Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1 Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, vol. 1

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

§15.8 Who Did They Think Jesus Was? Qumran — 'the interpreter of the law' 388 — perhaps stimulated by hope of a Moses-like prophet. The further fact that the founder (?) of the Qumran community was known as 'the teacher of righteousness (morh hsdq)' 3S9 is also significant. We do not know whether the name was accorded to him because he fulfilled some expectation or simply because he proved to be such an influential teacher and interpreter of Scripture. But the fact that a figure making such eschatological claims was known simply by that title is a clear indication that the title itself (teacher) was not lacking in weight in Jewish circles. 390 Here too it is relevant to recall that Solomon was remembered as especially wise (1 Kgs. 3.12). The thought was channeled into the idea of Solomon as exorcist (§ 15.7a), but the alternative deduction of the son of David as a teacher of wisdom (Proverbs, Koheleth) lay close to hand. 391 We should also note that some of the eschatological expectation seems to have envisaged an immediacy of teaching by God: 'all your sons shall be taught by the Lord' (Isa. 54.13); 'no longer shall each man teach his neighbour and each his brother, "Know the Lord", for they shall all know me, from the least to the greatest, says the Lord' (Jer. 31.34). Where God was expected to teach directly to the individual heart, there would seem to be little scope for a teacher as intermediary. Given the diversity of eschatological expectation, the point can hardly be pressed, but the evidence available hardly suggests that 'teacher' was a prime messianic or eschatological title at the time of Jesus. b. Jesus' Reputation All the more striking, then, is the fact that 'teacher' is the most common title used for Jesus in the Jesus tradition. 392 The parallel between Jesus and his disciples on the one hand and rabbis and their pupils on the other is deficient, but it cannot be emptied of all significance. 393 Nor should we forget that Josephus also characterized Jesus as 'a teacher of people' (Ant. 18.63). 394 The most striking evidence, however, is the content of the Jesus tradition 388. 4Q174 (4QFlor) 1.11 (different from the 'branch of David'); CD 6.7; 7.18 (identified with the star). 389. See particularly lQpHab 1.13; 2.2; 5.10; 7.4; 11.5; CD 1.11; 20.1, 28, 32. But there was no thought of the Torah being replaced (see, e.g., Schürer, History 2.535-36). 390. How these two figures were related in Qumran thought remains unclear (see Collins, Scepter and Star 102-104, 111-12). 391. Matt. 12.42/Luke 11.31 is relevant here. 392. Data in chapter 8 nn. 22-23 and chapter 14 n. 62 above. 393. See above, § 14.3a. 394. See above, §7.1. Lucian referred to him as 'that crucified sophist' (Peregrinus 13). 697

§15.8 Who Did They Th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>Jesus</strong> Was?<br />

Qumran — '<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpreter of <strong>the</strong> law' 388 — perhaps stimulated by hope of a<br />

Moses-like prophet. The fur<strong>the</strong>r fact that <strong>the</strong> founder (?) of <strong>the</strong> Qumran community<br />

was known as '<strong>the</strong> teacher of righteousness (morh hsdq)' 3S9 is also significant.<br />

We do not know whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> name was accorded to him because he fulfilled<br />

some expectation or simply because he proved to be such an <strong>in</strong>fluential teacher<br />

and <strong>in</strong>terpreter of Scripture. But <strong>the</strong> fact that a figure mak<strong>in</strong>g such eschatological<br />

claims was known simply by that title is a clear <strong>in</strong>dication that <strong>the</strong> title itself<br />

(teacher) was not lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> weight <strong>in</strong> Jewish circles. 390<br />

Here too it is relevant to recall that Solomon was remembered as especially<br />

wise (1 Kgs. 3.12). The thought was channeled <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> idea of Solomon as exorcist<br />

(§ 15.7a), but <strong>the</strong> alternative deduction of <strong>the</strong> son of David as a teacher of<br />

wisdom (Proverbs, Koheleth) lay close to hand. 391<br />

We should also note that some of <strong>the</strong> eschatological expectation seems to<br />

have envisaged an immediacy of teach<strong>in</strong>g by God: 'all your sons shall be taught<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Lord' (Isa. 54.13); 'no longer shall each man teach his neighbour and each<br />

his bro<strong>the</strong>r, "Know <strong>the</strong> Lord", for <strong>the</strong>y shall all know me, from <strong>the</strong> least to <strong>the</strong><br />

greatest, says <strong>the</strong> Lord' (Jer. 31.34). Where God was expected to teach directly to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual heart, <strong>the</strong>re would seem to be little scope for a teacher as <strong>in</strong>termediary.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> diversity of eschatological expectation, <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t can hardly be<br />

pressed, but <strong>the</strong> evidence available hardly suggests that 'teacher' was a prime<br />

messianic or eschatological title at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>Jesus</strong>.<br />

b. <strong>Jesus</strong>' Reputation<br />

All <strong>the</strong> more strik<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>n, is <strong>the</strong> fact that 'teacher' is <strong>the</strong> most common title used<br />

for <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition. 392 The parallel between <strong>Jesus</strong> and his disciples on<br />

<strong>the</strong> one hand and rabbis and <strong>the</strong>ir pupils on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is deficient, but it cannot be<br />

emptied of all significance. 393 Nor should we forget that Josephus also characterized<br />

<strong>Jesus</strong> as 'a teacher of people' (Ant. 18.63). 394<br />

The most strik<strong>in</strong>g evidence, however, is <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> tradition<br />

388. 4Q174 (4QFlor) 1.11 (different from <strong>the</strong> 'branch of David'); CD 6.7; 7.18 (identified<br />

with <strong>the</strong> star).<br />

389. See particularly lQpHab 1.13; 2.2; 5.10; 7.4; 11.5; CD 1.11; 20.1, 28, 32. But <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was no thought of <strong>the</strong> Torah be<strong>in</strong>g replaced (see, e.g., Schürer, History 2.535-36).<br />

390. How <strong>the</strong>se two figures were related <strong>in</strong> Qumran thought rema<strong>in</strong>s unclear (see Coll<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

Scepter and Star 102-104, 111-12).<br />

391. Matt. 12.42/Luke 11.31 is relevant here.<br />

392. Data <strong>in</strong> chapter 8 nn. 22-23 and chapter 14 n. 62 above.<br />

393. See above, § 14.3a.<br />

394. See above, §7.1. Lucian referred to him as 'that crucified sophist' (Peregr<strong>in</strong>us 13).<br />

697

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!