09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

d. Conclusion<br />

THE QUESTION OF JESUS' SELF-UNDERSTANDING §16.3<br />

In short, <strong>the</strong>re are grounds, not substantial but probably sufficient, to support<br />

<strong>the</strong>se conclusions regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> remembered <strong>Jesus</strong>: (1) that <strong>Jesus</strong>' Abba prayer<br />

was both a characteristic and as such a dist<strong>in</strong>ctive feature of his pray<strong>in</strong>g, (2) that<br />

this prayer was properly heard to express a profound sense of and confidence <strong>in</strong><br />

his relationship with God as his Fa<strong>the</strong>r, and (3) that <strong>Jesus</strong> was also recalled as allud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to this relationship on a few occasions dur<strong>in</strong>g his mission. We can deduce<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r, without stra<strong>in</strong>, that this sense of sonship must have been (4) crucial, even<br />

central, to <strong>Jesus</strong>' own self-understand<strong>in</strong>g and (5) <strong>the</strong> source of <strong>the</strong> immediacy of<br />

authority with which he proclaimed <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God, <strong>in</strong> both its eschatological<br />

immanence and imm<strong>in</strong>ence. 77 Only if this were <strong>the</strong> case would <strong>the</strong> Fourth<br />

Gospel's massive expansion and elaboration of <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r-Son <strong>the</strong>me have been<br />

as justifiable <strong>in</strong> tradition-historical terms; and only so would <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r elaborations<br />

and developments of <strong>the</strong> Son-christology have been as acceptable as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

event <strong>the</strong>y proved to be.<br />

As for what <strong>Jesus</strong>' sonship meant for his disciples, <strong>the</strong> tradition does not<br />

encourage us to <strong>in</strong>fer that <strong>Jesus</strong> made his relationship with God, as son to fa<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

a subject of explicit <strong>in</strong>struction, still less that he required his disciples to assent to<br />

such a belief regard<strong>in</strong>g himself. Nor that this sense of relationship was a secret<br />

mystery which he taught only to an <strong>in</strong>ner group, a higher stage of <strong>in</strong>itiation, a<br />

goal to be achieved along <strong>the</strong> path of discipleship. What <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition does<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate is that <strong>Jesus</strong> sought to <strong>in</strong>duct his disciples <strong>in</strong>to that same sense of sonship,<br />

not least by teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m to pray as he did, and that he encouraged <strong>the</strong>m<br />

all to live out of <strong>the</strong>ir own relationship to God as Fa<strong>the</strong>r, as he did. And what<br />

seems also to have been <strong>the</strong> case, he saw his disciples' relationship to God as Fa<strong>the</strong>r<br />

as <strong>in</strong> some sense a shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> his own sonship to <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> little evidence we have on <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>the</strong>se are surpris<strong>in</strong>gly large,<br />

but also surpris<strong>in</strong>gly strong conclusions.<br />

16.3. Son of Man: The Issues<br />

After '<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God/heaven' <strong>the</strong>re is no phrase so common <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

tradition as '<strong>the</strong> son of man'. Its importance with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition, and possibly<br />

as a key to that tradition, <strong>the</strong>refore, can hardly be exaggerated. More to <strong>the</strong><br />

immediate po<strong>in</strong>t, it seems to be <strong>the</strong> nearest th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition to a selfchosen<br />

self-designation. For example, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> heal<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> paralysed man <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

77. Keck presses <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t more strongly: '<strong>Jesus</strong> probably saw himself as God's obedient<br />

son, replicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r's way' (Who Is <strong>Jesus</strong>? 97-100; see also 140-44).<br />

724

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!