09.02.2013 Views

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§15.8 Who Did They Th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>Jesus</strong> Was?<br />

of a piece with <strong>Jesus</strong>' proclamation of God's rule. He spoke with <strong>the</strong> authority<br />

of one who proclaimed its imm<strong>in</strong>ence and whose mission already enacted<br />

God's reign <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present. (2) We should also recall Dodd's observation that<br />

<strong>the</strong> 'I say to you' seems to transcend <strong>the</strong> typically prophetic 'Thus says <strong>the</strong><br />

Lord', just as, possibly, <strong>the</strong> 'I came' transcends <strong>the</strong> prophetic 'I was sent'. 423<br />

The 'Amen, I say to you' po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same direction. 424 (3) The same <strong>in</strong>ference<br />

may be drawn from <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>Jesus</strong>' exorcistic practice seems to have<br />

embodied a similar claim to an immediacy of authority: 'I command', ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than, 'I adjure you by . . .' . 425 (4) We also noted <strong>the</strong> possibility which <strong>the</strong> tradition<br />

enshr<strong>in</strong>es that <strong>Jesus</strong> made explicit claim to be <strong>the</strong> saliah of God, God's eschatological<br />

emissary and representative. 426 (5) Is <strong>the</strong>re a similar implication<br />

that <strong>Jesus</strong> saw himself as <strong>the</strong> emissary of div<strong>in</strong>e Wisdom 427 — that is, not just<br />

as teacher of wisdom, but as <strong>the</strong> eschatological spokesman for Wisdom, act<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> God's stead? 428<br />

It may be that such a l<strong>in</strong>e of exposition pushes <strong>the</strong> data too hard. As with<br />

<strong>the</strong> accounts of <strong>the</strong> transfiguration and <strong>the</strong> 'nature miracles', <strong>the</strong> voices of post-<br />

Easter reflection may well have begun to drown out <strong>the</strong> pre-Easter rem<strong>in</strong>iscences<br />

423. See above, §15.6d. Davies argues that when <strong>Jesus</strong> spoke possessed by <strong>the</strong> Spirit of<br />

God it was his alternate persona that spoke (as <strong>in</strong> demon possession) expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g who it was —<br />

<strong>the</strong> spirit/Son of God — and deduces from this that some of <strong>the</strong> 'Johann<strong>in</strong>e style' say<strong>in</strong>gs attributed<br />

to <strong>Jesus</strong> can <strong>the</strong>refore be regarded as 'historically au<strong>the</strong>ntic' {<strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>the</strong> Healer ch. 11).<br />

424. Cf. Jeremias: 'Here is a consciousness of rank which lays claim to div<strong>in</strong>e authority'<br />

(Prayers 115); <strong>the</strong> 'ego is associated with amen and thus claims to speak with div<strong>in</strong>e authority';<br />

'<strong>the</strong> emphatic egö <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> person who uses it is God's representative' (Proclamation<br />

253-54). 'Here speaks a prophet — <strong>in</strong>deed perhaps more than a prophet!' (Theissen and Merz,<br />

Historical <strong>Jesus</strong> 524).<br />

425. See above, §15.7g-h.<br />

426. Mark 9.37/Luke 9.48; Matt. 10.40; Luke 10.16 (see above, §15.6c); Wi<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>gton,<br />

Christology 142-43.<br />

427. Luke 7.35/(Matt. 11.19): <strong>Jesus</strong> and John as children of Wisdom (Mat<strong>the</strong>w's 'deeds'<br />

is probably redactional, to form an <strong>in</strong>clusio with 11.2); Matt. 11.25-27/Luke 10.21-22: a<br />

uniqueness of knowledge and authority (see below §16.2c[l]); Luke 11.49-51/(Matt. 23.34-<br />

36): <strong>Jesus</strong> as one of those sent by Wisdom? In each case, Mat<strong>the</strong>w has developed <strong>the</strong> motif to<br />

identify <strong>Jesus</strong> with div<strong>in</strong>e Wisdom (see my Christology 197-204), but that step does not seem<br />

to have been yet taken <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> q/Q form of <strong>the</strong> tradition (pace Wi<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>gton, Christology 49-53,<br />

who jumps too quickly to <strong>the</strong> possibility that <strong>Jesus</strong> saw himself as div<strong>in</strong>e Wisdom <strong>in</strong>carnate;<br />

similarly <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sage: The Pilgrimage of Wisdom [M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1994]<br />

201-208). See fur<strong>the</strong>r J. Schlosser, 'Q et la christologie implicite', <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>demann, ed., Say<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Source Q 289-316. See also Schüssler Fiorenza, In Memory of Her 132-35; also <strong>Jesus</strong>: Miriam's<br />

Child, Sophia's Prophet (New York: Cont<strong>in</strong>uum, 1995) 141-43.<br />

428. See fur<strong>the</strong>r Hengel, '<strong>Jesus</strong> as Messianic Teacher' 75-87, not<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ter alia, <strong>the</strong> close<br />

tie-<strong>in</strong> between Wisdom and Spirit — <strong>the</strong> gift of supernatural wisdom and prophetic <strong>in</strong>spiration<br />

are <strong>in</strong>terchangeable (93-104).<br />

703

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!