism of the New Testament and Its Social World', Semeia 35 (1986) 1-33; R. A. Horsley, Sociology and the Jesus Movement (New York: Continuum, 1989, 2 1994) 30-42. Horsley characterizes Theissen's presentation of the Jesus movement as 'a modern domestication of the Gospel materials' (39). 138. Theissen is also overly dependent on Didache 11, repeating the mistakes made in the debate about Charisma and Office (Charisma and Amt) occasioned by the publication of the Didache at the end of the nineteenth century (see my Theology of Paul 566-67); Crossan, The Birth of Christianity (HarperSanFrancisco, 1998) Part VIII, pushes still further down the same line (see below, chapter 14 n. 72). Similarly, his concept of 'charisma' owes more to Weber than to Paul, for whom charisma was an essentially community function (Rom. 12.4-6; 1 Cor. 12.4- 27). 139. See further Horsley, Sociology 43-50; 'this uncritical use of individual texts in support of contentions that most in fact do not attest' (45). 140. First Followers 9. 141. See below, chapter 7, n. 96. Theissen was to some extent anticipated by P. Hoffmann, Studien zur Theologie der Logienquelle (Münster: Aschendorff, 1972, 2 1975) 332-34. 142. J. G. Gager, Kingdom and Community: The Social World of Early Christianity 55

§4.6 The Flight from Dogma<br />

logically determ<strong>in</strong>ed reconstruction of <strong>Christianity</strong>'s beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs is vulnerable to<br />

heavy criticism. 137 In particular, he has given <strong>the</strong> tradition of <strong>Jesus</strong> commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

his disciples <strong>in</strong> mission (Mark 6.6-13 pars.) a def<strong>in</strong>itive role for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

movement as a whole. 138 He fails to ask about <strong>the</strong> rhetoric of various passages on<br />

<strong>the</strong> cost of discipleship (e.g., Luke 14.26) and <strong>in</strong>terprets <strong>the</strong>m too literally. 139 His<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation is at times ra<strong>the</strong>r tendentious; for example Matt. 19.28 <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

that <strong>the</strong> task of <strong>the</strong> twelve 'lay among <strong>the</strong> twelve (scattered) tribes of Israel'; and<br />

Acts 13.1 shows Antioch to be '<strong>the</strong> "home" of a group of wander<strong>in</strong>g charismatics'.<br />

140 And his understand<strong>in</strong>g of tradition as kept alive by wander<strong>in</strong>g<br />

charismatics ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong> and by settled communities seems to owe more (unrecognized)<br />

to a romantic conception of wander<strong>in</strong>g bards than to a sociology of<br />

community tradition (see chapter 8 below). In short, it is only by sett<strong>in</strong>g various<br />

say<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> context which Theissen proposes that he is able to <strong>in</strong>terpret<br />

<strong>the</strong>m as he does. Whereas, as we shall see, such say<strong>in</strong>gs do not dim<strong>in</strong>ish <strong>in</strong><br />

radical force when understood as a call to reshape <strong>the</strong> social conventions of <strong>Jesus</strong>'<br />

day. Never<strong>the</strong>less, Theissen's reconstruction of an earliest stage of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

tradition kept alive by homeless it<strong>in</strong>erants, with clear parallels <strong>in</strong> worldrenounc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

it<strong>in</strong>erant Cynic philosophers, has had far-reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence, particularly<br />

on <strong>the</strong> neo-Liberal <strong>Jesus</strong> to be described below <strong>in</strong> §4.7. 141<br />

Shortly follow<strong>in</strong>g Theissen, John Gager's K<strong>in</strong>gdom and Community made<br />

a substantial stir, but its treatment of <strong>Jesus</strong> was too much dependent on an analytic<br />

model drawn on <strong>the</strong> template of later millenarian movements (particularly<br />

Melanesian cargo cults) to be of last<strong>in</strong>g significance. 142 O<strong>the</strong>r works have been<br />

137. For a critique from a sociological perspective see particularly J. H. Elliott, 'Social-<br />

Scientific Criticism of <strong>the</strong> New Testament and Its Social World', Semeia 35 (1986) 1-33; R. A.<br />

Horsley, Sociology and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> Movement (New York: Cont<strong>in</strong>uum, 1989, 2 1994) 30-42. Horsley<br />

characterizes Theissen's presentation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> movement as 'a modern domestication of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gospel materials' (39).<br />

138. Theissen is also overly dependent on Didache 11, repeat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mistakes made <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> debate about Charisma and Office (Charisma and Amt) occasioned by <strong>the</strong> publication of <strong>the</strong><br />

Didache at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century (see my Theology of Paul 566-67); Crossan, The<br />

Birth of <strong>Christianity</strong> (HarperSanFrancisco, 1998) Part VIII, pushes still fur<strong>the</strong>r down <strong>the</strong> same<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e (see below, chapter 14 n. 72). Similarly, his concept of 'charisma' owes more to Weber than<br />

to Paul, for whom charisma was an essentially community function (Rom. 12.4-6; 1 Cor. 12.4-<br />

27).<br />

139. See fur<strong>the</strong>r Horsley, Sociology 43-50; 'this uncritical use of <strong>in</strong>dividual texts <strong>in</strong> support<br />

of contentions that most <strong>in</strong> fact do not attest' (45).<br />

140. First Followers 9.<br />

141. See below, chapter 7, n. 96. Theissen was to some extent anticipated by<br />

P. Hoffmann, Studien zur Theologie der Logienquelle (Münster: Aschendorff, 1972, 2 1975)<br />

332-34.<br />

142. J. G. Gager, K<strong>in</strong>gdom and Community: The Social World of Early <strong>Christianity</strong><br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!