09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE QUESTION OF JESUS SELF-UNDERSTANDING §16.2<br />

So here we have to ask whe<strong>the</strong>r it could have been <strong>Jesus</strong> himself who expressed<br />

himself so exultantly, perhaps only once, <strong>in</strong> terms which went beyond<br />

those used by <strong>the</strong> righteous man <strong>in</strong> Wisdom or <strong>the</strong> Teacher of Righteousness at<br />

Qumran. 65 In o<strong>the</strong>r words, do we at this po<strong>in</strong>t hear with and through <strong>Jesus</strong>' first<br />

disciples ano<strong>the</strong>r example of <strong>the</strong> eschatological plus (§16.1) — a boast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

plenitude of authority bestowed on him, an exultation at <strong>the</strong> closeness of his relation<br />

with God as Fa<strong>the</strong>r, and a sense that <strong>the</strong> climax of eschatological revelation<br />

depended on his impart<strong>in</strong>g it to o<strong>the</strong>rs? All <strong>the</strong>se elements l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong>to implicit<br />

claims already documented. The question, <strong>the</strong>n, would be whe<strong>the</strong>r it was <strong>Jesus</strong><br />

himself, who on one occasion at least, crystallized <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form preserved<br />

here. Or should <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g proper be attributed ra<strong>the</strong>r to those responsible for <strong>the</strong><br />

early formation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition, aware as we may suppose <strong>the</strong>m to have been<br />

of such implicit eschatological claims and concerned to formulate <strong>the</strong>m more explicitly<br />

and memorably for teach<strong>in</strong>g and liturgical purposes? 66 1 can see noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> text which po<strong>in</strong>ts decisively <strong>in</strong> favour of one alternative ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

(2) The parable of <strong>the</strong> wicked tenants (Mark 12.1-9 pars.):<br />

Matt. 21.33-41<br />

33 'Listen to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

parable. There was a<br />

landowner who planted<br />

a v<strong>in</strong>eyard, put a fence<br />

around it, dug a w<strong>in</strong>e<br />

press <strong>in</strong> it, and built a<br />

watchtower. Then he<br />

leased it to tenants and<br />

went to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

country. 34 When <strong>the</strong><br />

harvest time had come,<br />

he sent his slaves to <strong>the</strong><br />

tenants to collect his<br />

produce.<br />

35 But <strong>the</strong> tenants<br />

seized his slaves and<br />

Mark 12.1-9<br />

1 Then he began to<br />

speak to <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong><br />

parables.<br />

'A man planted<br />

a v<strong>in</strong>eyard, put up a<br />

fence, dug a w<strong>in</strong>e<br />

trough, and built a<br />

watchtower; <strong>the</strong>n he<br />

leased it to tenants and<br />

went to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

country. 2 At <strong>the</strong><br />

appropriate time,<br />

he sent a slave to <strong>the</strong><br />

tenants to collect from<br />

<strong>the</strong>m his share of <strong>the</strong><br />

produce of <strong>the</strong><br />

v<strong>in</strong>eyard. 3 But <strong>the</strong>y<br />

seized him, and<br />

Luke 20.9-16<br />

9 He began to tell <strong>the</strong><br />

people this<br />

parable:<br />

'A man planted<br />

a v<strong>in</strong>eyard.<br />

and leased<br />

it to tenants, and went<br />

to ano<strong>the</strong>r country for a<br />

long time. 10 When<br />

<strong>the</strong> season came, he<br />

sent a slave to <strong>the</strong><br />

tenants <strong>in</strong> order that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y might give him his<br />

share of <strong>the</strong> produce of<br />

<strong>the</strong> v<strong>in</strong>eyard; but <strong>the</strong><br />

tenants<br />

GTh 65<br />

He<br />

said: A good man had<br />

a v<strong>in</strong>eyard.<br />

He gave<br />

it to tenants that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

might cultivate it and<br />

he might receive its<br />

produce from <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

He sent his servant so<br />

that <strong>the</strong> tenants might<br />

give him <strong>the</strong> produce of<br />

<strong>the</strong> v<strong>in</strong>evard. They<br />

seized his servant (and)<br />

65. See above, n. 29. Particularly worthy of note is 1QH 12[4].27: 'through me you have<br />

enlightened <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> many'.<br />

66. Cf. Fuller: 'Matt. 11:27 is not a "christological contraction", but an explicit expression<br />

of <strong>the</strong> implicit Christology of <strong>Jesus</strong>' own use of Abba' (Foundations 133 n. 20), <strong>in</strong> critique<br />

of Hahn, Hoheitstitel 327 (Titles 312); Fitzmyer: 'Although I am <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to regard <strong>the</strong> substance<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se say<strong>in</strong>gs (Luke 10.21-22) as au<strong>the</strong>ntic, that substance should more likely be traced to an<br />

implicit Christology expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>' words and deeds <strong>in</strong> his earthly m<strong>in</strong>istry' (Luke 2.870).<br />

Davies and Allison, however, 'fail to detect any truly tell<strong>in</strong>g signs of an orig<strong>in</strong> with <strong>Jesus</strong>', but go<br />

onto argue for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence of Exod. 33.12-13, with <strong>the</strong> implication that <strong>the</strong> Moses-like prophet<br />

(Deut. 18.15) would have <strong>the</strong> same exceptional face-to-face knowledge of God (Deut. 34.10)<br />

(Mat<strong>the</strong>w 2.283-86). For earlier discussion see my <strong>Jesus</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Spirit 27-34.<br />

720

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!